Settings

Theme

President's new science council: 9 billionaires and 1 scientist

scientificamerican.com

53 points by grvbck 2 months ago · 15 comments

Reader

em-bee 2 months ago

HN submissions near april 1st should include the day when the linked article was posted. this one was posted on march 27.

recent news are so absurd that you can't tell reality from an april fools joke any more.

2020science 2 months ago

It's an issue! As someone who's worked on science policy for decades, including time in the Beltway, you cannot develop a robust and world-leading science policy strategy with technologists alone!

  • ivell 2 months ago

    I would say still better than reality TV stars and ignorant podcasters.

  • karmakaze 2 months ago

    ...and you can with a single technologist?

    • salawat 2 months ago

      Perhaps you don't understand peon. The technologist is there to take orders and execute. You thought you were being given input/a voice at the table? God, no. That's above your station. Now go on, shoo. Let the monied people talk. We'll call you when we need something done.

frogperson 2 months ago

Everyday a new low. I shouldnt be surprised, but i cant believe someone could be so self serving and selfish.

dougg 2 months ago

> focus on the opportunities and challenges that emerging technologies present to the American worker…

None of the billionaires care about the challenges of these technologies to the American worker. One of them laid off 30,000 workers yesterday, and the rest have laid off hundreds of thousands more directly (in their words) BECAUSE of AI / emerging technologies.

Just feels hypocritical and disrespectful

danbrooks 2 months ago

This feels like regulatory capture by the tech industry. Academic research needs representation as well.

brewcejener 2 months ago

I bet we see some incredible vaccines released in the near future. We'll be sending patients to cure their cancer regularly on Mars.

bmitc 2 months ago

Big f'ing surprise.

ticulatedspline 2 months ago

Not that it matters much, pretty sure Trump is inadvisable.

bediger4000 2 months ago

We should insist on the proper name, "oligarchs", perhaps with the adjective "Trump crony".

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection