A $13B Complaint
novackmedialaw.com
3 threads
This reads like a law firm trying to trigger the Streisand effect, not sure why I should care
> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan. [Huh?]
Why the huh? The author's own point 1 implied the suit was against JP Morgan.
> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.
Yes the author is asking for the document and believes it should be a non-issue because:
> 1) JPMorgan already has the document, so there is no element of surprise on the government's side.
To which the DOJ responds:
> 1) We didn't say we are suing JPMorgan.
Which is a bit of a confusing response.
Headline doesn't need the dollar sign and the word "dollar".