Settings

Theme

JAXA is about to perform a Phobos sample return mission

science.org

109 points by Muhammad523 · 26 comments

Reader

7 threads
Animats

Nice. These missions that tell us the basics about objects in the Solar System are more useful than, say, re-visiting the moon or Mars.

Venus and Europa could use some attention. Anything underway?

Panzerschrek

Russia tried such mission back in year 2011: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fobos-Grunt. Sadly it failed shortly after the launch.

TGower

JAXA does great work, they also publish the highest resolution open access global surface elevation model. Really impressive for a country with about 1/10th the GDP of the US.

a3w

Bringing Protomolecule to earth, when?

(Minor spoilers for The Expanse, word Protomolecule means something there.)

dvh

I hope they make some photos of Phobos monolith: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_monolith

hbarka

I wonder how this mission compares in scale to the JAXA Hayabusa comet interceptor done twenty years ago.

johnea

This is good space science.

Unlike iPhone selfies around the moon, or golf on mars.

Manned space missions are very rarely justified in the modern era.

An unmanned probe doing science for 20 years, or a one shot influenza photo op.

The cost is about the same...

  • fooker

    It is important to get people excited about science, and inspire the next generation of scientists rather than choose the cheapest path to ‘good science’.

    Without public support, you’ll soon find yourself without any funding. This pretty much explains NASA’s dire funding situation over the last thirty or so years.

    You can only get so many people excited about weather balloons and space rock chemistry.

  • dyauspitr

    > Manned space missions are very rarely justified in the modern era.

    Unless you want to be interplanetary

    • manquer

      Depends on your definition of you .

      If it means life , then We don’t need humans to make life interplanetary at all; that is least efficient way to go about it ; we should instead design/choose lifeforms that are most likely to survive the target environment not depend on brittle/expensive life support technology to spread life through the system.

      If the you is intelligence , then spreading AI could be a better approach rather than humans who are unlikely to be able evolve to survive in a hostile environment naturally anytime soon.

      Humans in our current form in space is always going to expensive tourism no matter how much science fiction likes to pretend otherwise .

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection