Settings

Theme

Time to #DeleteFacebook, Again

22 points by amineazariz 7 years ago · 19 comments · 1 min read


Someone has to start something new. Or maybe it's already the case ?

Who are your candidates to maybe replace Facebook ? Facebook replaced the MySpace, Hi5 and MSN of those times... Is there something cooking now that you think have the slightest chance to the same to Facebook ? Can we make a list of those.

PS: Please only submit little/unknown yet social-networks you know about. Not alternatives like: e-mail, phone, real-life networking etc.

Thank you.

simonhamp 7 years ago

How about no social networks? What are you looking for that Facebook gives/gave you?

  • virusduck 7 years ago

    The main use case some of my family members use it for is sharing pictures. I'm not keen on putting my children's pictures on a pseudo-public social network, so we make very ample use of Apple Photos. It won't work for everyone, but the people in my family who care (even the >80yo members) have iPhones and are capable of operating the Photos app. The nice thing is that there is commenting functionality and the shared albums don't count against your storage quota (AFAICT).

    I also tried Slack initially, with no real success.

    • simonhamp 7 years ago

      I've done much the same. I think ultimately when there's a solution that allows you to easily set up your own reliable 'self-hosted' solution, that will be the way to go.

      Not sure if anyone has done anything like that yet.

      Personal-private social networks (ultimate federation) could be the start of some really interesting innovations around proof of identity and ownership of (and ultimate value-generation from) data.

      I'd love to have a tool that was able to collect data that I think would be useful/that I'm prepared to collect and may choose to share, either for me directly to reuse or as a more tangible thing that I could share as I choose.

      For example, imagine collecting your browsing data in on a system that you control, completely private and secure by design but that allowed/provided tools for you to sell (safely) that data to companies. They'd get the data at a fair price, and you'd take an active part in the transaction instead of being a gormless observer as Google/Facebook sell it.

      A tool to give _you_ the power to extract the value out of _your_ data.

      And a platform to enable the kind of companies that have been paying billions to the likes of Google and Facebook to send a portion of it directly to you.

      I find this idea quite compelling.

      • virusduck 7 years ago

        I mentioned in another comment that ages ago I used to be cool and host my own photo sharing using Gallery [0]. I went by the website, and turns out they put the project to bed in 2014. The codebase for the latest version (which I never liked quite as much as the older ones) is still around [1] if anybody wants to move it forward. Oh, the nostalgia!

        [0] http://galleryproject.org/

        [1] https://github.com/gallery/gallery3

    • jimeh 7 years ago

      Personally I use Google Photos for that. It's better than Apple Photos cause there's native apps for both iOS and Android, and its web-interface is just as fully featured as the native apps, unlike Apple Photos' web interface that's kind of just a stripped down stream of recently added photos.

      • virusduck 7 years ago

        Yeah, that is a good solution too. I have tried to avoid Google Photos for some of the same reasons I avoid FB, but I think it is still a huge improvement over FB. Although Gphotos is not too hard to set up, I was compelled when my 82 year old aunt could figure out the stock Photos app herself. No Google account required.

        Also, you can view iCloud photo albums over the web too (although I don't think you can comment if you're not loggid in / on a iP([ao]d|hone)!

        Back in the pre-FB era, I used the PHP Gallery app. It was so hot at the time--I was the only one with a photo sharing site at my own domain.

        For a sort of intermediate approach, there is also Nextcloud Gallery for folks who want their stuff hosted on their terms but with (modern-ish) access and sharing controls. There's also iOS and Android Apps

      • irongeek 7 years ago

        IMO, if you really are worried about Facebook you should be equally worried about Google.

    • dplgk 7 years ago

      Email?

opan 7 years ago

The fediverse. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse

bovermyer 7 years ago

MeWe works pretty well and is developing at a pretty rapid pace.

axelrosen 7 years ago

I'm still bullish on Snapchat, but it needs to keep adding new features. It's the only social network that gets ephemerality.

I don't really see a reason to delete Facebook over the privacy drama, I fail to see how it has much to do with the management or anything. Any Facebook replacement one comes up with, would face all the same dilemmas.

What many outside of the privacy-conscious circles are tired of is this whole concept of everything being permanent online. Of having some behavior from years ago haunt you forever. There's where ephemerality comes in.

  • dmschulman 7 years ago

    Ephemeral content isn't a solution. The problem with any of these services is that your content, ephemeral or not, never actually goes away.

mental1896 7 years ago

https://joinmastodon.org/

amineazarizOP 7 years ago

Please can someone explain why this post was flagged ? (I’m not very familiar with the rules). Thanks.

stared 7 years ago

And why? I mean, which kind of problems with Facebook you want to mitigate? (Data privacy? Attention? Social isolation? Polarization?)

"A new Facebook" is likely to have the same pros, and cons, as the original one. Unless you are interested in this kind of problem-solving: https://xkcd.com/927/

PS: It should go with [Ask HN] in the title.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection