Settings

Theme

Babylonian Multiplication in the shower (2016)

iquilezles.org

75 points by plancien · 15 comments

Reader

4 threads
plancienOP

I stumbled upon this old post from Iñigo Quilez, and this made my day. Especially because I did not know about the Babylonian multiplication, let alone its proof. The absence of explanation in the post made it into a nice puzzle, I had to figure things out by myself. Maths teaching should more often be like this kickstarted discovery...

  • RajuVarghese

    I spent some time looking at the geometric 'proof' in the photo. Was still wondering why this method would have any advantage over our conventional way of multiplying numbers because squaring would need multiplication too. Then I realized that with a table of squares one could do the calculation quite easily. To calculate the product of any 2 numbers from 1 to 100 one would need the squares of the numbers from 1 to 200. Armed with this one can calculate the product of any two numbers from 1 to 100 (there are 10'000 such combinations) with the formula. Sweet!

082349872349872

Related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words

Unfortunately the metamathematics of wordless proofs still needs words, maybe someone can make a proof theory without words?

https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/proofs-wit...

pubby

I made a helper image: https://i.imgur.com/CHYYhn6.png

krick

The idea would be more obvious if `a` woldn't be exactly `2b` in this example (granted, author wasn't at liberty to choose values). Being previously unaware of what is Babylonian multiplication, it took me quite some time to get what exactly is being conveyed. It is too tempting to read it as "2 x 1" in this case, which doesn't register as a very notable generic discovery. I suspect many people who would find it otherwise interesting simply passed by before understanding what he is trying to show us.

  • woofie11

    For those of us too lazy to think this through, do you care to post an explanation?

    • krick

      Sure, here you go.

      a — height of a white tile

      b — width of a white tile

      a x b — S₁, area of a white tile (this is what we are trying to "find")

      (a - b)² — S₀, area of a black square

      (a + b)² — S, area of a whole block (4 white tiles, 1 black tile)

      Now, looking at the image it is obvious, that (S - S₀) = 4S₁.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection