Settings

Theme

Ask HN: Why aren't privacy policies standardised like licenses

12 points by raghavtoshniwal 2 years ago · 4 comments · 1 min read


Open Source solved the licensing problem by standardising around different flavours of licenses like Apache, GPL, Creative Commons etc.

You could still go and create your own License but its standard practice to just pick one that suits best for you (if you’re not trying to do something weird)

Now you don’t have to go through each different license to know what is/isnt allowed.

Why haven’t we come to something similar for privacy policies. Is there some obvious reason I’m missing?

PS: If there isn’t a good reason for it, I’m interested in creating a schelling point of sorts for this, please let me know if this sounds interesting

toast0 2 years ago

P3P was that https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/P3P

stop50 2 years ago

An license that is like GPL(one size fits all) is not possible. But there are legal companies that provide forms that provide good templates for common usecases

  • raghavtoshniwalOP 2 years ago

    It makes sense that one size fits all privacy policy wouldn’t be possible, but for most good faith actors, they collect data in same-ish patterns, and have same-ish privacy stances.

    Why don’t we label and popularize them so consumers know what they’re getting into without having to parse the policy each time.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection