Settings

Theme

Be Alexandra Elbakyan

twitter.com

121 points by DanielleMolloy 4 days ago · 19 comments · 1 min read

Reader

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandra_Elbakyan

https://twitter.com/MushtaqBilalPhD/status/20490573440138815...

onetimeusename 4 days ago

So I imagine, with some irony, that she can avoid US courts because Russia doesn't have an extradition agreement. To some extent, it seems like content sharing apps are often Russia based. So evading shutdown in Western nations requires a hostile regime. So free access to Western, public-funded, scientific research relies on Russian networks and jurisdiction often.

  • ls612 4 days ago

    Also why Rutracker is by far the best public tracker.

    • r721 4 days ago

      Rutracker is blocked in Russia.

      • ls612 3 days ago

        Isn't that because they are anti-Putin not because of copyright?

        • r721 3 days ago

          It definitely started with copyright infringement dispute in 2015 (with Russian authors/publishers though), and I don't remember any anti-Putin statements from them (though it's possible I missed something).

  • ahartmetz 4 days ago

    When the system is so bad that fighting it improves it. It's a standard feature of a decent, non-totalitarian political system that it improves that way. Just don't tell Putin. But he wouldn't get it anyway. Totalitarian and democratic regimes often have basic problems understanding each other.

mjd 4 days ago

She's a hero.

ipsum2 4 days ago

is Sci-Hub still updated for new papers?

ChrisArchitect 4 days ago

Source: https://twitter.com/MushtaqBilalPhD/status/20490573440138815...

Instead of links from randoms

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandra_Elbakyan

renewiltord 4 days ago

These massive green text attempts started becoming common recently and honestly they’re excruciatingly boring. Misses the entire value of the medium. Very “hello, fellow kids”.

metadat 4 days ago

The Elsevier reply is infuriating. The system is broken.

https://nitter.space/MushtaqBilalPhD/status/2049485871699931...

  • Revanche1367 4 days ago

    That’s not a reply, it’s sarcasm by the same poster pretending to speak for the publisher as a joke.

    • d0mine 4 days ago

      What part of the reply is not factually correct? (premium gold+ open access article for $50000?)

      • Revanche1367 4 days ago

        I didn’t say it wasn’t factually correct. I assumed it was mostly correct, perhaps a bit sensationalist for comedic purposes. I found it quite funny actually. My answer above was just that it was not actually written by the Elsevier company like that user seems to have thought.

  • crest 4 days ago

    Some people look best in the warm glow of their own pyre.

  • hmartin 4 days ago

    Um......

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection