Settings

Theme

Supreme Court blocks federal mandate for private workers to vaccinate or test

courthousenews.com

5 points by speedcoder 4 years ago · 6 comments

Reader

speedcoderOP 4 years ago

Ask HN: what does this mean for non-healthcare workers for federal contractors?

  • peteradio 4 years ago

    I believe it's unaffected by the ruling. It is working its way through appeals yet, latest judgement: https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/22a0002p-06.pd...

    • speedcoderOP 4 years ago

      Any idea when that may be heard by the Supreme Court?

      • peteradio 4 years ago

        Seems these things are moving pretty fast, but I'm just an amateur observer. Neither side seems motivated to protract the process.

  • speedcoderOP 4 years ago

    "All: please don't take HN threads into tedious flamewar on eternal flamewar topics. "Vax versus antivax" is one of the most tedious of them all. If you're tempted to post angrily about how wrong and bad the other side is, please inhibit that impulse. If your comment was going to repeat something we've all heard many times before, please don't post it.

    Obviously the vax theme is topical in this case—that makes this a good chance to apply discernment and distinguish between thoughtful, substantive comments and shallow, dismissive ones. As that is what we all should be doing on HN anyway, practice is good."

    Per dang https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dang on a previous similar post.

    HN guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

    • dekhn 4 years ago

      unless they edited things, their question is a simple and reasonable one.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection