Settings

Theme

Hetzner dedicated servers alternative in US

10 points by jaigupta 3 years ago · 14 comments · 1 min read

Reader

At present we are using Hetzner AX101/AX102 dedicated servers. They are of great value for money. What provider would you recommend in the US? I understand it may not be as good value for money as Hetzner but hopefully as reliable and performant.

bckygldstn 3 years ago

OVH has a US West Coast datacentre that is probably going to be the most similar: https://us.ovhcloud.com/bare-metal/prices/

They were the only provider I could find to match my Hetzner SX64 specs for less than 2x the price.

  • jaiguptaOP 3 years ago

    How is your experience with OVH?

    • vmarchaud 3 years ago

      We have ~two dozens rented boxes @ OVH in their French datacenters, apart from hardware failures from time to time (1/2 per year) you should be fine, just take that into account while designing the architecture. Also don't expect the support to helps you, they will sometimes but i'll say it's better to not expect it to not be surprised :)

    • bckygldstn 3 years ago

      Eh I only have 2 servers with them. I had difficulty with one becoming unresponsive right after setup, but after grabbing a replacement I’ve had no issues with them for the last year.

warrenm 3 years ago

I'm not up on non-Hetzner physical machine rentals ... but I am curious: why are you looking for a different vendor?

  • PaulWaldman 3 years ago

    Not OP, but I believe Hetzner may not have dedicated options in US DCs.

    • warrenm 3 years ago

      I know Hetzner doesn't have physical servers in the US (yet)

      This was more a question of "why physical" and "why in the US" :)

    • KomoD 3 years ago

      Yeah, US is only for cloud products at the moment

    • jaiguptaOP 3 years ago

      Correct. This is the only reason.

      • warrenm 3 years ago

        I was more going for "why physical" and "why in the US" :)

        • jaiguptaOP 3 years ago

          We are an SaaS provider and customers demand to be hosted in US for various reasons

          (a) They think they will get better performance/latency (although in our application it does not matter much) (b) For various compliance

          We had been using co-location so far for US but we don't want to continue this road because of high investment (especially when compared with Hetzner) and higher responsibilities (hardware issues, inventory).

yuppie_scum 3 years ago

AWS.

  • jaiguptaOP 3 years ago

    Really? I don't find them to be of a good value at all. Not just bandwidth but also the baseline network speed limitations based on EC2 size.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection