AI Application Security Baseline 1.0

4 min read Original article β†—

VERSION 1.0 β€’ JANUARY 2026

The minimum standard for shipping AI in production β€” 2026 and beyond. Open, free, and practical.

πŸ” Pre-Deployment Requirements

Complete these before any AI component goes to production.

βœ“

Threat Model AI Components

Document attack surfaces specific to your AI/LLM integration. Include data flows, trust boundaries, and potential abuse scenarios.

CRITICAL

βœ“

Prompt Injection Testing

Test for both direct (user input) and indirect (RAG/context) prompt injection vulnerabilities.

CRITICAL

βœ“

Output Validation Rules

Define and implement filtering for AI outputs. Block PII, code injection, harmful content, and policy violations.

HIGH

βœ“

Data Leakage Assessment

Test for training data extraction, PII disclosure, and sensitive business information leakage.

HIGH

βœ“

Jailbreak Resistance Testing

Verify system prompt protection against role-playing, encoding tricks, and instruction override attempts.

MEDIUM

βš™ CI/CD Integration

Automate security checks in your deployment pipeline.

βœ“

Automated Security Scan on Every PR

Run LLM security scans when AI-related code changes. Block merge if critical vulnerabilities found.

CRITICAL

βœ“

Security Gate Before Production

Require security sign-off for AI deployments. No production without passing security checks.

HIGH

βœ“

Scheduled Production Scans

Daily or weekly automated scans on live AI endpoints. Alert on new vulnerabilities.

MEDIUM

name: AI Security Scan on: [pull_request] jobs: security-scan: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: xsource-sec/agentaudit-action@v1 with: target: ${{ secrets.AI_ENDPOINT }} mode: full fail-on: critical,high

GitHub Action coming Q1 2026. For now, use AgentAudit web interface or API.

πŸ›‘ Runtime Protection

Protect your AI in production with these controls.

βœ“

Input Sanitization

Validate and sanitize all user prompts before sending to AI. Block known injection patterns.

CRITICAL

βœ“

Output Filtering

Scan AI responses for PII, code, harmful content before displaying to users.

CRITICAL

βœ“

Rate Limiting

Implement per-user and per-session limits. Prevent abuse and DoS attacks.

HIGH

βœ“

Anomaly Detection

Monitor for unusual patterns: token spikes, repeated jailbreak attempts, data exfiltration patterns.

MEDIUM

πŸ“‹ Compliance & Audit

Meet regulatory requirements and maintain audit trails.

βœ“

AI Interaction Logging

Log all prompts and responses (with appropriate PII handling). Retain for compliance period.

HIGH

βœ“

Incident Response Plan

Document procedures for AI security incidents: jailbreaks, data leaks, harmful outputs.

HIGH

βœ“

Regular Security Reviews

Quarterly review of AI security posture. Update threat model as capabilities change.

MEDIUM

🎯 OWASP LLM Top 10 Coverage

How this baseline maps to the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025).

ID Vulnerability Baseline Coverage AgentAudit
LLM01 Prompt Injection Pre-deployment testing, Runtime input sanitization βœ“ 200+ vectors
LLM02 Insecure Output Handling Output validation rules, Runtime filtering βœ“ Full
LLM03 Training Data Poisoning Threat modeling, Data assessment ◐ Partial
LLM04 Model Denial of Service Rate limiting, Anomaly detection βœ“ Full
LLM05 Supply Chain Vulnerabilities Security reviews, CI/CD scanning ◐ Partial
LLM06 Sensitive Information Disclosure Data leakage assessment, Output filtering βœ“ Full
LLM07 Insecure Plugin Design Threat modeling, MCP/RAG security βœ“ MCP Scanner
LLM08 Excessive Agency Threat modeling, Runtime controls βœ“ Agent Scanner
LLM09 Overreliance Output validation, Human review processes ◐ Partial
LLM10 Model Theft Access controls, Audit logging ◐ Partial

πŸ—Ί Framework Mapping

How this baseline aligns with major compliance frameworks.

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί EU AI Act

Risk assessment, documentation, human oversight, and transparency requirements for high-risk AI systems.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ NIST AI RMF

Map, Measure, Manage framework for AI risk. Covers governance, security, and trustworthiness.

πŸ”’ SOC 2

Security, availability, and confidentiality controls extended to AI systems.

πŸ“œ ISO 27001

Information security controls applied to AI data handling and processing.

πŸ₯ HIPAA

PHI protection requirements for AI systems handling healthcare data.

πŸ’³ PCI DSS

Payment data security requirements for AI processing cardholder information.