Mapped: Income Needed to Live Comfortably in U.S. Cities
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Key Takeaways
- A family of four needs more than $400,000 annually to live comfortably in both San Francisco and San Jose.
- California is home to six of the 10 highest-income cities in the ranking.
- Even the most affordable city analyzed still requires nearly $200,000 under the 50/30/20 budgeting rule.
This map ranks 56 major U.S. cities by the annual income a family of four needs to live comfortably.
Using data from SmartAsset, based on the MIT Living Wage Calculator updated in February 2026, the estimates apply the 50/30/20 budgeting framework: 50% of income for necessities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings.
The results highlight how much the cost of maintaining the same standard of living varies across the country.
Bay Area Cities Lead the Ranking
San Francisco tops the ranking, with a family of four needing about $408,000 annually to live comfortably.
Nearby San Jose follows at roughly $403,000, while Oakland ranks third at $371,000.
| Rank | City | Family Income Need to Live Confortably |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Francisco, CA | $407,597 |
| 2 | San Jose, CA | $402,771 |
| 3 | Oakland, CA | $371,488 |
| 4 | Boston, MA | $368,742 |
| 5 | Arlington, VA | $368,326 |
| 6 | New York, NY | $337,875 |
| 7 | Seattle, WA | $334,131 |
| 8 | Irvine, CA | $327,226 |
| 9 | Honolulu, HI | $321,069 |
| 10 | Washington, DC | $319,405 |
| 11 | Portland, OR | $313,747 |
| 12 | San Diego, CA | $312,915 |
| 13 | Denver, CO | $303,514 |
| 14 | Jersey City, NJ | $297,606 |
| 15 | Minneapolis, MN | $288,787 |
| 16 | Anchorage, AK | $285,210 |
| 17 | Los Angeles, CA | $281,466 |
| 18 | Sacramento, CA | $279,802 |
| 19 | Newark, NJ | $278,221 |
| 20 | St. Paul, MN | $278,221 |
| 21 | Riverside, CA | $270,566 |
| 22 | Colorado Springs, CO | $270,566 |
| 23 | Tacoma, WA | $264,742 |
| 24 | Madison, WI | $263,245 |
| 25 | Philadelphia, PA | $252,845 |
| 26 | Reno, NV | $251,264 |
| 27 | Boise, ID | $251,181 |
| 28 | Raleigh, NC | $249,434 |
| 29 | Buffalo, NY | $247,853 |
| 30 | Indianapolis, IN | $247,021 |
| 31 | Phoenix, AZ | $245,523 |
| 32 | Chicago, IL | $242,278 |
| 33 | Charlotte, NC | $241,446 |
| 34 | Pittsburgh, PA | $238,534 |
| 35 | Columbus, OH | $238,534 |
| 36 | Durham, NC | $237,619 |
| 37 | Virginia Beach, VA | $237,702 |
| 38 | Atlanta, GA | $232,378 |
| 39 | Omaha, NE | $232,294 |
| 40 | Miami, FL | $231,130 |
| 41 | Kansas City, MO | $230,131 |
| 42 | Plano, TX | $230,464 |
| 43 | Austin, TX | $229,050 |
| 44 | Tampa, FL | $226,720 |
| 45 | Baltimore, MD | $224,224 |
| 46 | Richmond, VA | $223,974 |
| 47 | Fort Worth, TX | $217,235 |
| 48 | Tulsa, OK | $215,238 |
| 49 | Dallas, TX | $214,490 |
| 50 | Orlando, FL | $214,157 |
| 51 | Nashville, TN | $213,408 |
| 52 | Jacksonville, FL | $211,578 |
| 53 | Houston, TX | $204,672 |
| 54 | New Orleans, LA | $197,766 |
| 55 | Memphis, TN | $193,939 |
| 56 | San Antonio, TX | $192,608 |
High housing costs are the biggest driver behind these income requirements. California dominates the top of the ranking, with six cities appearing among the 10 most expensive places for families.
The Northeast and Pacific Coast Remain Costly
Boston, Arlington, New York, Seattle, Honolulu, and Washington, D.C. also rank among the most expensive cities.
These metro areas combine high housing costs with above-average expenses for transportation, childcare, and other necessities.
Many of these cities also offer higher wages than the national average, but elevated living costs often offset those income gains.
Southern Cities Offer Lower Income Thresholds
The lowest income requirements are concentrated in the South.
San Antonio ranks last, requiring about $193,000 for a family of four to live comfortably, followed by Memphis, New Orleans, and Houston.
The ranking highlights how expensive “living comfortably” has become across the United States. Under the 50/30/20 budgeting framework, every metro area analyzed requires a six-figure household income, with the highest-cost cities demanding more than $400,000 per year.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The States Where Housing Prices Have Surged the Most (2021–2026) on Voronoi.
Money
Ranked: The Income Needed to Be Happy in 19 Canadian Cities
Victoria has Canada’s highest price of happiness at $169,951 CAD a year, narrowly ahead of Vancouver and Toronto, which tie at $166,982.
Published
21 hours ago
on
August 2, 2026
Ranked: The Income Needed to Be Happy in 19 Canadian Cities
Key Takeaways
- Victoria has Canada’s highest happiness threshold at $169,951 CAD per year, narrowly ahead of Vancouver and Toronto, which tie at $166,982.
- Saskatoon and Calgary rank fourth and fifth, respectively, ahead of larger cities including Ottawa and Montreal.
- The highest threshold is just 21% above the lowest, compared with a 60% gap between New York and Cincinnati in the U.S.
Researchers call it the satiation point: the income level beyond which additional earnings no longer improve a person’s overall life evaluation. The threshold varies by location and, among the Canadian cities analyzed, is highest in Victoria.
This graphic ranks 19 major Canadian cities by their estimated income satiation point using data from Remitly.
Remitly adapted Purdue University research on income satiation, adjusting for purchasing power and inflation before scaling Canada’s national figure to each city using Numbeo’s cost-of-living index. Figures are in Canadian dollars and current as of March 2026.
Victoria Edges Out Vancouver and Toronto
Victoria’s threshold of $169,951 CAD ($124,047 USD) is less than 2% higher than the $166,982 CAD ($121,881 USD) shared by Vancouver and Toronto, making the top three effectively a three-way tie.
The table below shows the estimated income needed for happiness in each city and how much higher Victoria’s threshold is by comparison.
| Rank | City | Province | Price of Happiness (CAD) | Victoria Premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Victoria | BC | $169,951 | — |
| 2 | Vancouver | BC | $166,982 | +1.8% |
| 2 | Toronto | ON | $166,982 | +1.8% |
| 4 | Saskatoon | SK | $159,808 | +6.3% |
| 5 | Calgary | AB | $159,561 | +6.5% |
| 6 | Kitchener | ON | $159,066 | +6.8% |
| 7 | Guelph | ON | $157,829 | +7.7% |
| 8 | Halifax | NS | $156,592 | +8.5% |
| 9 | Kelowna | BC | $156,098 | +8.9% |
| 10 | Regina | SK | $155,850 | +9.0% |
| 11 | Mississauga | ON | $154,366 | +10.1% |
| 12 | Edmonton | AB | $153,624 | +10.6% |
| 13 | Ottawa | ON | $152,634 | +11.3% |
| 14 | Quebec City | QC | $149,913 | +13.4% |
| 15 | Montreal | QC | $148,181 | +14.7% |
| 16 | London | ON | $147,934 | +14.9% |
| 16 | Winnipeg | MB | $147,934 | +14.9% |
| 18 | Hamilton | ON | $145,708 | +16.6% |
| 19 | Kingston | ON | $140,513 | +21.0% |
Victoria’s top ranking reflects its high everyday costs. Living Wage BC puts the city’s 2025 living wage at $27.40 per hour, $9.55 above the provincial minimum wage, with housing, food, and child care among the fastest-growing expenses.
British Columbia is the only province with two cities in the top three. Kelowna gives the province a third entry in the top 10, ranking ninth at $156,098.
For context, Remitly estimates Canada’s national happiness threshold at $113,755 USD. Victoria sits about 9% above that figure, while the U.S. national threshold of $134,827 USD is nearly one-fifth higher.
Prairie cities also place near the top. Saskatoon ranks fourth at $159,808, while Calgary ranks fifth at $159,561. Both finish ahead of Ottawa in 13th at $152,634 and Montreal in 15th at $148,181. Montreal’s lower threshold reflects its comparatively affordable housing costs, an advantage that also appears in rankings of the world’s most and least livable cities in 2026.
A Much Narrower Spread Than the U.S.
At the other end of the ranking, Kingston has the lowest happiness threshold at $140,513 CAD ($102,560 USD). Ontario is the most represented province, with eight of the 19 cities spanning nearly the full ranking, from Toronto in second place to Kingston in last.
The gap between the highest and lowest thresholds is just 21%. By comparison, the same Remitly analysis found New York’s threshold to be 60% higher than Cincinnati’s in the United States, while London’s is 38.7% higher than Sheffield’s in the United Kingdom.
The figures do not represent recommended salaries, direct measures of happiness, or conventional cost-of-living estimates. Instead, they estimate the income level at which additional earnings stop improving overall life evaluation. A higher threshold generally signals a more expensive city, not a happier one.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Money Can Buy Happiness After All on Voronoi.
Economy
Ranked: The World’s Most Livable Regions in 2026
Western Europe remains the world’s most livable region, narrowly ahead of North America.
Published
4 days ago
on
July 30, 2026
Ranked: The World’s Most Livable Regions in 2026
Key Takeaways
- Western Europe remains the world’s most livable region, narrowly ahead of North America.
- Asia recorded the biggest improvement in 2026, while the Middle East and North Africa saw the steepest regional decline.
- Regional scores range from 92 in Western Europe to 55 in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Each year, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) evaluates living conditions across major cities worldwide using its Global Liveability Index.
This regional comparison aggregates those city scores to show how livability varies across seven major regions in 2026.
The data for this visualization comes from the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Global Liveability Index. The index measures stability, healthcare, culture and environment, education, and infrastructure, then aggregates the results into regional averages on a scale of 0 to 100.
Western Europe and North America Continue to Lead
Western Europe ranked as the world’s most livable region in 2026 with an overall score of 92, closely followed by North America at 90.
| Region | Liveability | Stability | Healthcare | Culture & environment | Education | Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asia | 74 | 76 | 76 | 67 | 82 | 74 |
| North America | 90 | 85 | 92 | 90 | 100 | 92 |
| Western Europe | 92 | 86 | 95 | 92 | 96 | 93 |
| Eastern Europe | 71 | 70 | 71 | 70 | 81 | 70 |
| Latin America | 67 | 58 | 68 | 75 | 80 | 63 |
| Middle East & N. Africa | 61 | 55 | 68 | 52 | 78 | 64 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 55 | 49 | 47 | 65 | 65 | 51 |
Both regions performed particularly well in healthcare, education, and infrastructure. North America received a perfect score of 100 in education, while Western Europe recorded the highest healthcare and infrastructure scores.
Stable institutions, mature public services, and extensive transportation networks continue to support high living standards across many cities in both regions.
Asia Records the Biggest Improvement
Asia posted the largest year-over-year improvement among all regions, reaching an average livability score of 74.
According to the EIU, stronger performances by cities in China and Japan helped drive the gains.
Despite this progress, Asia continues to trail Western Europe and North America. Its lowest category score was in culture and environment, while infrastructure performance varied across its rapidly developing economies.
Conflict and Development Gaps Shape the Bottom of the Rankings
The Middle East and North Africa experienced the largest regional decline in 2026, with its average score falling by one point following the Iran war.
Stability remained the region’s weakest category, contributing to an overall score of 61.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranked last with a score of 55. Healthcare, infrastructure, and stability were its lowest-scoring categories.
Latin America and Eastern Europe occupied the middle of the rankings. Both posted relatively strong education scores, but weaker stability results held down their overall averages.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out How Happy Are the World’s Population Giants? on Voronoi.