Ranked: Where the iPhone Costs the Most in 2026
Key Takeaways
- Türkiye is the world’s most expensive place to buy an iPhone 17 Pro (256GB), with a retail price of $2,592.
- The same model costs more than twice as much in Türkiye as it does in Japan, the cheapest market in the comparison.
- Taxes, import duties, currency movements, and local regulations can add hundreds of dollars to an iPhone’s retail price.
Apple sells the same flagship smartphone worldwide, but its retail price varies significantly by market.
This graphic compares the price of Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro (256GB) across 41 markets in 2026 using data from Deutsche Bank.
The World’s Most Expensive Place to Buy an iPhone
Türkiye tops the ranking at $2,592, more than $1,400 above the U.S. price of $1,181. Brazil ranks second at $2,260, while Egypt follows at $1,872.
At the other end of the ranking, Japan has the lowest price in the comparison at $1,121, slightly below U.S. pricing. The wide gap shows how taxes, import policies, and local market conditions can outweigh the global pricing strategy of one of the world’s leading smartphone brands.
| Rank | Country | iPhone 17 Pro 256GB (USD) | Price relative to the U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇹🇷 Türkiye | $2,592 | 219% |
| 2 | 🇧🇷 Brazil | $2,260 | 191% |
| 3 | 🇪🇬 Egypt | $1,872 | 158% |
| 4 | 🇭🇺 Hungary | $1,826 | 155% |
| 5 | 🇳🇴 Norway | $1,687 | 143% |
| 6 | 🇲🇽 Mexico | $1,657 | 140% |
| 7 | 🇸🇪 Sweden | $1,601 | 135% |
| 8 | 🇵🇱 Poland | $1,588 | 134% |
| 9 | 🇨🇿 Czechia | $1,585 | 134% |
| 10 | 🇫🇮 Finland | $1,578 | 134% |
| 11 | 🇵🇹 Portugal | $1,566 | 133% |
| 12 | 🇬🇷 Greece | $1,566 | 133% |
| 13 | 🇮🇹 Italy | $1,554 | 132% |
| 14 | 🇮🇪 Ireland | $1,554 | 132% |
| 15 | 🇩🇰 Denmark | $1,553 | 131% |
| 16 | 🇫🇷 France | $1,543 | 131% |
| 17 | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | $1,543 | 131% |
| 18 | 🇧🇪 Belgium | $1,543 | 131% |
| 19 | 🇪🇸 Spain | $1,531 | 130% |
| 20 | 🇦🇹 Austria | $1,508 | 128% |
| 21 | 🇩🇪 Germany | $1,508 | 128% |
| 22 | 🇱🇺 Luxembourg | $1,492 | 126% |
| 23 | 🇬🇧 UK | $1,476 | 125% |
| 24 | 🇮🇳 India | $1,427 | 121% |
| 25 | 🇦🇺 Australia | $1,413 | 120% |
| 26 | 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | $1,386 | 117% |
| 27 | 🇨🇭 Switzerland | $1,385 | 117% |
| 28 | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | $1,370 | 116% |
| 29 | 🇸🇬 Singapore | $1,364 | 115% |
| 30 | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | $1,352 | 114% |
| 31 | 🇹🇭 Thailand | $1,350 | 114% |
| 32 | 🇨🇳 China | $1,332 | 113% |
| 33 | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | $1,330 | 113% |
| 34 | 🇵🇭 Philippines | $1,326 | 112% |
| 35 | 🇨🇦 Canada | $1,291 | 109% |
| 36 | 🇦🇪 UAE | $1,279 | 108% |
| 37 | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | $1,264 | 107% |
| 38 | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | $1,200 | 102% |
| 39 | 🇺🇸 United States | $1,181 | 100% |
| 40 | 🇰🇷 South Korea | $1,181 | 100% |
| 41 | 🇯🇵 Japan | $1,121 | 95% |
Europe accounts for much of the ranking’s upper half, partly because advertised prices include value-added tax (VAT). Standard VAT rates range from 27% in Hungary to just over 8% in Switzerland, contributing to substantial differences in final retail prices.
Why Do iPhone Prices Vary So Much?
Apple establishes regional prices, but governments also play a major role in determining what consumers pay.
Import duties, regulatory fees, and device-specific taxes can significantly increase the retail price of electronics. Currency movements also affect local pricing, particularly when domestic currencies weaken against the U.S. dollar.
Türkiye is the clearest outlier. In addition to a 20% VAT, smartphones are subject to special consumption taxes and registration fees that sharply increase their retail prices.
Why Japan Is One of the Cheapest Markets
Japan is one of the few markets where Apple’s flagship iPhone costs less than it does in the United States.
A relatively low 10% consumption tax, a highly competitive smartphone market, and Apple’s long-standing pricing strategy have helped keep prices comparatively low. Even so, Apple has recently raised prices on some products in Japan following years of yen weakness and shifting exchange rates.
Global price rankings can change quickly. As currencies fluctuate and governments adjust taxes and import policies, today’s cheapest market may not hold that position for long.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on how Apple makes its money.
Digital Transformation
Mapped: Where Innovation Is Thriving Across America
Discover America’s most innovative states, ranked by patents, venture capital investment, and R&D spending per capita.
Published
1 week ago
on
July 28, 2026
Mapped: Where Innovation Is Thriving Across America
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Key Takeaways
- California ranks first by a wide margin, driven by its strength in patents, venture capital, and R&D spending.
- Six Western states place in the top 10, forming an “Innovation Belt” from the Pacific Coast to the Mountain West.
- The ranking combines patents, venture capital investment, and research spending to measure innovation activity across all 50 states.
Innovation shapes where new companies are built, breakthrough technologies emerge, and high-paying jobs are created. Across the U.S., however, that activity is concentrated in a relatively small group of states.
This map ranks all 50 states using a composite score based on patents per capita in 2025, venture capital deal value per capita in 2025, and research and development expenditures per capita in 2023.
The data for this visualization comes from SmartAsset.
California Leads by a Wide Margin
California tops the ranking with a composite score of 95.2, nearly 20 points ahead of second-place Massachusetts.
| Rank | State | Most Innovative (0-100) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 95.2 |
| 2 | Massachusetts | 75.2 |
| 3 | Delaware | 57.3 |
| 4 | Washington | 51.8 |
| 5 | Oregon | 37.2 |
| 6 | Colorado | 33.6 |
| 7 | Connecticut | 32.6 |
| 8 | Wyoming | 31.9 |
| 9 | Minnesota | 31.1 |
| 10 | Idaho | 29.8 |
| 11 | New Hampshire | 29.4 |
| 12 | Michigan | 28.1 |
| 13 | New York | 27.1 |
| 14 | Vermont | 25.0 |
| 15 | Utah | 24.1 |
| 16 | North Carolina | 23.5 |
| 17 | Maryland | 22.2 |
| 18 | Illinois | 21.8 |
| 19 | Wisconsin | 21.4 |
| 20 | Virginia | 20.6 |
| 21 | New Jersey | 19.8 |
| 22 | New Mexico | 18.6 |
| 23 | Arizona | 18.4 |
| 24 | Rhode Island | 18.2 |
| 25 | Iowa | 17.7 |
| 26 | Texas | 17.7 |
| 27 | Ohio | 17.6 |
| 28 | Pennsylvania | 17.4 |
| 29 | Nevada | 16.5 |
| 30 | North Dakota | 15.4 |
| 31 | Indiana | 14.6 |
| 32 | Montana | 13.6 |
| 33 | Missouri | 12.0 |
| 34 | Kansas | 11.8 |
| 35 | Georgia | 11.4 |
| 36 | Florida | 10.5 |
| 37 | Tennessee | 8.8 |
| 38 | Nebraska | 8.2 |
| 39 | South Carolina | 6.7 |
| 40 | Alabama | 5.4 |
| 41 | Oklahoma | 5.2 |
| 42 | South Dakota | 5.1 |
| 43 | Kentucky | 4.7 |
| 44 | Maine | 4.7 |
| 45 | Arkansas | 3.0 |
| 46 | Hawaii | 2.8 |
| 47 | Louisiana | 1.9 |
| 48 | West Virginia | 0.5 |
| 49 | Alaska | 0.4 |
| 50 | Mississippi | 0.1 |
The state produces 129 patents per 100,000 residents, attracts nearly $5,000 in venture capital investment per person, and spends more than $7,100 per capita on research and development.
California’s advantage extends beyond Silicon Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area. Southern California’s technology, aerospace, and biotech hubs also contribute to the state’s innovation ecosystem.
Together, these regions bring major technology companies, leading research universities, and venture-backed startups into close proximity, reinforcing investment and new business formation.
| Most Innovative | Patents per 100K residents | VC deal value (per capita) | R&D expenditures (per capita) |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 129 | $4,920 | $7,105 |
| Massachusetts | 106 | $2,324 | $9,688 |
| Delaware | 63 | $3,772 | $5,796 |
| Washington | 80 | $938 | $7,443 |
| Oregon | 75 | $320 | $2,675 |
Massachusetts ranks second, supported by exceptional R&D spending and a dense concentration of universities, biotech firms, and research institutions around Boston and Cambridge.
Delaware rounds out the top three, boosted by unusually high venture capital investment relative to its population.
The West Forms America’s Innovation Belt
Six Western states rank in the top 10: California, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Wyoming, and Idaho.
Their strong performance reflects expanding startup ecosystems, skilled engineering workforces, and close ties between universities and private industry.
Some neighboring states have also attracted companies seeking lower operating costs while retaining access to talent and venture funding.
Washington’s fourth-place finish is supported by major employers such as Microsoft and Amazon, while Oregon stands out for its patent activity and technology manufacturing base.
Innovation Gaps Remain Across the Country
Mississippi, Alaska, West Virginia, Louisiana, and Hawaii record the lowest composite scores in the ranking.
| Least Innovative | Patents per 100K residents | VC deal value (per capita) | R&D expenditures (per capita) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | 8 | $78 | $748 |
| Louisiana | 8 | $18 | $422 |
| West Virginia | 5 | $2 | $413 |
| Alaska | 4 | $12 | $581 |
| Mississippi | 4 | $2 | $435 |
These states tend to lag across all three measures, producing fewer patents while attracting less venture capital and research investment per resident.
As industries such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and advanced manufacturing expand, states that strengthen their innovation ecosystems may be better positioned for future economic growth.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the jobs most exposed to AI.
Innovation
Mapped: The World’s Top Innovation Clusters
Discover the world’s top innovation clusters in 2025, from Silicon Valley to Shenzhen, and see where global breakthroughs are happening.
Published
1 month ago
on
June 24, 2026
Mapped: The World’s Top Innovation Clusters
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Key Takeaways:
- China hosts 24 of the world’s top 100 innovation clusters, surpassing the U.S. (22) for the largest number of leading hubs.
- The world’s top 10 innovation clusters generate nearly 40% of global patent filings, showing how concentrated global innovation has become.
- Just 33 economies account for all 100 leading clusters, which together represent roughly 70% of global patent applications and venture capital activity.
Innovation is often discussed at the national level, but breakthrough technologies tend to emerge from smaller geographic hubs where researchers, startups, investors, and established companies interact closely.
Using data from the World Intellectual Property Organization’s (WIPO) Global Innovation Index 2025, this graphic ranks the world’s top innovation clusters based on scientific publications, international patent filings, and venture capital activity.
The rankings highlight where research, capital, and entrepreneurship are combining to create the world’s most influential innovation ecosystems.
Where Are the World’s Top Innovation Clusters?
The table below shows the world’s leading innovation clusters according to WIPO’s 2025 rankings.
| Rank | Innovation Cluster | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou | 🇨🇳 🇭🇰 China / Hong Kong |
| 2 | Tokyo–Yokohama | 🇯🇵 Japan |
| 3 | San Jose–San Francisco | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 4 | Beijing | 🇨🇳 China |
| 5 | Seoul | 🇰🇷 South Korea |
| 6 | Shanghai–Suzhou | 🇨🇳 China |
| 7 | New York City | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 8 | London | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom |
| 9 | Boston–Cambridge | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 10 | Los Angeles | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 11 | Osaka–Kobe–Kyoto | 🇯🇵 Japan |
| 12 | Paris | 🇫🇷 France |
| 13 | Hangzhou | 🇨🇳 China |
| 14 | San Diego | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 15 | Nanjing | 🇨🇳 China |
| 16 | Singapore | 🇸🇬 🇲🇾 Singapore / Malaysia |
| 17 | Washington–Baltimore | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 18 | Wuhan | 🇨🇳 China |
| 19 | Tel Aviv–Jerusalem | 🇮🇱 Israel |
| 20 | Seattle | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 21 | Bengaluru | 🇮🇳 India |
| 22 | Amsterdam–Rotterdam | 🇳🇱 Netherlands |
| 23 | Philadelphia | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 24 | Chengdu | 🇨🇳 China |
| 25 | Daejeon | 🇰🇷 South Korea |
| 26 | Delhi | 🇮🇳 India |
| 27 | Munich | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| 28 | Nagoya | 🇯🇵 Japan |
| 29 | Xi'an | 🇨🇳 China |
| 30 | Berlin | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| 31 | Chicago | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 32 | Stockholm | 🇸🇪 Sweden |
| 33 | Toronto | 🇨🇦 Canada |
| 34 | Qingdao | 🇨🇳 China |
| 35 | Denver | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 36 | Sydney | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| 37 | Austin | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 38 | Houston | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 39 | Hefei | 🇨🇳 China |
| 40 | Zürich | 🇨🇭 Switzerland |
| 41 | Taipei–Hsinchu | 🇹🇼 Taiwan* |
| 42 | Copenhagen | 🇩🇰 Denmark |
| 43 | Cologne | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| 44 | Changsha | 🇨🇳 China |
| 45 | Barcelona | 🇪🇸 Spain |
| 46 | Mumbai | 🇮🇳 India |
| 47 | Madrid | 🇪🇸 Spain |
| 48 | Moscow | 🇷🇺 Russia |
| 49 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
| 50 | Tianjin | 🇨🇳 China |
| 51 | Minneapolis | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 52 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| 53 | Raleigh | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 54 | Stuttgart | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| 55 | Brussels–Antwerp | 🇧🇪 Belgium |
| 56 | Milan | 🇮🇹 Italy |
| 57 | Chongqing | 🇨🇳 China |
| 58 | Istanbul | 🇹🇷 Turkey |
| 59 | Atlanta | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 60 | Helsinki | 🇫🇮 Finland |
| 61 | Dallas | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 62 | Montréal | 🇨🇦 Canada |
| 63 | Tehran | 🇮🇷 Iran |
| 64 | Frankfurt am Main | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| 65 | Eindhoven | 🇳🇱 Netherlands |
| 66 | Vancouver | 🇨🇦 Canada |
| 67 | Miami | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 68 | Jinan | 🇨🇳 China |
| 69 | Cambridge | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom |
| 70 | Harbin | 🇨🇳 China |
| 71 | Dublin | 🇮🇪 Ireland |
| 72 | Changchun | 🇨🇳 China |
| 73 | Portland | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 74 | Vienna | 🇦🇹 Austria |
| 75 | Shenyang | 🇨🇳 China |
| 76 | Pittsburgh | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 77 | Oxford | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom |
| 78 | Phoenix | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 79 | Mexico City | 🇲🇽 Mexico |
| 80 | Zhengzhou | 🇨🇳 China |
| 81 | Xiamen | 🇨🇳 China |
| 82 | Rome | 🇮🇹 Italy |
| 83 | Cairo | 🇪🇬 Egypt |
| 84 | Chennai | 🇮🇳 India |
| 85 | Oslo | 🇳🇴 Norway |
| 86 | Kuala Lumpur | 🇲🇾 Malaysia |
| 87 | Heidelberg–Mannheim | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| 88 | Dalian | 🇨🇳 China |
| 89 | Warsaw | 🇵🇱 Poland |
| 90 | Lyon | 🇫🇷 France |
| 91 | Hamburg | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| 92 | Salt Lake City | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 93 | Ningbo | 🇨🇳 China |
| 94 | Manchester | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom |
| 95 | Busan | 🇰🇷 South Korea |
| 96 | Ann Arbor | 🇺🇸 United States |
| 97 | Göteborg | 🇸🇪 Sweden |
| 98 | Macau–Zhuhai | 🇨🇳 China |
| 99 | Ningde | 🇨🇳 China |
| 100 | Zhenjiang | 🇨🇳 China |
China and the U.S. dominate the rankings, while innovation hotspots in Japan, South Korea, Europe, and India also feature prominently.
Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou claims the top spot globally, followed by Tokyo–Yokohama and Silicon Valley’s San Jose–San Francisco corridor.
Unlike city rankings, WIPO’s clusters often span multiple metropolitan areas and even national borders. The organization uses a bottom-up methodology that identifies regions with dense concentrations of inventors and scientific authors, rather than relying on political boundaries. As a result, clusters often represent entire innovation ecosystems rather than individual cities.
The Concentration of Innovation
Innovation clusters emerge because talent, capital, and institutions tend to reinforce one another. Leading research universities attract scientists, successful startups attract investors, and large technology firms create opportunities for commercialization. Over time, these advantages compound.
This dynamic helps explain why a handful of regions consistently dominate global innovation. Silicon Valley benefits from world-class universities, deep venture capital markets, and a culture of entrepreneurship. Similarly, China’s leading clusters have been supported by sustained investment in research, advanced manufacturing, and technology commercialization.
The concentration of innovation has become an increasingly important factor in global economic competition. Recent analysis from Foreign Affairs argues that technological leadership is now a central pillar of geopolitical power, while research from CSIS highlights how government-supported R&D ecosystems can accelerate innovation capacity.
China’s Rise Reshapes the Innovation Map
One of the most notable trends in recent years has been the rapid rise of Chinese innovation clusters. Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou now ranks as the world’s leading cluster, while Beijing and Shanghai–Suzhou also place among the global elite. China hosts more top-100 clusters than any other economy.
At the same time, the U.S. remains a dominant force in commercialization and venture capital. New York, Los Angeles, Boston, Seattle, and Silicon Valley continue to rank among the world’s most influential innovation ecosystems. In areas such as artificial intelligence innovation, American clusters continue to attract a disproportionate share of global investment and entrepreneurial activity.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
To see how innovation leadership has evolved over centuries, and what today’s leading clusters might signal about the future, check out Long Waves: The History of Innovation Cycles on the Voronoi app.