Decided
Holding
The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded, because neither the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 11th Circuit nor the 5th Circuit conducted a proper analysis of the facial First Amendment challenges to the Florida and Texas laws regulating large internet platforms.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Elena Kagan on Jul 1, 2024. Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett joined in full, and in which Justice Jackson joined as to Parts I, II, and III-A. Justice Barrett filed a concurring opinion. Justice Jackson filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justices Thomas and Gorsuch joined.
Proceedings & orders timeline
Jan 4, 2023
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
Jan 23, 2023
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Aug 30, 2023
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
Sep 29, 2023
Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the Solicitor General in her brief for the United States as amicus curiae.
Oct 10, 2023
The following briefing schedule is adopted: Respondents in No. 22-277 and petitioners in No. 22-555 shall file opening briefs on the merits on or before Thursday, November 30, 2023, and the briefs shall bear a light blue cover. Any brief of an amicus curiae in support or in support of neither party shall be filed on or before Thursday, December 7, 2023, and the brief shall bear a light green cover. Petitioners in No. 22-277 and respondents in No. 22-555 shall file response briefs on the merits on or before Tuesday, January 16, 2024, and those briefs shall bear a light red cover. Any brief of an amicus curiae in support shall be filed on or before Tuesday, January 23, 2024, and the briefs shall bear a dark green cover. Reply briefs shall be filed in compliance with Rule 25.3, and the briefs shall bear a yellow cover. An amicus curiae shall file only a single brief in these cases.
Dec 6, 2023
Amicus brief of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in Support of Neither Party not accepted for filing. (Corrected version submitted--December 14, 2023)
Dec 7, 2023
Amicus brief of Amicus Curiae International Center for Law & Economics not accepted for filing. (Corrected electronic and paper format to be submitted--December 11, 2023)
Jan 5, 2024
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, February 26, 2024.
Jan 10, 2024
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 18, 2024
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
Jan 19, 2024
Record requested from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
Jan 30, 2024
Record received from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The record is electronic and is available with the Clerk.
Feb 16, 2024
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Feb 26, 2024
Argued. For petitioners: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.; and Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Aaron L. Nielson, Solicitor General, Austin, Tex.
Jul 1, 2024
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined in full, and in which Jackson, J., joined as to Parts I, II and III-A. Barrett, J., filed a concurring opinion. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Thomas and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. (Opinion together with No. 22-277).
Recommended Citation: NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/netchoice-llc-v-paxton/