Playing "Taboo" with AI Watermarking
Today ChatGPT emitted a design doc that described our service to service messaging architecture as a "capability fabric". Notice the double noun, as if the a single 2-part word was thesaurused one word at a time. Unnoticeable they said.
Did you write this post with AI because I could say the same about your choice to says ChatGPT "Emitted" something. Why not 'made', 'produced', 'created' etc?
It looks like you thesaurused a less common word for a job done by more common ones.
Never heard of "capability fabric" but I do wonder if it pulled it straight from https://naftiko.io/glossary/capability-fabric/
I'm not saying you are wrong, just pointing out that we all have idiolects that make us make word choices others wouldn't. Also, I didn't think ChatGPT were doing text watermarking. Isn't it just Claude and Gemini so far?
Made produced and created, wrote? imply agency... Anyways my point is about replacing widely used jargon with made up jargon (ok new jargon) that makes you squint and obfuscates the connection to industry standard.
That glossary also reads like this:
Why it matters Without a fabric, integration complexity grows quadratically with each new system. A capability fabric linearizes this growth by providing shared infrastructure for discovery, governance, and composition – turning integration from a liability into an organizational asset.
Anyways, I'm pretty sure the only reason you'd do this (watermarking) is to be able separate your own outputs from the internet. And if you can make it a law so all the other AI companies collude even better.