Editor’s summary
From athletes like Simone Biles and Michael Phelps to scientists like Marie Curie and Albert Einstein, identifying exceptional talent is essential in the science of innovation. But how does talent originate? Did the most talented athletes, scientists, and musicians reach peak performance relatively early or late in their career? Did they forgo mastering multiple sports, academic subjects, and musical instruments to reach world-class performance in only one? In an Analytical Review, Güllich et al. looked at published research in science, music, chess, and sports and found two patterns: Exceptional young performers reached their peak quickly but narrowly mastered only one interest (e.g., one sport). By contrast, exceptional adults reached peak performance gradually with broader, multidisciplinary practice. However, elite programs are designed to nurture younger talent. —Ekeoma Uzogara
Structured Abstract
BACKGROUND
Exceptional performers push the boundaries of human capability, drive innovation, and help solve the world’s most pressing problems. For decades, research on the acquisition of human performance across domains (e.g., science, academia, music, sports, and chess) has primarily been conducted with young and sub-elite performers. This research suggested that, within these populations, higher early performance and larger amounts of discipline-specific practice generally are predictors of better later performance. Correspondingly, many elite schools, universities, conservatories, and youth sport academies around the world typically aim to select the top-performing young people and then seek to further accelerate their performance through intensified discipline-specific practice. Given that previous expertise research largely focused on young performers and that many elite training programs aim to select the top-performing young people, two critical questions arise: (i) Are exceptional performers at young ages and at later peak performance age largely the same individuals? And (ii) do predictors of young exceptional performance also predict later exceptional peak performance? Until recently, these questions were not systematically investigated among the world’s best performers across domains.
ADVANCES
In recent years, research on the acquisition of exceptional performance has progressed. Several large datasets from adult world-class performers have become available to review and synthesize. The present literature review synthesizes findings on the development of more than 34,000 adult international top performers in different domains, including Nobel laureates, the most renowned classical music composers, Olympic champions, and the world’s best chess players. The available evidence suggests a common pattern across domains with three major features. (i) Early exceptional performers and later exceptional performers within a domain are rarely the same individuals but are largely discrete populations over time. For example, world top-10 youth chess players and later world top-10 adult chess players are nearly 90% different individuals across time. Top secondary students and later top university students are also nearly 90% different people. Likewise, international-level youth athletes and later international-level adult athletes are nearly 90% different individuals. (ii) Most top achievers (Nobel laureates and world-class musicians, athletes, and chess players) demonstrated lower performance than many peers during their early years. Across the highest adult performance levels, peak performance is negatively correlated with early performance. (iii) The pattern of predictors that distinguishes among the highest levels of adult performance is different from the pattern of predictors of early performance. Higher early performance in a domain is associated with larger amounts of discipline-specific practice, smaller amounts of multidisciplinary practice, and faster early discipline-specific performance progress. By contrast, across high levels of adult performance, world-class performance in a domain is associated with smaller amounts of discipline-specific practice, larger amounts of early multidisciplinary practice, and more gradual early discipline-specific performance progress. These predictor effects are closely correlated with one another, suggesting a robust pattern.
OUTLOOK
The new evidence enhances our understanding of how world-class performance develops. The similar developmental pattern of world-class performers across different domains suggests widespread, if not universal, principles underlying the acquisition of exceptional human performance. Assumptions suggested by the evidence from young and sub-elite performers, along with other approaches discussed in the literature, cannot adequately explain the recent evidence. New explanations may further advance scientific understanding. As a starting point, we suggest three explanatory hypotheses: the search-and-match hypothesis, the enhanced-learning-capital hypothesis, and the limited-risks hypothesis. On the basis of the recent evidence, scientists can enhance theories, program managers can promote evidence-based practices, and policy-makers can better allocate funding. Such efforts may foster opportunities to enhance world-class performance across science, sports, music, and other fields.
The development of the highest levels of human achievement.
Across domains, world-class performers, compared with peers performing just below this level, engaged in more multidisciplinary practice and showed more gradual performance progress through their early years.
Abstract
Scientists have long debated the origins of exceptional human achievements. This literature review summarizes recent evidence from multiple domains on the acquisition of world-class performance. We review published papers and synthesize developmental patterns of international top scientists, musicians, athletes, and chess players. The available evidence is highly consistent across domains: (i) Young exceptional performers and later adult world-class performers are largely two discrete populations over time. (ii) Early (e.g., youth) exceptional performance is associated with extensive discipline-specific practice, little or no multidisciplinary practice, and fast early progress. (iii) By contrast, adult world-class performance is associated with limited discipline-specific practice, increased multidisciplinary practice, and gradual early progress. These discoveries advance understanding of the development of the highest echelons of human achievement.
Access the full article
View all access options to continue reading this article.
Supplementary Materials
This PDF file includes:
References and Notes
1
F. Galton, Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences (MacMillan, 1869).
2
A. De Candolle, History of the sciences and of savants after two centuries: Tracking other études on some scientific subjects, with particular reference to selection in the human species [in French: Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles: suivie d’autres études sur des sujets scientifiques en particulier sur la sélection dans l’espèce humaine] (H. Georg, Libraire-Éditeur, 1873).
3
K. A. Ericsson, R. T. Krampe, C. Tesch-Römer, The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol. Rev. 100, 363–406 (1993).
4
J. A. Sloboda, J. W. Davidson, M. J. A. Howe, D. G. Moore, The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. Br. J. Psychol. 87, 287–309 (1996).
5
N. Charness, M. Tuffiash, R. T. Krampe, E. Reingold, E. Vasyukova, The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 151–165 (2005).
6
B. N. Macnamara, D. Z. Hambrick, F. L. Oswald, Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Sci. 25, 1608–1618 (2014).
7
D. F. Feldon, K. Litson, B. Cahoon, Z. Feng, A. Walker, C. Tofel-Grehl, The predictive validity of the GRE across graduate outcomes: A meta-analysis of trends over time. J. Higher Educ. 95, 120–148 (2024).
8
J. Wai, D. Lubinski, C. P. Benbow, J. H. Steiger, Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. J. Educ. Psychol. 102, 860–871 (2010).
9
A. Oliveira, G. E. McPherson, L. M. Ribeiro, P. Oliveira-Silva, Can motivation and intentions of parental support predict musical achievement before the commencement of musical studies at the elementary school level? Int. J. Music Educ. 42, 17–31 (2024).
10
C. Perleth, K. A. Heller, “The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness” in Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent, R. F. Subotnik, K. D. Arnold, Eds. (Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1994), pp. 77–114.
11
A. B. H. de Bruin, N. Smits, R. M. J. P. Rikers, H. G. Schmidt, Deliberate practice predicts performance over time in adolescent chess players and drop-outs: A linear mixed models analysis. Br. J. Psychol. 99, 473–497 (2008).
12
A. C. Lehmann, Using admission assessments to predict final grades in a college music program. J. Res. Music Educ. 62, 245–258 (2014).
13
H. Chauncey, T. L. Hilton, Are aptitude tests valid for the highly able? Science 148, 1297–1304 (1965).
14
W. W. Willingham, Predicting success in graduate education: Improved selection procedures are likely to come from better definitions of “success”. Science 183, 273–278 (1974).
15
D. Lubinski, C. P. Benbow, Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 316–345 (2006).
16
N. R. Kuncel, S. A. Hezlett, Standardized tests predict graduate students’ success. Science 315, 1080–1081 (2007).
17
J. L. Holland, A. W. Astin, The prediction of the academic, artistic, scientific, and social achievement of undergraduates of superior scholastic aptitude. J. Educ. Psychol. 53, 132–143 (1962).
18
C. P. Benbow, O. Arjmand, Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. J. Educ. Psychol. 82, 430–441 (1990).
19
R. E. Klinedinst, Predicting performance achievement and retention of fifth-grade instrumental students. J. Res. Music Educ. 39, 225–238 (1991).
20
C. P. Benbow, Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? J. Educ. Psychol. 84, 51–61 (1992).
21
G. Hackett, N. E. Betz, J. M. Casas, I. A. Rocha-Singh, Gender, ethnicity, and social cognitive factors predicting the academic achievement of students in engineering. J. Couns. Psychol. 39, 527–538 (1992).
23
N. R. Kuncel, S. A. Hezlett, D. S. Ones, A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychol. Bull. 127, 162–181 (2001).
24
D. G. Moore, K. Burland, J. W. Davidson, The social context of musical success: A developmental account. Br. J. Psychol. 94, 529–549 (2003).
25
N. R. Kuncel, S. A. Hezlett, D. S. Ones, Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 148–161 (2004).
26
M. Bilalić, P. McLeod, F. Gobet, Does chess need intelligence? — A study with young chess players. Intelligence 35, 457–470 (2007).
27
I. J. Deary, S. Strand, P. Smith, C. Fernandes, Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence 35, 13–21 (2007).
28
R. H. Grabner, E. Stern, A. C. Neubauer, Individual differences in chess expertise: A psychometric investigation. Acta Psychol. 124, 398–420 (2007).
30
J. Ruthsatz, D. Detterman, W. S. Griscom, B. A. Cirullo, Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence 36, 330–338 (2008).
31
T. W. H. Ng, D. C. Feldman, How broadly does education contribute to job performance? Pers. Psychol. 62, 89–134 (2009).
32
N. Schmitt, J. Keeney, F. L. Oswald, T. J. Pleskac, A. Q. Billington, R. Sinha, M. Zorzie, Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students. J. Appl. Psychol. 94, 1479–1497 (2009).
33
R. Gaschler, J. Progscha, K. Smallbone, N. Ram, M. Bilalić, Playing off the curve - testing quantitative predictions of skill acquisition theories in development of chess performance. Front. Psychol. 5, e923 (2014).
34
B. Harder, W. Vialle, A. Ziegler, Conceptions of giftedness and expertise put to the empirical test. High Abil. Stud. 25, 83–120 (2014).
35
A. Wolf, R. Kopiez, Do grades reflect the development of excellence in music students? The prognostic validity of entrance exams at universities of music. Music. Sci. 18, 232–248 (2014).
36
R. Fernández-Alonso, J. Suárez-Álvarez, J. Muñiz, Adolescents’ homework performance in mathematics and science: Personal factors and teaching practices. J. Educ. Psychol. 107, 1075–1085 (2015).
37
J. Vulperhorst, C. Lutz, R. de Kleijn, J. van Tartwijk, Disentangling the predictive validity of high school grades for academic success in university. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 43, 399–414 (2018).
38
M. Bilalić, R. Đokić, M. Koso-Drljević, N. Đapo, T. Pollet, When (deliberate) practice is not enough – the role of intelligence, practice, and knowledge in academic performance. Curr. Psychol. 42, 23147–23165 (2023).
39
R. Burt‐Perkins, J. Mills, Pitching it right? Selection and learning at a music conservatoire. Br. Educ. Res. J. 35, 817–835 (2009).
40
F. Gobet, G. Campitelli, The role of domain-specific practice, handedness, and starting age in chess. Dev. Psychol. 43, 159–172 (2007).
41
J. B. Watson, Behaviorism (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1930).
42
K. A. Ericcson, W. G. Chase, S. Faloon, Acquisition of a memory skill. Science 208, 1181–1182 (1980).
43
K. A. Ericsson, M. J. Prietula, E. T. Cokely, The making of an expert. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85, 114–121, 193 (2007).
44
D. Y. Dai, The Nature and Nurture of Giftedness. A New Framework for Understanding Gifted Education (Teachers College Press, 2010).
45
R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius, F. C. Worrell, Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 12, 3–54 (2011).
46
D. Y. Dai, F. Chen, Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gift. Child Q. 57, 151–168 (2013).
47
J. S. Renzulli, “The three-ring conception of giftedness” in Reflections on Gifted Education, S. M. Reis, Ed. (Prufrock Press, 2016), pp. 55–86.
48
S. A. Barab, J. A. Plucker, Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educ. Psychol. 37, 165–182 (2002).
49
V. P. Glăveanu, Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17, 69–81 (2013).
50
F. Gagné, Differentiating Giftedness from Talent: The DMGT Perspective on Talent Development (Routledge, 2021).
51
S. P. Marland Jr., “Education of the gifted and talented - volume 1: report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education” (US Government Printing Office, 1972).
52
J. S. Renzulli, L. H. Smith, A. J. White, C. M. Callahan, R. K. Hartman, K. L. Westberg, M. K. Gavin, S. M. Reis, D. Siegle, R. E. Systma, Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students (Renzulli scales) (Prufrock Press, 2013).
54
D. D. Dixson, S. J. Peters, M. C. Makel, J. L. Jolly, M. S. Matthews, E. M. Miller, K. E. Rambo-Hernandez, A. N. Rinn, J. H. Robins, H. E. Wilson, A call to reframe gifted education as maximizing learning. Phi Delta Kappan 102, 22–25 (2020).
56
R. J. Sternberg, L. Jarvin, O. A. Desmet, Lessons from the conservatory model as a basis for undergraduate education and the development of intelligence. J. Intell. 10, 34 (2022).
57
A. Güllich, M. Barth, Effects of early talent promotion on junior and senior performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 54, 697–710 (2024).
58
J. Wai, Investigating America’s elite: Cognitive ability, education, and sex differences. Intelligence 41, 203–211 (2013).
59
A. Güllich, B. N. Macnamara, D. Z. Hambrick, What makes a champion? Early multidisciplinary practice, not early specialization, predicts world-class performance. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 6–29 (2022).
60
M. Barth, A. Güllich, B. N. Macnamara, D. Z. Hambrick, Predictors of junior versus senior elite performance are opposite: A systematic review and meta-analysis of participation patterns. Sports Med. 52, 1399–1416 (2022).
61
C.-J. Tsay, Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 14580–14585 (2013).
62
T. Clynes, How to raise a genius: Lessons from a 45-year study of super-smart children. Nature 537, 152–155 (2016).
63
B. N. Macnamara, R. W. Prather, A. P. Burgoyne, Beliefs about success are prone to cognitive fallacies. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 716–717 (2023).
64
G. Berthelot, A. Bar-Hen, A. Marck, V. Foulonneau, S. Douady, P. Noirez, P. B. Zablocki-Thomas, J. da Silva Antero, P. A. Carter, J.-M. Di Meglio, J.-F. Toussaint, An integrative modeling approach to the age-performance relationship in mammals at the cellular scale. Sci. Rep. 9, 418 (2019).
65
J. C. Kaufman, R. A. Beghetto, Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 13, 1–12 (2009).
66
A. Güllich, M. Barth, B. N. Macnamara, D. Z. Hambrick, Quantifying the extent to which successful juniors and successful seniors are two disparate populations: A systematic review and synthesis of findings. Sports Med. 53, 1201–1217 (2023).
68
Y. Gingras, M. L. Wallace, Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: A bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007). Scientometrics 82, 401–412 (2010).
71
A. Graf, The Scientific Elite of Germany: Social Profile and Development from 1945 to 2013 [in German: Die wissenschaftliche Elite Deutschlands: Sozialprofil und Werdegang zwischen 1945 und 2013] (Campus, 2015).
72
R. Root-Bernstein, L. Allen, L. Beach, R. Bhadula, J. Fast, C. Hosey, B. Kremkow, J. Lapp, K. Lonc, K. Pawelec, A. Podufaly, C. Russ, L. Tennant, E. Vrtis, S. Weinlander, Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi Members. J. Psychol. Sci. Technol. 1, 51–63 (2008).
73
D. Lubinski, Exceptional cognitive ability: The phenotype. Behav. Genet. 39, 350–358 (2009).
74
A. Sullivan, S. Parsons, F. Green, R. D. Wiggins, G. Ploubidis, Elite universities, fields of study and top salaries: Which degree will make you rich? Br. Educ. Res. J. 44, 663–680 (2018).
75
R. Weinstein, The great recession and the widening income gap between alumni of elite and less selective universities. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 17, 216–241 (2025).
76
D. K. Simonton, Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Dev. Rev. 20, 283–318 (2000).
77
L. M. Terman, Psychological approaches to the biography of genius. Science 92, 293–301 (1940).
78
A. Roe, The Making of a Scientist (Dodd, Mead & Co., 1953).
79
L. M. Terman, M. H. Oden, The Gifted Group at Mid-life: Thirty-five Years’ Follow-up of the Superior Child (Stanford Univ. Press, 1959).
80
L. A. Sosniak, “Learning to be a concert pianist” in Developing Talent in Young People, B. Bloom, Ed. (Ballantine Books, 1985), pp. 19–67.
81
D. K. Simonton, “Early and late bloomers among 120 classical composers: Were the greatest geniuses also prodigies?” in Musical Prodigies: Interpretations from Psychology, Education, Musicology and Ethnomusicology, G. E. McPherson, Ed. (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016), pp. 185–197.
82
D. H. Moore II, A study of age group track and field records to relate age and running speed. Nature 253, 264–265 (1975).
83
S. V. Allen, W. G. Hopkins, Age of peak competitive performance of elite athletes: A systematic review. Sports Med. 45, 1431–1441 (2015).
84
M. Hassler, The critical teens – musical capacities change in adolescence. Eur. J. High Ability 3, 89–98 (1992).
85
M. Csikszentmihalyi, K. Rathunde, S. Whalen, Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).
86
J. Y. Jung, Unfulfilled potential: The adult careers of former musical prodigies Ervin Nyiregyhazi, Fanny Mendelssohn Hensel, and David Helfgott. Australas. J. Gift. Educ. 24, 6–12 (2015).
87
R. W. Howard, A complete database of international chess players and chess performance ratings for varied longitudinal studies. Behav. Res. Methods 38, 698–703 (2006).
88
S. Chowdhary, I. Iacopini, F. Battiston, Quantifying human performance in chess. Sci. Rep. 13, 2113 (2023).
89
R. Root-Bernstein, M. Root-Bernstein, A statistical study of intra-domain and trans-domain polymathy among Nobel laureates. Creat. Res. J. 32, 93–112 (2020).
90
L. Liu, N. Dehmamy, J. Chown, C. L. Giles, D. Wang, Understanding the onset of hot streaks across artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. Nat. Commun. 12, 5392 (2021).
91
J. Li, Y. Yin, S. Fortunato, D. Wang, Scientific elite revisited: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact. J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20200135 (2020).
92
H. F. Chan, F. G. Mixon Jr., B. Torgler, Relation of early career performance and recognition to the probability of winning the Nobel Prize in economics. Scientometrics 114, 1069–1086 (2018).
93
L. Bruce, D. Farrow, A. Raynor, Performance milestones in the development of expertise: Are they critical? J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 25, 281–297 (2013).
94
R. W. Howard, Linking extreme precocity and adult eminence: A study of eight prodigies at international chess. High Abil. Stud. 19, 117–130 (2008).
95
G. J. Feist, The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse finalists and members of the national academy of sciences. J. Adult Dev. 13, 23–35 (2006).
96
L. J. Duffy, B. Baluch, K. A. Ericsson, Dart performance as a function of facets of practice amongst professional and amateur men and women players. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 35, 232–245 (2004).
97
J. Baker, J. Cote, B. Abernethy, Sport-specific practice and the development of expert decision-making in team ball sports. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 15, 12–25 (2003).
98
I. Lakatos, “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1970), pp. 91–196.
99
K. R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson, 1959).
100
D. Neal, The complexity of job mobility among young men. J. Labor Econ. 17, 237–261 (1999).
101
J. J. McCall, Economics of information and job search. Q. J. Econ. 84, 113 (1970).
102
J. D. Bransford, D. L. Schwartz, Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Rev. Res. Educ. 24, 61–100 (1999).
103
R. Root-Bernstein, M. van Dyke, A. Peruski, M. Root-Bernstein, Correlation between tools for thinking; arts, crafts, and design avocations; and scientific achievement among STEMM professionals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 1910–1917 (2019).
104
B. Uzzi, S. Mukherjee, M. Stringer, B. Jones, Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342, 468–472 (2013).
105
D. K. Simonton, Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. Am. Psychol. 55, 151–158 (2000).
106
D. Araújo, K. Davids, R. Hristovski, The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 7, 653–676 (2006).
107
C. Rodríguez-Gude, Y. Taboada-Iglesias, M. Pino-Juste, Musculoskeletal pain in musicians: Prevalence and risk factors - a systematic review. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 29, 883–901 (2023).
108
N. E. Giusti, S. L. Carder, L. Vopat, J. Baker, A. Tarakemeh, B. Vopat, M. K. Mulcahey, Comparing burnout in sport-specializing versus sport-sampling adolescent athletes: A sytematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 8, 2325967120907579 (2020).
109
D. R. Bell, E. G. Post, K. Biese, C. Bay, T. Valovich McLeod, Sport specialization and risk of overuse injuries: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Pediatrics 142, e20180657 (2018).
110
C. Maslach, W. B. Schaufeli, M. P. Leiter, Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 397–422 (2001).
111
W. P. Morgan, D. R. Brown, J. S. Raglin, P. J. O’Connor, K. A. Ellickson, Psychological monitoring of overtraining and staleness. Br. J. Sports Med. 21, 107–114 (1987).
112
M. Barth, A. Güllich, Non-linear association of efficiency of practice of adult elite athletes with their youth multi-sport practice. J. Sports Sci. 39, 915–925 (2021).
113
M. Barth, A. Güllich, C. Raschner, E. Emrich, The path to international medals: A supervised machine learning approach to explore the impact of coach-led sport-specific and non-specific practice. PLOS ONE 15, e0239378 (2020).
114
M. Root-Bernstein, R. Root-Bernstein, Polymathy among Nobel laureates as a creative strategy—The qualitative and phenomenological evidence. Creat. Res. J. 35, 116–142 (2023).
116
R. J. Murnane, J. B. Willett, Y. Duhaldeborde, J. H. Tyler, How important are the cognitive skills of teenagers in predicting subsequent earnings? J. Policy Anal. Manage. 19, 547–568 (2000).
117
N. Becker, S. Höft, M. Holzenkamp, F. M. Spinath, The predictive validity of assessment centers in German-speaking regions. J. Pers. Psychol. 10, 61–69 (2011).
118
R. W. Howard, Longitudinal effects of different types of practice on the development of chess expertise. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 26, 359–369 (2012).
119
B. Bloom, Ed., Developing Talent in Young People (Ballantine Books, 1985).
120
M. Barth, A. Güllich, B. N. Macnamara, D. Z. Hambrick, Quantifying the extent to which junior performance predicts senior performance in Olympic sports: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 54, 95–104 (2024).
121
E. Dahlin, A. S. Neely, A. Larsson, L. Bäckman, L. Nyberg, Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science 320, 1510–1512 (2008).
122
G. E. McPherson, J. W. Davidson, R. Faulkner, Music in Our Lives: Rethinking Musical Ability, Development, and Identity (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
123
L. Oppici, D. Panchuk, Specific and general transfer of perceptual-motor skills and learning between sports: A systematic review. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 59, e102118 (2022).
124
C. C. von Bastian, S. Belleville, R. C. Udale, A. Reinhartz, M. Essounni, T. Strobach, Mechanisms underlying training-induced cognitive change. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 30–41 (2022).
125
D. Lubinski, C. P. Benbow, D. L. Shea, H. Eftekhari-Sanjani, M. B. J. Halvorson, Men and women at promise for scientific excellence: Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychol. Sci. 12, 309–317 (2001).
126
T. Heinze, P. Shapira, J. D. Rogers, J. M. Senker, Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Res. Policy 38, 610–623 (2009).
127
H. F. Chan, B. Torgler, The implications of educational and methodological background for the career success of Nobel laureates: An investigation of major awards. Scientometrics 102, 847–863 (2015).
128
L. Bian, S.-J. Leslie, A. Cimpian, Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science 355, 389–391 (2017).
129
D. C. Sergeant, E. Himonides, Orchestrated sex: The representation of male and female musicians in world-class symphony orchestras. Front. Psychol. 10, 1760 (2019).
130
T. Baier, V. Lang, M. Grätz, K. J. Barclay, D. C. Conley, C. T. Dawes, T. Laidley, T. H. Lyngstad, Genetic influences on educational achievement in cross-national perspective. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 38, 959–974 (2022).
131
M. Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity (Harper Collins, 1996).
132
V. J. Cassandro, D. K. Simonton, Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. J. Creat. Behav. 44, 9–26 (2010).
133
R. K. White, The versatility of genius. J. Soc. Psychol. 2, 460–489 (1931).
134
K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. Am. Psychol. 49, 725–747 (1994).
135
J. Baer, The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Rev. 37, 165–178 (2015).
136
A. M. Abdulla Alabbasi, M. A. Runco, A. E. Ayoub, Creative activity and accomplishment as indicators of polymathy among gifted and nongifted students. Front. Psychol. 14, 1255508 (2024).
137
A. L. Duckworth, Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance (Simon & Schuster, 2016).
138
A. L. Duckworth, C. Peterson, M. D. Matthews, D. R. Kelly, Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 1087–1101 (2007).
139
P. M. Fitts, M. I. Posner, Human Performance (Brooks/Cole, 1967).
140
A. Newell, P. S. Rosenbloom, “Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice” in Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, J. R. Anderson, Ed. (Erlbaum, 1981), pp. 1–55.
141
J. Bamberger, “Growing up prodigies: The midlife crisis” in New Directions for Child Development: Developmental Approaches to Giftedness and Creativity, D. H. Feldmann, Ed. (Jossey-Bass, 1982), pp. 61–77.
142
E. Winner, The origins and ends of giftedness. Am. Psychol. 55, 159–169 (2000).
143
D. Deichmann, M. Baer, A recipe for success? Sustaining creativity among first-time creative producers. J. Appl. Psychol. 108, 100–113 (2023).