The SIMD-CSV crate chose not to use simdjson tricks to parse CSV with SIMD
docs.rsWhat is the advantage of this over the parser used by xsv? From the documentation, the only difference I can see is that xsv handles weird CSV better than this crate-- which in some situations is very important! So presumably this one must be faster? If so, how much faster? Or is there some other advantage to this?
There is a section here with a table describing the kind of boost you might observe vs. rust-csv used by xsv: https://docs.rs/simd-csv/latest/simd_csv/#regarding-performa...
It would be useful to see how it compares to this .NET parser: https://github.com/nietras/Sep