Ask HN: Why do most analytics tools show what happened but not why?
ost analytics tools show what happened — bounce rate, session time, clicks.
But they rarely explain why visitors hesitated or lost trust.
For example: • unclear value proposition • weak credibility signals • cognitive overload in the hero section
I'm experimenting with a tool that tries to model this psychological layer.
Curious if others here have run into the same problem. One pattern I keep noticing when analyzing landing pages: High bounce rates often come from subtle trust gaps rather than obvious UX issues. Examples I see a lot: • weak credibility signals above the fold
• unclear product positioning
• pricing hesitation
• cognitive overload in hero sections Traditional analytics show the bounce rate but don't really reveal which psychological factor caused it. Curious how other founders here approach diagnosing this.