A published paper used capital T's instead of error bars
retractionwatch.comI like this explanation: "Cause they used a t-test"
The honest data sharing statement about no data sets being generated is a delightfully honest admission of their results being made up.
Was this an AI generated paper?
Possibly attempted Sokal-style hoax.
how did this get through peer review ??? does no one read the article before it's published?