Settings

Theme

Operation: Epic Furious

epicfurious.com

382 points by dmschulman 2 months ago · 136 comments

Reader

an0malous 2 months ago

It's great except the war is obviously for Israel not oil, we had more access to oil before the war

  • lopsotronic 2 months ago

    I think it might be even worse than that. It's a war for nothing at all.

    A defense analyst said, "we can't be sure that the administration has met their war aims" and it made me scream at the radio. What aims? They didn't even bother making something up. At least Bush 2 respected us well enough to lie. I have no idea what any of this is supposed to accomplish.

    You're watching a nuclear power putter around a marina with fifty brawling toddlers climbing all over the tiller.

    • tim333 2 months ago

      Various potential aims have been mentioned - stop nukes, regime change, support the protestors, stop support for Hamas and the like. The trouble is none of it seems planned out or able to achieve them.

      • lopsotronic 2 months ago

        Mentioned by . . the President? SecDef? Did they mention these things before munitions were released? Perhaps I have not been paying attention, but generally before exploding another sovereign nation PotUS does a little speaking thing.

        June 2025, when the U.S. struck Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, PotUS did a little thing that Sunday evening, talked about degrading nuclear capability, yadda yadda. It's almost entirely bullshit, but it's still communication.

        These OEF attacks are orders of magnitude more extensive, and so far as I can tell PotUS kind of vaguely talked about Iran before addressing an unrelated MoH ceremony March 2. But nearly simultaneously Rubio was talking about unrelated sets of goals, then the April 1 "Clear and Unchanging Objectives" release, so on and so forth, but to date no two goals stay the same four days running.

        It's like eating paint chips.

        • tim333 2 months ago

          Back in January (13th) when the Iran protests were going on we had Trump truthing:

          >Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY

          then he sent aircraft carriers, then, Feb 28th:

          >To the great, proud people of Iran, I say tonight that the hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay sheltered. Don’t leave your home. It’s very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be probably your only chance for generations.

          So that seems to have kicked it off, but helping the protestors seems to have been largely forgotten now.

          I remember thinking that there's a problem with the "when we are finished, take over your government" bit in that there are millions of Iranians who'd like the government changed but they are generally unarmed whereas the regime has about a million loyalists armed with machine guns so protestors tend just to get shot.

    • Henchman21 2 months ago

      Once again I’ll say: the purpose is clear, you just don’t want to admit it. The point is to destroy the US.

  • namuol 2 months ago

    Oil prices going up is “good” for petrol states who aren’t blocked.

    But yeah fair callout about Israel.

  • epistasis 2 months ago

    Well oil is frequently trotted out as a reason to do this, so we certainly can't take oil out of the discussion, whether it feels like it's an obvious bad reason or not.

    It's been all throughout the news throughout March and April, here's some examples (please excuse the LLM summary, but summarizing lots of repetitive news links is actually one thing that LLMs do not hallucinate on often):

    > March 29-30, 2026: Trump told the Financial Times that his "preference would be to take the oil" and discussed seizing Kharg Island, which handles over 90% of Iran's oil exports.

    > April 3, 2026: In a social media post, he claimed that with more time, the U.S. could "OPEN THE HORMUZ STRAIT, TAKE THE OIL, & MAKE A FORTUNE".

    > April 6, 2026: At the White House Easter Egg Roll, Trump told reporters, "If I had my choice, I'd keep the oil," but noted that he hadn't fully done so because he wanted to "make the people of our country happy" who wanted the war to end

    March 29 - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-pre...

    April 3 - Trump posting on social media https://uk.news.yahoo.com/trump-makes-cryptic-social-media-2...

    April 6 - https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/06/trump-says-he-would...

    • an0malous 2 months ago

      They’ve also said it was to stop their nuclear weapons program, the same program they said they destroyed at the beginning of the year.

      They additionally said it was to free the Iranian people from the oppressive regime, and later said we would end their civilization if they don’t agree to a cease fire.

      I’m sure obtaining their oil is a goal, but it’s not their primary goal.

      • epistasis 2 months ago

        Well even "a" goal is a big change from "obviously not".

        Historians will debate the true reasons for this invasion, but in the end I think they'll conclude it's just the random actions of a very incompetint and not very intelligent person that acts with pure id.

        • an0malous 2 months ago

          If I go to the supermarket for groceries and fill up the gas in my car to get there, my goal wasn’t to get gas, it was to get groceries.

          The historians are already saying this war is for Israel, that’s what John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs are saying. I’m sure the companies that produce the textbooks will find a way to say how it’s all rather more complicated than that though.

          • epistasis 2 months ago

            > John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs

            lol those people are absolute shills and frauds, completely discredited liars.

            I do agree that Israel is largely the impetus, but citing fools like those people is a bit discrediting. They might be right by accident but they are not serious people.

            Plus, you're completely ignoring that Trump was aglow with the thrill of stealing Venezuela's oil. The idea that stealing Iran's oil wasn't a driver is a bit ridiculous, as evidence abounds both before and after the war, in his own words. Just never listen to Sachs or Mearshmeirer unless it is to understand what their puppet masters are trying to trick you into believing.

            • ifyoubuildit 2 months ago

              Do you have any specifics about Mearsheimer or Sachs? Or just vague insinuations.

              • r721 2 months ago

                I don't know about their recent comments on Iran/Israel/US, but these two certainly participated in distributing pro-Kremlin propaganda about Russia/Ukraine conflict:

                >Sachs has suggested that the U.S. was responsible for the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline. In February 2023, he was invited by the Russian government to address the United Nations Security Council about the topic.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Sachs#Russian_invasion...

                >They willingly appear on the programs of Russia’s most odious state propagandist, Vladimir Solovyov ... Mr. Sachs has made three appearances on Mr. Solovyov’s programs since November.

                https://archive.is/WRODG (WSJ)

                >In John Mearsheimer's 2023 book How States Think, the preface acknowledges him receiving a small financial support from Valdai in conjunction with Best Book award for his 2019 book The Great Delusion.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valdai_Discussion_Club

                https://valdaiclub.com/about/experts/4624/

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mearsheimer#Russian_invas...

                • ifyoubuildit 2 months ago

                  So you know who blew up nordstream?

                  The financial support point seems like it could have some legs. The other ones aren't terribly convincing. "They went on the bad guys show" or "they said the same things the bad guys say" isn't all that compelling to me.

                  I don't see how any of it rises up to "lol they've been completely debunked"

                  As someone who has no dog in the Russia/Ukraine fight (other than my tax dollars), I never liked how if one side said the sky was blue and you entertained the idea, suddenly you love the enemy, and you're parroting their talking points. Nevermind that neither of them are my friend.

                  • r721 2 months ago

                    >So you know who blew up nordstream?

                    It's pretty well known for now that it was a team of Ukrainians (the only question is whether Zelensky or CIA knew about it at the time, here's one of recent articles: https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/pipeline-explosio...).

                    Anyway I linked that for "he was invited by the Russian government to address the United Nations Security Council" bit to show he's aligned with Russian state views on the topic.

                    >"They went on the bad guys show"

                    The thing is that people who disagree with Russian state are not invited on that show.

              • epistasis 2 months ago

                Pretty much anything they have said about Ukraine. Look at their predictions in Ukraine, or Sachs lying blatantly about Maidan:

                https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/1ohpa7j/italian_se...

                These people serve highly political ends, and do not have factual goals in their communication.

  • han1 2 months ago

    They say Palantir israeli good software ;)

  • captainbland 2 months ago

    I mean it's not clear the current state of things was the ambition before the war, a while back they were talking about seizing Kharg island which indicates capturing oil resources was an objective

    • athrowaway3z 2 months ago

      No - it indicates gross incompetence of the people in charge of the war and its communication.

      Any media worth its salt spend a brief time explaining why invading Kharg would mean mass US casualties, while having no critical objectives only achievable by seizing Kharg.

      If one of your media sources only echoed "reports of the US looking to seize Kharg island" without that context it was wasting your time for attention.

    • an0malous 2 months ago

      The oil is a secondary objective to keep markets stable so there’s less dissent domestically, the primary objective is to weaken Iran so that Israel can continue their expansion in the Middle East with less resistance. Their goal for decades now has been to become a world power like the US, Russia, and China and they manipulate US foreign policy to achieve these aims. This isn’t even a secret, you could read the Clean Break memo or read Israeli news where they talk about this somewhat openly.

      The war will continue at least up to elections, maybe longer since Zionism has bipartisan support in the US, but they’ll at least have to change the messaging or approach somehow. These ceasefire negotiations are a farce and will invariably fall through. The US will get no benefits and the spin will be how incompetent the Trump administration is for creating another quagmire but there was never anything for the US to gain from this and the real objective of exhausting the US military resources to undermine Iran will have been achieved. They ideally would still like to install the descendant of the last Shah as the new prime minister, but if that can’t be accomplished they’ll just reset the Iranian civilization back 20 years by destroying infrastructure, oil fields, and killing influential and popular leaders.

      The only redeeming factor of the Trump admin is that they are genuinely incompetent so this hidden hand influencing our foreign policy is more apparent but they’re not so incompetent to have started a war they have nothing to gain from.

    • engineer_22 2 months ago

      Trump meeting with China this week, China maybe part of the calculus

adriand 2 months ago

Wow - the writing in this is fantastic. This is genuinely hilarious!

chabes 2 months ago

Why was this removed from the front page? It was number one just a couple minutes ago

  • timeisapear 2 months ago

    I think we need an official HN response. This is a legitimate video game, which happens to be satire. If we as a community cannot handle this, I don't know if I want to be a part of it anymore, even though I've been here since 2014.

  • fyrn_ 2 months ago

    Can't rock the boat too much, when the captain has a lot of money

  • ffsm8 2 months ago

    Political satire. People who take themselves and their political alignment too seriously will inevitably flag it.

  • tolerance 2 months ago

    This is one of those submissions that will invariably descend into a flame war if someone dare criticize it and infringe upon the consensus joy of others.

  • fallingmeat 2 months ago

    here for this comment

namuol 2 months ago

Is this post shadow-flagged or something? It’s off the front page.

jryio 2 months ago

Who remembers the Newgrounds games making fun of Bush during the Iraq war?

jcpham2 2 months ago

this game has been deployed IRL to arcade cabinets and troops have been spotted playing the cabinets

source: https://i.redd.it/v5dmdpof1q0h1.jpeg

JKCalhoun 2 months ago

Here's hoping there are expansion packs (and that Mexico will pay for them).

lbrito 2 months ago

I was unsure if this was a legit propaganda piece for the first few seconds!

NDlurker 2 months ago

Hilarious. I played through it twice. I think I found everything except for the vial of measles. Maybe it was never meant to be found hahaha

  • throwaway2037 2 months ago

        > vial of measles
    
    Main map, middle left, just below Putin. Did you find the ping pong balls for Kash Patel? I could not.
    • NDlurker 2 months ago

      Oh wow. Nope. He never even asked me for that. I guess I need to do another playthrough

sailfast 2 months ago

"Hold Hands" > GAME OVER

baggachipz 2 months ago

Absolutely brilliant and I'm amazed at how current it is. Huge kudos to the developer.

dwa3592 2 months ago

I decided to get the diet coke and call it "enough" for the day.

tofuahdude 2 months ago

Anyone finish burning the files yet?

I tried... but it looked like it would take awhile...

egorfine 2 months ago

Excellent. I remember King Quest, Larry Quest and the rest and it immediately gave me the same nostalgic vibes.

TarqDirtyToMe 2 months ago

This would be perfect on a play date

yndoendo 2 months ago

For what MAGA views as good for the USA is actually a deplorable loss for the civilized world.

  • ndsipa_pomu 2 months ago

    To be fair, MAGA don't really hold views so much as they repeat what they're told to repeat.

LetsGetTechnicl 2 months ago

I can't believe we're so beyond parody at this point. Also, instant game over from trying to hold Melania's hand lol

jansan 2 months ago

I know this is frowned upon on HN, so feel free to vote me down.

But it only works on Firefox for me, not on Chrome.

Error Message on Chrome:

    Error: Failed to initialize graphics.
    at SceneManager.initGraphics (rmmz_managers.js:1957:15)
    at SceneManager.initialize (rmmz_managers.js:1929:10)
    at SceneManager.initialize (CGMZ_Core.js:1662:41)
    at SceneManager.run (rmmz_managers.js:1918:14)
    at Main.onEffekseerLoad (main.js:150:22)
    at _onRuntimeInitialized (effekseer.min.js:35:44)
    at effekseer.min.js:35:327
    at Module.onRuntimeInitialized (effekseer.min.js:15:164351)
    at doRun (effekseer.min.js:15:164904)
    at run (effekseer.min.js:15:165064)
  • barnabee 2 months ago

    > it only works on Firefox for me, not on Chrome

    Sounds like a feature, not a bug

  • kg 2 months ago

    Try going to chrome://gpu and looking for red text or error messages

sarthak_sachdev 2 months ago

I should have gone ahead with the diet coke

dlev_pika 2 months ago

It’s so hard to parody these mfers, like AJ - no matter how outrageous, could very well fit in their actual week

numpad0 2 months ago

  > Error
  > Your browser does not allow to read local files.
WHAT
  • consp 2 months ago

    It's rpgmaker which might use the "local storage api" for some state management depending on the exact version.

avaer 2 months ago

For context, this is made by https://www.thesecrethandshake.com/, the same group behind the Trump + Epstein statue at the National Mall.

tt_dev 2 months ago

love the music

christkv 2 months ago

Reminds me of that Alex Jones shooter

dethos 2 months ago

This is genuinely funny. Spot on.

throwaway2037 2 months ago

I understand this is probably flagged for "off-topic or political", but can we just appreciate the 1980s/1990s pixel art vibe? There is so much here: A blend of NES Final Fantasy and NES StarTropics. Plus, the enemies and their names are genuinely funny: Handsome Mamdani (after new NYC mayor), DEIyatolla (after Iran Ayatolla), low flow shower head (seriously, I had to Google this one!). Also, the anonymous artist collective behind it, Secret Handshake, is worthy of discussion.

I played the game for a bit, but I cannot figure how to win. (FYI: Google tells me with bad AI/LLM that it may not be possible to win.) I can finish all side quests except I cannot find Kash Patel's (beer) ping pong balls. I even figured out how to beat the "Weak on Crime Pope" using a magic spell. When I sit on the golden toilet and use Truth Social to post, I "win"... then when I try to leave the building, Theo Von forces me to repeat the game. Also, there are two broken bridges that I cannot fix. Also, I can collect one extra barrel of oil ("lube"), but no idea if I can use this extra barrel.

Related from Wired: "There’s an Unhinged New Video Game About Trump and the Iran War"

Ref: https://www.wired.com/story/video-game-trump-iran-war/

ge96 2 months ago

Man no ball room?

input_sh 2 months ago

Does the game just loop? I got the lube, then the TP, then the lube again, then the TP again...

I mean it'd make sense for it to loop, but I'm just wondering if I'm missing something or should I just call it there.

han1 2 months ago

I think we know why Trump needs three barrels of lube... for his best friendstein!

avador 2 months ago

epicfurious.com is blocked by my service provider. It’s a small, local, fiber company called mornington.

They do not say why in the returned html.

I do not approve of such blockage.

Nevertheless. Knowledge is knowledge. So I post for everyone’s sake.

  • mschuster91 2 months ago

    A DNS WHOIS [1] shows what's likely the cause:

    > Important Dates: Created 4/28/2026

    Many an ISP these days blocks domains that have been registered less than a month ago because most scam campaigns have to cycle through domains way faster than that time.

    Check if you have enabled some sort of "malware protection" at your ISP, because that usually is based on DNS filtering.

    [1] https://who.is/whois/epicfurious.com

  • epistasis 2 months ago

    I was going to say that political censorship is out of control in the US, but that appears to be a Canadian ISP?

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection