Settings

Theme

Treasury Orders Erasure of Domestic Ownership Records

home.treasury.gov

46 points by Jimmc414 · 11 comments

Reader

2 threads
RevEng

I could perhaps understand ending the reporting rule, but deleting all existing records? That's very suspicious.

  • anamax

    Govt should not have information unless there is a very specific and "in the law" reason for govt to have that information.

    If there's no reporting rule, there's no reason for govt to have that information.

evanjrowley

I recall many small business owners panicking when this requirement seemed to sneak up on them.

Wasn't the purpose of it to aid in mitigating certain types of fraud, like with Covid-19 PPP loans and Medicare?

  • erentz

    I think the genesis was the Panama papers release way back. Turns out the US is one of the better places to launder money through.

    I don’t understand though: Why would any company find it difficult to register their owners? That seems like a pretty basic thing any company should know and it’s a perfectly normal thing in most countries.

    • lazide

      Most countries have work arounds, because of a combo of;

      1) stalkers 2) hiding money from divorce proceedings and angry ex’s 3) hiding money from lawyers looking for a payday 4) hiding money from various tax authorities

      well, often there is a lot of overlap among all of these.

      • lazide

        Note: for all these groups, it can be fun to kinda act like you have hidden assets in classic places so they spin their wheels thinking you are a genius hiding things there, until they get in trouble with their bosses for wasting their time being creepy stalkers.

        Hello ladies!

  • rglover

    Supposedly, but there was scant information about the what/why and small businesses were told compliance was mandatory and failure to comply would have been a felony (if memory serves). This is phenomenal news if you're an SMB. That would have caused a lot of grief for those unaware (most people were because rollout was slipshod at best).

    • HWR_14

      The cost was filling out a form. Maybe you had to photocopy your ID.

      And if I recall correctly it was only a felony to refuse to comply. The government sent letters that had to be ignored, etc.

      • jerdthenerd

        I personally filled out this form, under duress, because there was ZERO communication from any regulating body of the requirement.

        And yes it was a felony to not register by, IIRC, December 31st of the same year the measure was passed or some other very accelerated timeline.

        There was no email, letter, or notification received. The data collected included enough information for someone to effectively takeover my business record for my state if the government dataset ever got leaked.

        I'm glad they are forcing the erasure of the data.

      • htrp

        It was just filling out a form

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection