Settings

Theme

Snowflake acquires Streamlit for $800M to help customers build data-based apps

techcrunch.com

129 points by talltofu · 44 comments

Reader

16 threads
kthejoker2

This seems like a lot of money? I like Streamlit fine but I don't see $800m of value in it or even its potential.

What am I missing?

On the other hand, definitely encouraging me to go start a side hustle building some ML-tinged BI app on top of Dremio or Fugue or Materialized or Datadog or some other contender for data platform du jour and just hunt down Fortune 500 users to give it away to in exchange for (9 figure!) clout.

  • g8oz

    Right, Streamlit is decent but the price tag is a headscratcher. It's not as if there aren't plenty of other mature Python dashboarding solutions.

    https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/streamlit-vs-dash-vs-v...

    • hackernewds

      It's par for the course of snowflake really not understanding data visualization or how their end users need a UI to be (no find replace still for example!)

  • crsv

    It’s probably not much cash and mostly using equity that’s locked up for multiple years since snowflake is public.

  • blitzar

    There are two numbers - a) what is it worth, b) if Snowflake own it what is it worth to their shareholders.

    Probably worth ~100mil (idk?) - however, probably adds a billion to snowflakes market cap, hence the pricetag.

  • foxhop

    let me know too.

dang

The company announcements are https://blog.streamlit.io/snowflake-to-acquire-streamlit/ and

https://investors.snowflake.com/news/news-details/2022/Snowf...

We changed the URL above to what seems to be the best third party article (for reasons I was explaining in a different thread earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30531133).

oerpli

I've been using Streamlit for roughly half a year to build various dashboards and GUIs for custom analysis scripts and I am honestly neither surprised that they were acquired nor by the price tag.

Our data is quite complicated and needs a lot of custom code & filtering. Even relatively simple analytical questions need some custom code, if people don't want to do almost everything manually (i.e.: Origin, Export to Excel, crop and move around data...).

Over the years I built up libraries and functions for some of these tasks and with Streamlit I can just slap a sufficiently nice interactive GUI on top in 1-2 hours and iterate the analysis live during a call (give them the URL and ask what additional filters, visualizations they would need, adapt the code in the background and they see the results instantly).

Overall, congratulations - well earned. Also, I considered applying for a position there and regret not doing so.

gk1

Congrats to the Streamlit team. My every interaction with them has been positive. Add to that the great product and community they’ve built, and you get a company that’s deserving of this outcome.

notacanofsoda

Is this strange to anyone else? Streamlit and Snowflake occupy fairly different niches.

  • skadamat

    I'm knee deep in the data tooling space myself and it's quirky at first but not too surprising.

    This resembles the Google Cloud acquisition of Kaggle, or Microsoft's acquisition of Github. For better or for worse, these larger players / platforms are buying a large community around the hip tool. Snowflake wants to be a giant data platform company, not just "another data warehouse".

    • tomrod

      No stranger than Confluence acquiring Chartio. Snowflake has been making some interesting ventures and investments (eg Sigma Computing).

      As a user of data tooling, bundling data pipelining, cloud warehousing, visualization, and MLOPs into a consistent environment is helpful and lowers tooling cost. Streamlit is frankly fantastic and one of my personal favorite tools.

      Source: Myself, and I have family that run Datateer, an up and coming pipelining/analytics ops player in the space.

    • d4rkp4ttern

      I think it’s more analogous to google cloud acquisition of Looker, rebranded as Google Data Studio

    • sarma912

      Would love to chat about data tooling!

  • duncan-donuts

    Not really? Wouldn’t the streamlit app/notebook/editor experience compliment the snowflake data warehousing solutions well?

    • skadamat

      Yeah it definitely would. Historically, to OP's hesitation, databases & data warehouses haven't purchased BI tools, application layers, etc. But this is starting to change (e.g. Databricks bought Redash, an open source BI platform)

      • tomrod

        Databricks immediately comes to mind as well. When it's assembled right, it's a fantastic tooling.

    • IanCal

      I think it's a key area snowflake have been lacking. Built in nice dashboards that are as easy to throw together as a streamlit app would be a killer feature. Their lack in this area was a key issue for me.

  • thenanyu

    It's very strange. There must be some vision to create a unified BI + Data Science platform but it's very pie-in-the-sky feeling to me.

    • mirntyfirty

      True, I’d say that BI is saturated with a number of well built products, but perhaps the purchasers of those products aren’t fully aware of what’s available?

      • thenanyu

        Yeah the market is super fragmented but enormous. Even huge players like Tableau have a small slice of the market. It's really wild-west feeling and no one is confident they know what they're doing when it comes to implementation/ops.

  • talltofuOP

    Does this compete with or complement their Snowpark feature?

    • ricklamers

      Complement. Snowpark pushes compute to the SQL engine. That’s a better model for Streamlit’s dashboard code anyway :)

nyellin

Very cool.

A few months ago I tried building a configuration manager for robusta.dev using streamlit.

Basically I wanted to autogenerate a frontend for arbitrary Pydantic models (in my case configurations of Kubernetes automations). The tooling was still lacking so I abandoned the project, but it was really cool just how far I could get with writing almost no code. A way better experience than all the no code tools IMO

domunabhai

$800M feels rich though. Is it validated or just speculation by TechCrunch?

ahungry

It'd be nice if someone on the Snowflake team actually maintained their JS adapter... (https://github.com/snowflakedb/snowflake-connector-nodejs/pu...)

lumost

I'm really unclear on snowflake's valuation along with similar companies in the cloud data space. Why are these companies worth 100x revenue?

  • ZeroCool2u

    Snowflake is basically GCP BigQuery or AWS Athena, but they charge $40/TB of (highly compressed) storage and have a decent margin on compute too. It's also completely proprietary, so you're not exiting their platform anytime soon. The other big player in this space is DataBricks, which is a reasonable product, but their pricing is based on both instance type and volume of data consumed by a query, which can get pretty insane quickly when dealing with large amounts. Again, they rely on lock-in to a significant extent.

    • fphhotchips

      Snowflake employee here, speaking on my own behalf.

      It's no harder to get out of Snowflake than it is to get out of any other SQL based RDBMS. If we were relying on the fact that we manage the files in S3 instead of the customer to keep our customers on board, we wouldn't have a business.

      I will grant that there's non-ANSI features in Snowflake that our competition don't offer, but it would be weird to describe "have awesome features" as being lock-in.

  • ta988

    Strong beliefs from investors. I don't think there is much rationality at play here.

  • danielmarkbruce

    They are doubling revenue every X months (currently about 12). And it's a big market and getting bigger, so they might be able to keep X pretty low for a pretty long time. They are adding customers + adding revenue at existing customers. Double revenue every 12 months and you get to 32x in 5 years. And it's pretty sticky.

    • blitzar

      From last nights call:

      For the full fiscal 2023, we expect product revenue between $1.88 billion and $1.9 billion, representing year-over-year growth between 65% and 67%.

      So growth slowing from 100% yoy, hence shares -20% pre market

      • danielmarkbruce

        Yup, it's interesting stuff. The efficiency claims (ie for customers) seems believable (like maybe 70% true?) so it will be interesting to see where those growth numbers go from here... up/down/sideways, it all seems very possible

talltofuOP

https://youtu.be/vDD7oKVkcCk

teruakohatu

I wonder what Plotly's valuation is. Surely more than Streamlit and they have only raised <$19 million.

vietvu

I was surprised by the number. Streamlit is good, but that amount of money is quite absurd, even in equity.

rovr138

Has anyone compared Streamlit and Anvil, http://anvil.works?

They look similar from the preview.

juancampa

Slightly off-topic but I wish there was a better term than "data" to describe these types of systems.

gotmedium

dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30533250

xiaodai

streamlit is a nifty ableit limited package. Well done.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection