Http subversion URLs should be discontinued in favor of https URLs

It seems that the pro-https side argues "but it would be confidential against most hackers and also HTTPS!!!" while the anti-https side argues "but a statelevel attacker could still hack it so it's not 100% secure thusly a bad idea".

It would probably help if both sides actually tried to argue and discuss this instead of digging into the trenches and firing potshots at eachother.