Abstract
Nature has long inspired engineering innovations. Recent advances in biohybrid research have taken this inspiration further by directly integrating biotic materials into engineered systems. Here we report “3D necroprinting,” a biohybrid manufacturing technique that repurposes female mosquito proboscides as high-resolution 3D printing nozzles. The mosquito proboscis, with its unique geometry, structure, and mechanics, enables printed line widths as fine as 20 μm, surpassing commercially available 36-gauge dispense tips by ~100%. The mosquito proboscis dispense tip can withstand internal pressures of approximately 60 kPa, enabling effective fluid extrusion. Demonstrated applications include high-resolution printing of complex structures such as a honeycomb structure, a maple leaf, and bioscaffolds encapsulating cancer cells and red blood cells, showcasing the versatility and capacity of 3D necroprinting. By introducing biotic materials as viable substitutes to complex engineered components, this work paves the way for sustainable and innovative solutions in advanced manufacturing and microengineering.
INTRODUCTION
Nature is an unparalleled source of inspiration for engineering, from early human tools fashioned from stones to modern bioinspired technologies (1). Biomimetic approaches have led to transformative technologies such as self-cleaning surfaces inspired by lotus leaves (2), eddy flaps modeled after bird feathers (3), and Velcro’s hook-and-loop system derived from burdock burrs (4). Beyond imitation, humans also directly harness natural materials, from animal furs and leathers used in textiles (5), to wood in building and toolmaking (6). These technologies, involving nonliving biological materials (biotic materials), have influenced human history and technological development.
Recent advances in biohybrid engineering have pushed this paradigm further, seamlessly integrating biotic materials into engineered systems. Innovations in this field include soft biohybrid robotic systems, capable of sensing, healing, and adapting autonomously (7–9). For instance, researchers have used biological tissues such as rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (10), mud eel corpses (11), Madagascar hissing cockroaches (12), and beetle legs (13) to create biohybrid devices. A notable example is biohybrid pneumatic microgrippers called necrobotics, composed of the legs of deceased spiders (14). This spider-based microgripper functions by pneumatically controlling the spider’s leg joints, enabling the legs to expand when activated and contract to their natural state when deactivated. Necrobots offer a low-cost, efficient, and biodegradable alternative to conventional microgrippers, addressing the complexity and environmental concerns of traditional manufacturing methods.
The progress of biohybrid engineering opens opportunities to extend biomimicry to new engineering domains, where biohybrid strategies could tackle challenges posed by expensive and nonbiodegradable conventional systems. While most existing biohybrid systems have focused on robotics and sensing, leveraging biotic materials for advanced manufacturing remains largely unexplored. Among these opportunities, dispense tips stand out as a promising focus area. They are critical in diverse applications, ranging from precise sample handling in laboratories and clinics (15, 16), to fluid dispensing in bioprinting and manufacturing (17, 18). Currently, conventional dispense tips are mainly made of nonbiodegradable materials, such as metals and plastics, contributing to substantial environmental burdens (19). In the United States alone, over 4 billion dispense tips are used annually (see the Supplementary Materials for detailed breakdown), with global usage certainly much higher. Beyond environmental concerns, cost is another challenge, particularly for high-resolution dispense tips (i.e., micro dispense tips; diameter, <100 μm). Micro dispense tips are essential for applications, including but not limited to microelectronic fabrication (20), pharmaceutical injection (19, 21), 3D bioprinting (22), and direct ink writing (DIW) (18). The finest commercially available metal dispense tips, such as 36-gauge (G) dispense tips (approximately 35 μm inner diameter), are priced at over $80 USD per tip (NanoFil Needles, World Precision Instruments), while plastic tips are limited to 30G (approximately 150 μm inner diameter).
In contrast, nature offers a diverse array of micro dispense tips with intricate structures and excellent performance, such as insect proboscides and plant xylem vessels (23, 24). For instance, female mosquito proboscides are stiff, nearly straight, and equipped with vibration-assisted mechanisms, enabling them to pierce through surfaces with minimal force and access blood vessels with precision. The unique combination of mechanical, geometrical, and structural properties makes the female mosquito proboscis appealing for dispensing applications. This study explores the feasibility of using female mosquito proboscides as bio-nozzles for high-resolution DIW 3D printing. By investigating the mechanical properties, geometry, and operational behavior of the female mosquito proboscis, we will establish their viability as sustainable alternatives to conventional micro dispense tips. Repurposing dispensing structures from uninfected, laboratory grown, deceased organisms represents a new avenue for engineering applications, which not only reduces the cost of high-resolution dispense tip production but also minimizes environmental impact by integrating biodegradable and eco-friendly biological materials.
Here, we demonstrate the feasibility and performance of the female mosquito proboscis as an extrusion nozzle in a custom-built, high-resolution DIW 3D printer. We begin with a survey of biological micro dispense tips found in nature, categorizing them based on their structure and functionality to identify candidates suitable for high-resolution printing applications. The comparative analysis leads to the female mosquito proboscis, with its unique combination of mechanical and structural properties and accessibility, as a model system. We detail the design and integration of the female mosquito proboscis as a bio-nozzle, focusing on the development of a robust attachment method and the characterization of its mechanical behavior during function. Our experiments identify two primary failure modes: clog-induced overpressure at the tip and uniform overpressure due to high viscosity–induced flow requirements, which are further examined through theoretical analysis to reveal the respective underlying mechanisms. We define an operational process window from a parametric study of extrusion and motion speeds, to enable stable and efficient printing performance. Furthermore, we present a series of demonstrations of the biohybrid DIW system in fabricating high-resolution structures, including standard geometries and biologically relevant designs. Last, the broader implications of this methodology are discussed, emphasizing its potential to reduce manufacturing costs, advance the field of biohybrid engineering, and open unique pathways for the application of biologically derived materials in advanced manufacturing.
RESULTS
Selection of biological micro dispense tip
To explore the potential of biological micro dispense tips for high-resolution dispensing applications, we began with a comprehensive survey of biological micro dispense tips found in nature. Figure 1A provides an overview of various dispense tip-like structures in nature that facilitate fluid delivery. These structures exhibit diverse morphologies and functionalities, making them intriguing templates for engineered dispensing tools. By examining specific characteristics such as curvature, length, diameter, stiffness, and strength, one can identify promising candidates for specific applications, such as drug delivery (25), biomedical analysis through body fluid collection, adhesive dispensing in automated manufacturing, 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering (26, 27), and biohybrid atomic force microscopy (28).

Fig. 1. Selection process for a biological DIW nozzle.
(A) Selection chart summarizing available biological micro dispense tips in nature by category. Stingers: example provided is a scorpion (Shutterstock.com/Mauro Rodrigues). Fangs: example provided is a snake (fang color modified to accentuate appearance) (iStock.com/liveslow). Harpoons: example provided is a cone snail (photo credit: David Paul, AAP). Claws: example provided is a centipede (iStock.com/Apisit Wilaijit). Flexed under head; example provided is an assassin bug (iStock.com/yod67). Retracted into head; example provided is an Australian bee fly (Fred Hort, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en). Flexed in front of head; example provided is a mosquito (iStock.com/Vladimir Davydov). Coiled: example provided is a butterfly (iStock.com/Adisak Mitrprayoon). Plant xylem vessel: example provided shows an SEM image (sciencephoto.com/Steve Gschmeissner) highlighting the multiple channels in a common plant root (iStock.com/Chepko). All photos are reprinted from external sources and cited in table S4. (B) Ashby plot illustrating the curvature and inner diameter of several biological micro dispense tip categories. The mosquito species used in this study (i.e., A. Aegypti) is explicitly highlighted in red. (C) Parameter analysis wheel highlighting the parameters of interest for a DIW printer nozzle and an investigation of these parameters for a female mosquito proboscis determining its feasibility as a printer nozzle. Stiffness value, labrum inner diameter, and proboscis length data were supplied from (44).
Biological micro dispense tips can be broadly classified into two main categories: fluid depositing and fluid withdrawing dispense tips. Fluid depositing dispense tips eject substances from the organism into the environment. Typically, they are used to inject toxins into prey to induce paralysis or digestion (29–31), aiding in feeding, self-defense (31), or territorial competition. Examples include stingers, as seen in bees, wasps, and scorpions (32, 33); fangs, common in venomous snakes (34); claws, such as centipede forcipules with varying poison duct structures (29, 35); and harpoons, such as those of cone snails, which use tethered, hollow harpoons to deliver paralyzing agents (36, 37). In comparison, fluid withdrawing micro dispense tips serve to absorb fluids from the environment, transporting them into the organism. This category includes plant xylem vessels, which transport water from roots to leaves (38), as well as insect proboscides that are elongated stylets for feeding. Proboscides vary in composition, structure, and mechanics, adapting to their target food sources. They can be categorized into four types: flexed under the head, retracted into the head, flexed in front of the head, and coiled (39). For instance, assassin bugs and long-tongued bees have proboscides flexed under the head, while butterflies and moths possess coiled proboscides optimized to reach deep within flowers (23, 39, 40).
A systematic analysis of biological micro dispense tips was conducted to identify the most suitable candidates for DIW 3D printing. Ideal dispense tips should exhibit minimal curvature, be composed of materials with relatively high stiffness and strength, ensuring minimal compliance during ink extrusion, criteria consistent with prior studies on DIW printability (41–43). Beyond these requirements, two additional parameters are critical: inner diameter and dispense tip length. Inner diameter is important for achieving high printing resolution, while the dispense tip length influences the feasibility of fabrication. Micro dispense tips must be sufficiently visible and manipulable for integration into the printing system; however, exceedingly long dispense tips can generate high backpressure, increasing the risk of mechanical failure.
Referring to the selection chart (Fig. 1A) and length/curvature plot (Fig. 1B), several biological micro dispense tips were identified as potential candidates for meeting our selection criteria, including the proboscides of mosquitos, assassin bugs, bed bugs, aphids, sandflies, and tsetse flies. Among them, the female mosquito proboscis is particularly noteworthy for its stiff and straight structure, capable of even piercing the epidermis and infiltrating blood vessels, despite of being composed of soft polymeric materials (44–47). Anatomically, it features a core-shell structure, with the labium forming the shell and a fascicle composed of stylets (e.g., labrum and hypopharynx) serving as the core (28). The labrum and the hypopharynx together form a single, sealed, hollow-tube structure that transports blood from the host to the female mosquito (44). This structural design makes the female mosquito fascicle a compelling candidate as a biological micro dispense tip.
We further examine the characteristics of the female mosquito proboscis against the established criteria of the DIW nozzles (Fig. 1C). The straight shape of proboscis gives nearly zero curvature and its inner diameter, averaging 20 to 25 μm (44), is smaller than the minimum diameter of commercially available metal and plastic dispense tips. While glass-pulled dispense tips can achieve diameters below 1 μm (48), they are difficult to fabricate (49, 50) and extremely brittle (51). The female mosquito proboscis length is approximately 2 mm (44), which is manageable for manipulation and can be adjusted during fabrication to tune backpressure. Mechanically, the stiffness of the female mosquito proboscis is approximately 200 MPa (44), comparable to common plastics (52–54). While its mechanical strength is not documented in the literature, we measured it through burst pressure tests, to be approximately 708 kPa (detailed below). Furthermore, mosquitoes are widely available, easy to rear, and present on a global scale, enhancing their accessibility for this application.
Given these attributes, we selected the female mosquito proboscis as a primary candidate for biohybrid DIW printing. We hypothesized that integrating female mosquito proboscides with a 3D printing platform could enable high-resolution 3D necroprinting. The structure and size of the female mosquito proboscis facilitate easy mounting onto a printer platform, while its mechanical properties provide resistance against rupture during the extrusion of DIW inks. The extensive evolutionary refinement of the female mosquito proboscis yields an optimized internal surface architecture designed for the efficient transport of non-Newtonian fluids under laminar flow conditions (fig. S18 and see the Supplementary Materials). To test this hypothesis, we will materialize the concept of 3D necroprinting and systematically investigated its operational parameters and performance below.
Design of 3D necroprinting
To harness biological micro dispense tips for 3D printing, we developed a custom 3D DIW printer. This setup included a high-resolution motion stage, allowing for the attachment of biological micro dispense tips, as well as a piston-driven extruder (fig. S1) capable of micrometer-level dispensing resolution, synchronized with the motion stage using an Arduino microcontroller and a DC signal switch (fig. S4). A power law model was used during the preliminary design phase to create a theoretical process window (fig. S2), providing insight into the feasibility of various extruder stepper motor options during the selection process. The validity of the simplified theoretical process window was authenticated via COMSOL simulations using a Herschel-Bulkley inelastic flow model (fig. S3). Figure 2A illustrates the overall setup, including the extruder and syringe assembly. Additional details on the design and implementation of the printer are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Fig. 2. Concept and configuration of 3D necroprinting.
(A) Schematic illustrating the custom-designed DIW 3D printer, featuring a piston-driven extruder. (B) Schematic illustrating the concept of an engineered biological micro dispense tip designed for high-resolution printing applications. (C) Experimental setup showing the female mosquito proboscis mounted on a custom 3D DIW printer, achieved by attaching the proboscis to a standard 30G dispense tip using resin support. Scale bar, 50 μm. The inset mosquito image is reprinted from the public domain (photo credit: CDC/James D. Gathany) and cited in table S4. (D) Snapshot sequence demonstrating the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip extruding Cellink Start gel, a 3D-printable bioink. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Figure 2B illustrates the working principle to use biological micro dispense tips in DIW printing applications. The integration of the female mosquito proboscis with the custom printer leverages the Luer-Lock mechanism, which connects the printer-mounted syringe to disposable engineered dispense tips. This approach involves bonding the biological micro dispense tip directly to the outlet of the engineered dispense tip, enabling a continuous fluid pathway from the syringe barrel, through the dispense tip conduit, and ultimately through the biological micro dispense tip to deposit ink onto the substrate. While engineered dispense tips are currently used to facilitate this process, customized reusable adapters could be developed to interface directly with syringes and biological micro dispense tips, eliminating the reliance on engineered tips. Figure 2C demonstrates the DIW biological micro dispense tip setup, showing the female mosquito proboscis mounted on the printer. A zoomed-in view highlights the presence of the female mosquito proboscis extending from the Luer-Lock dispense tip. To demonstrate the feasibility of extruding a 3D-printable ink, Fig. 2D presents a sequence of snapshots showcasing the successful extrusion of Cellink Start, an off-the-shelf bioink optimized for cell-supporting structural 3D printing (movie S1).
Characterization and analysis of mechanical failure
It is important to characterize the mechanical failure behavior of the female mosquito proboscis during function and its dependence on the operating conditions of 3D printing. We first tested the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip by extruding various bioinks, including Cellink Start bioink gel and Pluronic F-127 bioink gel, which are commonly used for bioprinting. When ramping up the pressure to extrude Cellink Start bioink gel mid-air, we discovered an occasional behavior where fracture occurred at the outlet and an axial crack merged and propagated rapidly in the direction of the inlet (Fig. 3A, fig. S7, and movie S2). When extruding Pluronic F-127 bioink gel at a high extrusion rate, this would result in the proboscis experiencing a burst-like phenomenon near its inlet (Fig. 3B and movie S3). Notably, similar to the rupture at the outlet, it was an axial crack that propagated along the axis of the proboscis.

Fig. 3. Mechanical failure of female mosquito proboscis dispense tip.
(A) Snapshots illustrating fracture propagation along the sidewall of the mosquito proboscis during the extrusion of Cellink Start bioink, caused by clog-induced overpressure at the tip. Ink color is accentuated to highlight the fracture phenomenon. Scale bars, 50 μm. (B) Snapshots showing fracture propagation during the extrusion of Pluronic F-127 bioink, caused by uniform overpressure due to high viscosity–induced flow requirements. Ink color is accentuated to highlight the fracture phenomenon. Scale bars, 50 μm. (C) Schematic of the burst pressure test used to quantify the pressure at which the proboscis ruptures. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Mosquito proboscis internal pressure as a function of time for a single test iteration. (E) Recorded burst pressures inducing material failure. (F) Thin-walled pressure vessel model used to analyze the material strength. The schematic includes a front view and cross-sectional view of the complex female mosquito proboscis structure (left) and its simplified representation under the thin-wall approximation (right). is the critical hoop stress at which the material fails. (G) Schematic illustrating type 1 failure (clog-induced overpressure at the tip) of the mosquito proboscis during extrusion, highlighting the pressure buildup at the proboscis outlet as the ink gels in the absence of applied shear-stress. The pressure at the outlet is qualitatively represented as nearly equaling the pressure at the proboscis inlet. Region of highest pressure is indicated in vibrant red (i.e., at P1). (H) Schematic describing type 2 failure (uniform overpressure due to high viscosity–induced flow requirements) of the mosquito proboscis during extrusion, highlighting the excessive pressure at the proboscis inlet, with high-pressure zones in red and low-pressure zones in blue. (I) Operational guideline generated from the failure analysis, highlighting the maximum ink extrusion speed achievable as a function of the viscosity parameters.
To further investigate the initiation and propagation of axial cracking observed in the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip, we combined experimentation and analysis to study the rupture behavior. The mechanical failure behavior of the female mosquito proboscis has not been studied before. We built and implemented a customized setup for the burst pressure measurements. Figure 3C presents a schematic of the test apparatus, where a syringe, pressure transducer, standard dispense tip, and female mosquito proboscis are assembled and filled with deionized water. Once all air bubbles are expelled from within the system, the tip of the proboscis is sealed shut, converting the setup into a sealed pressure vessel. By displacing the plunger at a slow rate, we created a quasistatic pressure within the system, maintaining a constant pressure at any given period all throughout. The plunger was continuously loaded until the female mosquito proboscis failed, as manifested by a breach in the walls of the proboscis where the water escaped (movie S4). The pressure transducer recorded a pressure increase until a peak was attained at the moment of failure (Fig. 3D and fig. S8 for the raw data of all tested samples). Multiple burst pressure tests yielded an average burst pressure of 59.7 kPa (Fig. 3E).
To rationalize our results, we next performed an analysis to reveal the critical stress state within the female mosquito proboscis during rupture. Consider the structure of the female mosquito proboscis; the labrum is rolled up into a cylindrical tube with the two edges forming a seam covered by hypopharynx (Fig. 3F). Our imaging of its microstructure confirmed that the inner diameter is more than 10 times of the wall thickness (fig. S5). Therefore, as an idealization, we safely treated it as a uniform thin-walled tube, and so applied a thin-walled pressure vessel model. The following assumptions were also made: The proboscis is composed of an isotropic material, and the strains resulting from the applied internal pressure are small (55).
A uniform thin-walled cylindrical pressure vessel has two competing stress components: longitudinal stress zz and hoop/circumferential stress θθ. Each component can be directly computed from the vessel’s internal pressure as follows
where P is the internal pressure experienced by the vessel, d is the internal diameter, and t is the wall thickness. Applying this model to the female mosquito proboscis, and assuming a constant internal diameter and wall thickness of 23.6 and 0.96 μm, respectively, we calculated zz and θθ at the moment of failure to be 354 and 708 kPa, respectively (see the Supplementary Materials for details). As the hoop stress dominates both stresses present in the female mosquito proboscis walls at the instance of rupture and the axial crack is perpendicular to the hoop stress direction, these results suggest that the mechanical failure of the female mosquito proboscis is likely governed by the principal stress in the circumferential direction. To our knowledge, this is the first report to quantify the female mosquito proboscis’s strength at approximately 708 kPa, well below the reported material strengths of common metals and plastics used in engineered dispense tips.
After revealing the axial crack during rupture, we next investigated the location of rupture and its relation to operating conditions. As described above, we found that the rupture would either occasionally occur at the outlet of the female mosquito proboscis (type 1 failure) or consistently near its inlet (type 2 failure). For type 1 failure, a shear-thinning ink is extruded by the biological micro dispense tip and left to accumulate at the outlet. As such, the shear stress is removed from the shear-thinning ink, so that the storage modulus in turn dominates the loss modulus (G″ < G′), inducing a solid-phase behavior of the ink. As the ink exits the outlet of the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip, it no longer experiences the shear-stress caused by the extruder backpressure, enabling the solid-phase property of the fluid to prevail (fig. S11). The accumulation of this solid-like ink forms a blockage at the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip outlet, impeding the flow in this location. On the basis of the Herschel-Bulkley principle (see the Supplementary Materials), due to the blockage-induced ink velocity decrease at the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip outlet, an elevation in internal pressure at the nozzle outlet is attained (Fig. 3G). As the pressure rises, a substantial hoop stress develops in the female mosquito proboscis inner walls, particularly causing localized stress developments near structural imperfections or geometric discontinuities, leading to the initiation of microfractures. These microfractures propagate under continuous stress loading and ultimately coalesce, resulting in the observation of type 1 failure. Given this, type 1 failure is driven by clog-induced overpressure at the proboscis tip.
When the apparent viscosity of a shear-thinning ink is too high, forcing the backpressure requirements to exceed the material strength of the female mosquito proboscis, the rupture occurs in the upper section of the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip close to its inlet (Fig. 3H). Since its occurrence is driven by the pressure demands imposed by the desired fluid flow rate, we termed the type 2 failure as uniform overpressure due to high viscosity–induced flow requirements. It can be understood as follows: When the apparent viscosity of an ink is high, the backpressure necessary to maintain a certain ink velocity increases, with the backpressure experiencing a steady drop from the inlet to the outlet as the ink flows. Consequently, if the backpressure is set too high, as the pressure reaches the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip inlet walls, it will instantly stimulate , causing the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip to consistently rupture near the inlet.
Assuming the presence of microfractures along the female mosquito proboscis, and that these fractures govern failure behavior by dominating the intrinsic material strength of the biological matter, a fracture mechanics framework provides a more accurate method for quantifying material failure. To examine this fracture-driven behavior, a theoretical analysis was performed using a range of initial crack lengths to estimate the corresponding critical stress intensity factors (fig. S10). The results indicate that for specific crack lengths (2a = 8 and 12 μm), the calculated critical stress intensity factors (KIC = 4.35 and 7.04 kPa m1/2) closely approximate the reported value for chitin hydrogels (KIC ~10 kPa m1/2) (56). This alignment supports the anatomical composition of the female mosquito proboscis, wherein the labrum and hypopharynx consist of chitinized biological material and are connected by a less-chitinized membrane (57, 58).
To further generate the quantitative guideline for operating the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip for printing non-Newtonian inks, we adopted the Herschel-Bulkley model (59) to correlate the ink velocity (operating condition) to the intrinsic properties of the ink and female mosquito proboscis. Apparent viscosity is formulated using the power law (60) in the form of , where k is consistency coefficient, is the shear rate, and n the flow behavior index (0 < n < 1 for a non-Newtonian ink). The Herschel-Bulkley model indicates an inversely proportional relationship if backpressure is kept constant, as shown below
(3)
where ΔP is the change in pressure between the inlet and outlet of the proboscis, ΔL is the length, R is the inner radius, is the yield stress required to initiate flow, and k and n are fitting parameters that represent the apparent viscosity of the material. Thus, for any given value of n for a shear-thinning ink, as the magnitude of k increases (corresponding to an increase in apparent viscosity), the ink velocity must decrease given the maximum backpressure is limited by the female mosquito proboscis strength. Furthermore, we focused on a common bioink used for bioprinting application, 40% (w/v) Pluronic F-127 (consistency coefficient of 375 Pa∙sn, flow behavior index of 0.05, and yield stress of 310 Pa), and plotted Fig. 3I using the Herschel-Bulkley model (see the Supplementary Materials for details). Figure 3I plots the maximum allowable ink velocity as a function of printing ink rheology parameters (consistency coefficient k and flow behavior index n), hence providing the operator with the appropriate knowledge to avoid catastrophic rupture during print execution. For instance, according to the operational guideline above, for 40% (w/v) Pluronic F-127, the maximum allowable ink velocity is approximately 0.015 mm/s (i.e., 15 μm/s). Selecting an appropriate ink for printing is as crucial as tuning the operational printing parameters to mitigate the occurrence of nozzle failure during application; rheological properties and nanoparticle dimensions play a crucial role in determining the feasibility of extruding a given material. A screening process detailing the method for verifying extrusion feasibility of a new ink with the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip has been provided in the Supplementary Materials. The influence of a material’s surface tension property on generating continuous filaments is also of crucial importance in determining if an ink is appropriate for 3D DIW printing; the surface tension, along with operational parameters, must yield an Ohnesorge number greater than 10. See the Supplementary Materials for more information.
Process window and performance of 3D Necroprinting
Beyond regulating flow and pressure to prevent fracture of the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip, it is crucial to balance the ink extrusion speed (vink) and nozzle movement speed (vnozzle), or the draw ratio. An imbalance between these two critical parameters can result in overextrusion or underextrusion. To address this, parametric studies were conducted using a common shear-thinning ink [40% (w/v) Pluronic F-127], varying each speed independently within the instrument’s operational limits to define an optimal process window for synchronized printing (Fig. 4A, table S2, and fig. S12). Overextrusion is characterized by nonuniform, yet continuous, printed lines, typically accompanied by type 1 failure of the mosquito proboscis (as defined above). This failure mechanism is explained by the Bernoulli principle, wherein ink accumulates between the nozzle and the substrate, causing a decrease in extrusion speed at the outlet relative to the inlet velocity. This imbalance generates a pressure buildup at the nozzle outlet, ultimately leading to either gushing of ink or catastrophic rupture of the mosquito proboscis. As a general rule of thumb, the draw ratio (r = vink/vnozzle) should be kept below 1 to alleviate the issue of pressure build up at the outlet to prevent gushing or fracture.

Fig. 4. Process window and printed microstructures of 3D necroprinting.
(A) Plot depicting the expected extrusion behavior of the Pluronic F-127 bioink at various combinations of ink extrusion speed and nozzle movement speed. Snapshot optical images on the right provide a visual description of all three print regimes (good extrusion, underextrusion, and overextrusion) and their impact on the physical status of the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip. Scale bars, 100 μm. The overextrusion regime is defined by r = vink/vnozzle > 1. The good extrusion regime is defined by 0.25 < r ≤ 1. The underextrusion regime is defined by r ≤ 0.25. (B) 3D honeycomb structure printed using the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip and Pluronic F-127. Scale bars from left to right, 100, 200, 200, and 200 μm; top, 100 μm; and bottom, 20 μm. (C) 3D maple leaf structure printed using the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip and Pluronic F-127. Scale bars from left to right, 100, 200, 200, and 200 μm; top, 100 μm; and bottom, 20 μm. (D) 3D grid scaffold printed using the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip and Pluronic F-127 with B16 cancer cells suspended in solution Scale bars from left to right, 100, 200, 200, and 200 μm; top, 100 μm; and bottom, 20 μm.
Good extrusion is the combination of ink speeds and nozzle speeds that produce ideal printed lines that are continuous and uniform (61). This section commences at r ≤ 1 where vink equals or is smaller than vnozzle such that no apparent pressure buildup occurs to cause clogging/gushing or fracture of the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip (42). Printed lines in this regime demonstrate a consistent line width, approaching the inner diameter of the female mosquito proboscis of 20 to 30 μm (Fig. 4A, right). The lower boundary of the draw ratio for achieving good extrusion was determined experimentally and found to be at 0.25, below which under extrusion happened. Under extrusion is the regime when broken/noncontinuous filaments are printed. Because of the excessive stretching of the filament caused by the immense velocity contrast Δv = vnozzle − vink, the ink fractures into discontinuous segments, as shown in Fig. 4A, right. On the basis of this governing ink fracture draw ratio, the experimental failure strain of 40% (w/v) Pluronic F-127 is 3000% (see the Supplementary Materials for more details).
With the guidance of the process window, 3D necroprinting achieved a printing resolution of approximately 20 μm, which is ~250% finer than the ~50 μm inner diameter of a standard 34G dispense tip, the smallest commonly used commercial dispense tip to our knowledge. While a few suppliers offer 36G dispense tips with an inner diameter of ~35 μm, capable of achieving a printing resolution of ~40 μm, these are specialized products costing approximately $80 per dispense tip.
To evaluate the shape fidelity of printed structures, we printed an array of high-resolution structures such as a honeycomb, a maple leaf and a cell-laden scaffold (Fig. 4, B to D, and fig. S14). The first demonstration is a honeycomb structure with overall dimensions of approximately 600 μm × 600 μm × 310 μm (Fig. 4B). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, including an isotropic view and a zoomed-in section of the sidewall, highlight the high print fidelity achieved between successive layers. The extruded filaments have a printed line width of ~22 μm, enabling the fabrication of a microscopic structure that surpasses the resolution capabilities of standard metal and plastic dispense tips. Only glass-pulled dispense tips have demonstrated comparable capabilities for producing 3D designs at this scale (62, 63). The second demonstration, a maple leaf structure, exhibits even greater fidelity in printed lines between layers, with each filament clearly defined in the sidewall (Fig. 4C). The structure measures 900 μm × 870 μm × 310 μm, and its printed lines, measuring ~18 μm, exceed the resolution of the first demo, further demonstrating the potential of this biohybrid printing approach.
3D necroprinting also has the potential for advanced bioprinting applications. Demo 3 features a 600 μm × 600 μm × 310 μm grid scaffold fabricated using the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip nozzle, producing 28-μm-wide lines (Fig. 4D). The ink used in this demonstration was Pluronic F-127 containing B16 cancer cells suspended in solution (fig. S15A). The Pluronic F-127 ink was also used in a demonstration containing red blood cells (RBCs), demonstrating the capabilities of the dispense tip nozzle to print high-density cell-laden constructs (fig. S15, B to D). The printed structures expressed a post-printing cell viability of 86.1% ± 2.1% (n = 3), confirming a sufficient resistance against shear stress–induced cell-rupture susceptible during extrusion (fig. S15, E and F). This highlights the potential of 3D necroprinting for biological applications at the microscopic scale, offering high production rates and low input costs. Collectively, the three demonstrations underscore the high resolution, enhanced print fidelity, and straightforward implementation achievable with biological micro dispense tips in DIW 3D printing.
Beyond cell-laden bioprinting, we also investigated the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip’s potential for high-resolution drug delivery (fig. S16). Using hydrogel as a model drug carrier (64) and pig skin as a tissue analogue, the tip enabled both uptake and redeposition of material at the picoliter scale, mimicking therapeutic delivery in live tissue. Its elasticity and compliance reduce the risk of substrate damage compared to rigid nozzles, offering advantages for in vivo applications. Furthermore, the proboscis exhibits a defined burst pressure that passively limits extrusion forces, acting as a biological “fuse” to protect sensitive cell-laden bioinks from shear-induced damage, an intrinsic safeguard not found in synthetic micronozzles. Future studies can further investigate the benefits of using the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip for biomedical drug delivery application.
A preliminary simulation analysis has been carried out to quantify the impact of inner surface defects on the ink flow during printing (fig. S19). Surface defects, adopting the shape of a cavity/crevice, were modeled after the SEM results of the female mosquito proboscis internal structure (fig. S18) to more accurately emulate its natural state. Velocity surface profile results show the impact of surface defects and their promotion of inducing friction during fluid flow to be negligible on the ink’s velocity as it exits the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip. Simulations for perfect surface conditions and defect-ridden surface conditions show a marginal difference in outlet velocity of 0.1% (0.02 μm/s). While these simulation results offer valuable insight into the friction-induced flow behavior in the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip, future studies building on this framework could yield a more comprehensive understanding of how surface roughness influences fluid flow performance in this biological micro dispense tip.
DISCUSSION
In summary, we have successfully conceptualized, fabricated, and demonstrated the use of biological dispense tips in DIW printing processes, with the female mosquito proboscis serving as the model deposition nozzle. Through a systematic evaluation of biological micro dispense tips, we identified the female mosquito proboscis as an optimal candidate for biohybrid manufacturing. Our experiments and analysis demonstrated that the female mosquito proboscis have sufficient mechanical strength and fracture resistance for extruding commonly used inks. We further established a process window for the operation of the female mosquito proboscis nozzle. The demonstrated capabilities of 3D necroprinting include resolutions as fine as 18 to 28 μm, surpassing the ~50 μm resolution of commercially available 34G dispense tips and even outperforming specialized 36G dispense tips (~35 μm resolution), which are costly and nondegradable. In addition, we demonstrated the ability to print complex structures such as a honeycomb scaffold and a maple leaf, as well as a scaffold laden with live cells, underscoring the versatility of this biohybrid DIW process.
The glass-pulled dispense tip proves to be the only competitor capable of surpassing the resolution capabilities offered by the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip, with printed filaments achieving line widths of <1 μm (48, 65). Beyond enabling finer print resolutions, glass-pulled dispense tips, primarily manufactured from borosilicate glass, are capable of withstanding greater internal pressures, with an estimated theoretical burst pressure of approximately 20,800 kPa (see the Supplementary Materials). Although some of their technical properties are undisputably superior, other characteristics are inferior to those provided by the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip, namely fragility, consistency, biodegradability, and cost (table S3). Regarding fragility, glass-pulled dispense tips, with their extreme brittleness and high sensitivity to vibrations, constrain users with unforgiving operational limitations implemented by this fragile nature. Concerning consistency, mosquito proboscides demonstrate minimal sample variability (fig. S5) in terms of inner diameter (11% error) and wall thickness (16.5% error), while glass-pulled dispense tips require rigorous optimization of numerous process parameters (heating temperature, pulling force, pulling speed, delay between initial heating and pulling initiation, environmental conditions, etc.) and remain vulnerable to variations in the prepulled glass stock (i.e., variations between stocks in inner diameter, wall thickness, and glass material). This multivariable fabrication procedure complicates the quality control necessary to ensure consistency throughout all final glass-pulled dispense tips, primarily with respect to inner diameter, whereas the female mosquito proboscis requires nearly no quality control due to their minimal structural variability and consistent fabrication process executed by natural procedures. As for biodegradability and cost, female mosquito proboscis dispense tips are advantageous on these fronts: mosquito rearing is low cost (<$0.02 USD per mosquito, see the Supplementary Materials); and the assembly cost of a biological micro dispense tip is estimated to be ~$0.8 each, and glass-pulled dispense tips are priced at ~$26 USD per tip (Pre-Pulled Glass Pipettes, World Precision Instruments); mosquito proboscides are biodegradable, while glass-pulled dispense tips are nonbiodegradable. A detailed comparison between both dispense tips is provided in the Supplementary Materials.
The biological samples used in this work were partially screened, specifically with respect to specie and gender, while some other variables were unmonitored (see table S1). We believe conducting a study considering the structure and mechanical properties of biological micro dispense tips for variations in species, genders, age groups, and other biological variables can be a potential direction for future work, generating a more refined framework with clear guidelines for researchers when selecting specific biological samples for DIW nozzle applications.
An important consideration when integrating any biological material into an engineered biohybrid system is the natural lifespan of the biological component. Unlike traditional synthetic parts, biological elements are susceptible to material degradation over time. This transient nature can substantially impact the long-term performance of the system; to address this limitation, lifespan tests have been conducted on 10 female mosquito proboscis dispense tips. Results revealed a minimum lifespan of 9 days when stored in ambient conditions, with a 30% failure rate after a 14-day period (fig. S17). When stored under optimal conditions (−20°C in a freezer), female mosquito proboscides have been shown to remain functional after an entire year of sample aging. By accounting for the expected longevity of the biological samples, users can maximize the usage of the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip while avoiding potential operational failure caused by expiration of sample lifespan.
Female mosquito proboscides are robust to reasonable environmental variations as they derive from a natural organism that spreads throughout diverse climate regions (66). Multiple printing tests in variable ambient conditions (temperature between 20° and 30°C, relative humidity between 30 and 70%) highlighted the biological nozzle’s resilience in maintaining its structural shape and mechanical performance. Extreme conditions are suspected to substantially impact the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip, causing catastrophic failure during operation; future exploration identifying these boundaries can provide insight into extreme operational conditions for select applications.
This work validated the feasibility of using a laboratory-grown, uninfected female mosquito proboscis as a dispense tip for high-resolution printing, showcasing its potential as a low-cost, environmentally sustainable alternative to conventional metal and plastic dispense tips. Beyond the female mosquito proboscis, other biological micro dispense tips could be explored and raised in a laboratory setting to meet diverse engineering needs in a disease-free capacity, broadening the applicability of biohybrid manufacturing. Some potential candidates as biological micro dispense tip alternatives to the female mosquito proboscis are listed here: assassin bug proboscides, bed bug proboscides, tsetse fly proboscides, sandfly proboscides, and aphid proboscides (aphid proboscides offer an internal diameter of <1 μm) (67). By addressing the cost, fabrication, and sustainability challenges of conventional engineered dispense tips, this work opens avenues for integrating biotic materials into advanced manufacturing processes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bio dispense tip fabrication
Laboratory-reared, frozen, uninfected, female mosquitoes (species Aedes Aegypti) were supplied from BEI resources and stored in a freezer at −20°C. At the time of fabrication, the female mosquitoes were removed from the freezer and dipped several times in a beaker containing 80% ethanol to ensure their sterilization.
First, the labium (i.e., the mosquito proboscis’ outer sheath) is detached from the female mosquito [according to the procedure outlined in literature (28)] and discarded. Second, the fascicle is coated with an ultraviolet (UV) curable resin (UV resin by Let’s Resin) by dipping the fine tip of a toothpick into the resin and stroking the ball of resin found at the tip of the toothpick along the female mosquito fascicle. Ensure that the female mosquito proboscis outlet is oriented downward to mitigate gravity-induced flow of liquid resin into the proboscis fluid channel. The resin aggregates together at the center of the fascicle, creating a type of back-stop, leaving the native female mosquito fascicle’s biological material exposed everywhere else along the biological micro dispense tip. Third, a 3-W, 395-nm UV flashlight (UV flashlight by COSMOING, ASIN: B0B49STT1G) is shined on the female mosquito fascicle for 10 s while rotating the fascicle along its long axis to ensure even curing all throughout the resin. The fascicle is then cut on both ends using a sharp razor blade, removing the proboscis from the female mosquito’s head on one end and exposing the opposite end in case of clogging during application of the resin. The fascicle is temporarily set aside; a custom-designed adapter, fabricated using SLA printing and whose function is to ensure concentricity between the engineered dispense tip and the female mosquito proboscis, is placed in the outlet of the 30G engineered dispense tip as schematized in fig. S20. The fascicle is then carefully placed in the outlet of the concentricity adapter. Using a toothpick, the UV resin is then applied on the metal barrel of the dispense tip and spread along its long axis to cover the sidewall of the adapter and the resin bulge present on the fascicle, creating a seal between the commercial dispense tip and the biological dispense tip. Last, the UV flashlight is shined on the freshly applied resin for 10 s while slowly rotating the dispense tip along its long axis, ensuring even curing throughout the resin once again. The scalability of the fabrication procedure has been evaluated and addressed in the Supplementary Materials.
Engineered dispense tips can be repurposed by soaking the metal end of the dispense tip in acetone, followed by injecting compressed air at the inlet of the engineered dispense tip to evacuate the mosquito proboscis from its sealed location. Wipe the outlet end of the 30G dispense tip with any tissue to remove residual acetone and epoxy remaining on the outer walls. Once the outlet of the engineered dispense tip has been cleared of obstruction (validate by extruding any fluid), the engineered dispense tip can be integrated into the next assembly for reuse.
Ethanol-based sterilization is sufficient for bioprinting research due to its effectiveness against viruses and bacteria (68). For biomedical applications, advanced sterilization methods that balance sterilization efficiency with preservation of structural integrity should be considered. In particular, ethylene oxide gas, low-dose ionizing radiation, and hydrogen peroxide vapor are promising options (69). Such treatments may also be applied directly to certain printed products, such as acellular scaffolds post-printing. Future studies are needed to assess the suitability of these methods for specific applications.
Fracture pressure testing
Burst pressure properties of the female mosquito proboscis were measured via the custom DIW printer mounted with a 30-psi pressure transducer. One-milliliter syringes were loaded with deionized water and connected to the pressure transducer using a three-way Luer-Lock adapter. Air was removed from the syringe and tubes to create a pressurized system loaded with a single, noncompressible fluid. Each female mosquito proboscis dispense tip was then mounted to the syringe and water was extruded through, once again ensuring no air was present in the system. Last, with the female mosquito proboscis dispense tip still connected to the syringe, the outlet end of the proboscis was sealed with a high-strength, two-part epoxy (5 Minute Epoxy by Permatex, model number 84111) and left to cure for 10 min (i.e., until a 90% cure was achieved). The extruder mechanism was then set to apply a linear displacement of 0.0167 mm/s on the syringe plunger. The internal pressure of the apparatus was measured until catastrophic rupture of the female mosquito proboscis was achieved.
Rheological characterizations
Rheological properties of inks were measured via rotational rheometer (MCR 302, Anton Paar) with a 25-mm-diameter disposable aluminum parallel plate set to a constant gap distance of 1 mm from the base. All inks were kept at room temperature (~25°C) for 15 min before testing. Oscillatory frequency sweep tests were performed from 0.01 to 1000 Hz to measure the apparent viscosity of the inks and corresponding shear stress as a function of shear rate. To measure the dynamic viscoelastic characteristics of the inks, oscillatory stress sweep tests were performed from 0.1 to 1000 Pa and at a constant frequency of 1 Hz, generating results for storage and loss moduli as a function of shear stress. All tests were conducted at room temperature (~25°C).
Process window characterization
Measurements of the nozzle speed were provided by the motion stage software (automation 1). Measurements of the ink speed were acquired through a calibration procedure, whereby the z-axis motion stage speed was matched by the ink speed. The z-stage speed was set to the desired ink velocity, and the extruder mechanism was dynamically altered until the ideal pressure was reached, creating an equilibrium between ink speed and z-stage speed. If the z-stage speed was greater than the ink speed, the extruded filament would thin and eventually fracture. If the z-stage speed was less than the ink speed, the extruded filament would begin to bend/flow out of plane. See the Supplementary Materials for more information (fig. S13). The printed lines were executed at a layer height of 20 μm ± 3 μm.
Inks and ink synthesis
The ink used for the proof of extrusion demonstration is a ready-to-use, polyethylene oxide–based training bioink purchased and used directly from the vendor (Cellink Start, Cellink). The ink was stored at room temperature, away from light. When preparing to print, the ink was loaded into a 1-ml syringe and centrifuged at 1000 RPM for 30 s to remove air bubbles. The ink used for the honeycomb demonstration and the maple leaf demonstration is a sacrificial, temperature-sensitive, 40% (w/v) Pluronic F-127 in deionized water bioink purchased and used directly from the vendor (Pluronic F-127, Allevi). The ink was stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. When preparing to print, the ink was removed from the refrigerator 10 min before printing and immediately loaded into a 1-ml syringe while the ink was still in liquid state. The ink was set aside to reach room temperature for 10 min.
The ink used for the first cell-laden grid demonstration is Pluronic F-127 bioink with B16 cancer cells suspended in solution. B16 murine melanoma cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1% amphotericin, and 0.1% gentamicin reagent. To maintain the cells, cells were cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were passaged at 80% confluency and cells of passages 5 to 8 were used in bioprinting experiments. Pluronic F-127 of molecular weight of 12,600 g/mol (Pluronic F-127, Sigma-Aldrich, product no. P2443) was dissolved in complete cell medium at 35 wt % and allowed to dissolve overnight at 4°C. On day of printing, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), trypsinized, then labeled before use in printing. Cells were labeled with CellMask Plasma Membrane Stain Orange (CellMask Plasma Membrane Stains, Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. C10045). For the staining procedure, cells were centrifuged at 1400 RPM for 5 min, resuspended in 1× staining solution in complete medium and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Following this, cells were centrifuged, and washed in PBS twice, then resuspended in warmed 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and fixed for 10 min. Cells are subsequently centrifuged and washed thrice, counted, and split to desired quantity for printing. Cells are pellets and resuspended in chilled Pluronic F-127/medium solution at a density of 4 million cells/ml. The cell solution is pipette-mixed on ice before being loaded into 1-ml syringes for printing.
The ink used for the second cell-laden grid demonstration is Pluronic F-127 bioink embedded with RBCs. Pluronic F-127 (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in PBS at 29 wt % and allowed to dissolve overnight at 4°C. On the day of printing, RBCs were isolated from whole bovine blood (Lampire) by centrifugation at 1350 relative centrifugal force (RCF) for 5 min at 4°C. The plasma supernatant was removed, and the RBC pellet was washed three times by resuspending in ninefold excess chilled PBS, followed by centrifugation at 1350 RCF for 5 min at 4°C, and removal of the supernatant each time.
N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)–fluorescein (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 46410) was dissolved in anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide at 25 mg/ml before use. Isolated RBCs were resuspended in PBS at 10% hematocrit and combined with the NHS-fluorescein stock solution to achieve a final concentration of 0.2 mg/ml fluorescein reagent. The cell suspension was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature under gentle agitation.
Labeled RBCs were then resuspended at a 10% volume fraction in the chilled 29% Pluronic F-127 solution. This corresponds to an estimated 2 billion cells/ml in the print, calculated with an observed hematocrit of 40% and assumed 8 billion RBC/ml in the bovine whole blood (70). The cell suspension was thoroughly mixed by pipetting on ice before being loaded into 1-cc syringes for subsequent printing.
The ink used for the cell viability experiments is Pluronic F-127 bioink with B16 cancer cells suspended in solution. Five microliters of calcein-AM (component A) and 20 μl of ethidium homodimer-1 (component B) were added to 10 ml of Dulbecco’s PBS to prepare a Live/Dead (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) fluorescent PBS solution. Pluronic F127 was dissolved in this Live/Dead PBS solution at a final concentration of 29% (w/v) and sterilized by filtration through a 0.22-μm membrane filter at 4°C. B16 cells were then mixed with the fluorescent F127 solution to achieve a final cell density of 5 × 106 cells/ml. The hydrogel ink used to conduct the conceptual drug delivery experiment is 4% (w/v) low–molecular weight alginate solution (90 kDa, KIMICA, Japan) prepared in sterile DMEM (high glucose, Sigma-Aldrich).
Printing of bioinks
The paths used during the execution of the process window and the demos were manually created through the simultaneous integration of G-code and AeroScript programming. AeroScript is the custom software language used by Aerotech to control their XYZ gantry systems, which is also capable of accepting most G-code commands. Printing parameters (ink speed and nozzle speed) for all three demos were applied on the basis of the process window results. The print speed was 20 μm/s, the ink speed was approximately 14 μm/s and the layer height varied between 15 and 20 μm, depending on the variation of the proboscis in use. All demos were printed on standard 75 mm × 25 mm × 1 mm glass slides with their individual female mosquito proboscis dispense tips and constrained to nanoliter structures to minimize fabrication time (see the Supplementary Materials). All printing was executed in ambient conditions: temperature between 20° and 30°C and relative humidity between 30 and 70%.
Cell viability testing
Following printing of the Pluronic F-127 bioink with B16 cancer cells suspended in solution, the printed structures were immediately covered with DMEM high-glucose complete medium and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 6 hours. After incubation, the medium was carefully removed, and the samples were imaged using an EVOS M5000 microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
Investigation of lifespan
Lifespan of the female mosquito proboscis dispense tips were conducted by storing the female mosquito proboscis dispense tips in ambient conditions (room temperature and standard atmospheric pressure) and verifying their extrusion capabilities at intervals of 24 hours. The tests included 10 samples, and extrusion validation was performed with deionized water as the ink and recorded using a video camera mounted with a microscope lens for additional magnification.
SEM characterization
SEM images were generated via a scanning electron microscope (SU3400, Hitachi). Once each print was complete, structures were flashed with liquid N2 and immediately placed in a freeze drier for 2 to 3 days. After all humidity had been removed from the sample, the structure was mounted on a sputter coater (Q150TS, Quorum) and sputtered with platinum at 4-nm thickness.
Confocal imaging
Images were taken using a confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM 800, ZEISS). B16 cancer cell sample imaging was conducted at a magnification of 10×. Z-stacks were taken to capture all cells within the gel, taken over a range of 30 μm with a distance of 10 μm between each layer. Z-stacks were collapsed to 2D images as maximum intensity z-projections using ImageJ software. RBC sample imaging was conducted at magnifications of 10×, 20×, and 63×.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the supply of the following reagent by the NIH/NIAID Filariasis Research Reagent Resource Center for distribution through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Uninfected A. aegypti, Strain Black Eye Liverpool (Frozen), NR-48920. We thank C. Wagner from McGill University for her insightful discussion.
Funding:
C.C., J.P., Z.Z., and L.Z. acknowledge funding support from New Frontiers in Research Fund Exploration program (NFRFE-2022-00384), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery program (RGPIN-2021-02664), FRQNT New Academics program (FRQ-NT NC-298727), and Canada Foundation for Innovation John Evans Leaders Fund (CFI-G258039-41166). J.L. acknowledges the Canada Research Chair Program and NSERC-FRQNT Nova grant (FRQ-NT 2024-NOVA-344903).
Author contributions:
Conceptualization: J.P., A.A., J.L., and C.C. Methodology: J.P., Z.Y., E.J., Z.H., J.L., and C.C. Investigation: J.P., Z.Y., E.J., Z.Z., X.L., L.Z., H.H., J.L., and C.C. Visualization: J.P., E.J., Z.Z., X.L., H.H., J.L., and C.C. Resources: J.P., Z.H., A.A., M.A.C., J.L., and C.C. Supervision: J.L. and C.C. Validation: J.P., J.L., and C.C. Formal analysis: J.P., Z.Y., J.L., and C.C. Software: J.P. and Z.H. Project administration: J.P., J.L., and C.C. Funding acquisition: J.L. and C.C. Writing–original draft: J.P., E.J., J.L., and C.C. Writing–review and editing: J.P., Z.Y., E.J., L.Z., Z.H., A.A., J.L., and C.C.
Competing interests:
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability:
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.
Supplementary Materials
The PDF file includes:
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S20
Tables S1 to S4
Legends for movies S1 to S7
References
- Download
- 3.01 MB
Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:
- Download
- 223.82 MB
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1
N. Huebsch, D. J. Mooney, Inspiration and application in the evolution of biomaterials. Nature 462, 426–432 (2009).
2
B. Bhushan, Biomimetics: Lessons from nature–An overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. Math. Phys. Eng. 367, 1445–1486 (2009).
3
R. Meyer, W. Hage, D. W. Bechert, M. Schatz, T. Knacke, F. Thiele, Separation control by self-activated movable flaps. AIAA J 45, 191–199 (2007).
4
K.-Z. Ivanic, Z. Tadic, M. A. Omazic, Biomimicry–An overview. Holistic Approach Environ. 5, 19–36 (2015).
5
D. C. Shin, B. E. Jin, Do fur coats symbolize status or stigma? Examining the effect of perceived stigma on female consumers’ purchase intentions toward fur coats. Fash. Text. 8, 10 (2021).
6
K. Haneca, K. Deforce, Wood use in early medieval weapon production. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 12, 1–16 (2020).
7
C. Appiah, C. Arndt, K. Siemsen, A. Heitmann, A. Staubitz, C. Selhuber-Unkel, Living materials herald a new era in soft robotics. Adv. Mater. 31, e1807747 (2019).
8
L. Ricotti, B. Trimmer, A. W. Feinberg, R. Raman, K. K. Parker, R. Bashir, M. Sitti, S. Martel, P. Dario, A. Menciassi, Biohybrid actuators for robotics: A review of devices actuated by living cells. Sci. Robot. 2, 29 (2017).
9
V. A. Webster-Wood, O. Akkus, U. A. Gurkan, H. J. Chiel, R. D. Quinn, Organismal engineering: Toward a robotic taxonomic key for devices using organic materials. Sci. Robot. 2, 29 (2017).
10
A. W. Feinberg, A. Feigel, S. S. Shevkoplyas, S. Sheehy, G. M. Whitesides, K. K. Parker, Muscular thin films for building actuators and powering devices. Science 317, 1366–1370 (2007).
11
L. Zhu, H. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Pi, S. Zhou, Preliminary study of an intestinal bio-robot system based on nerve stimulation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 9, 68 (2012).
12
K. Shoji, K. Morishima, Y. Akiyama, N. Nakamura, H. Ohno, “Autonomous environmental monitoring by self-powered biohybrid robot” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (IEEE, 2016), pp. 629–634.
13
F. Cao, C. Zhang, T. T. Vo Doan, Y. Li, D. H. Sangi, J. S. Koh, N. A. Huynh, M. F. Bin Aziz, H. Y. Choo, K. Ikeda, P. Abbeel, M. M. Maharbiz, H. Sato, A biological micro actuator: Graded and closed-loop control of insect leg motion by electrical stimulation of muscles. PLOS ONE 9, e105389 (2014).
14
T. F. Yap, Z. Liu, A. Rajappan, T. J. Shimokusu, D. J. Preston, Necrobotics: Biotic materials as ready-to-use actuators. Adv. Sci. 9, e2201174 (2022).
15
F. Kong, L. Yuan, Y. F. Zheng, W. Chen, Automatic liquid handling for life science: A critical review of the current state of the art. SLAS Technol. 17, 169–185 (2012).
16
C. Klumpp-Thomas, H. Kalish, M. Drew, S. Hunsberger, K. Snead, M. P. Fay, J. Mehalko, A. Shunmugavel, V. Wall, P. Frank, J.-P. Denson, M. Hong, G. Gulten, S. Messing, J. Hicks, S. Michael, W. Gillette, M. D. Hall, M. J. Memoli, D. Esposito, K. Sadtler, Standardization of ELISA protocols for serosurveys of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic using clinical and at-home blood sampling. Nat. Commun. 12, 113 (2021).
17
N. Thielen, W. Pan, N. Piechulek, C. Voigt, S. Meier, K. Schmidt, J. Franke, “Machine learning based quality prediction for solder paste dispensing in electronics production,” in 2022 IEEE 24th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 858–863.
18
Z. Lyu, G. J. H. Lim, J. J. Koh, Y. Li, Y. Ma, J. Ding, J. Wang, Z. Hu, J. Wang, W. Chen, Y. Chen, Design and manufacture of 3D-printed batteries. Joule 5, 89–114 (2021).
19
A. Tucak, M. Sirbubalo, L. Hindija, O. Rahić, J. Hadžiabdić, K. Muhamedagić, A. Čekić, E. Vranić, Microneedles: Characteristics, materials, production methods and commercial development. Micromachines (Basel) 11, 961 (2020).
20
B. Y. Ahn, E. B. Duoss, M. J. Motala, X. Guo, S.-I. Park, Y. Xiong, J. Yoon, R. G. Nuzzo, J. A. Rogers, J. A. Lewis, Omnidirectional printing of flexible, stretchable, and spanning silver microelectrodes. Science 323, 1590–1593 (2009).
21
J. Yang, X. Liu, Y. Fu, Y. Song, Recent advances of microneedles for biomedical applications: Drug delivery and beyond. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 9, 469–483 (2019).
22
S. V. Murphy, A. Atala, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 773–785 (2014).
23
H. W. Krenn, H. Aspöck, Form, function and evolution of the mouthparts of blood-feeding Arthropoda. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 41, 101–118 (2012).
24
M. E. Olson, J. A. Rosell, Vessel diameter–stem diameter scaling across woody angiosperms and the ecological causes of xylem vessel diameter variation. New Phytol. 197, 1204–1213 (2013).
25
A. D. R. Li, K. B. Putra, L. Chen, J. S. Montgomery, A. Shih, Mosquito proboscis-inspired needle insertion to reduce tissue deformation and organ displacement. Sci. Rep. 10, 12248 (2020).
26
Z. Ma, R. Huo, A. Nottegar, C. Chung-Tze-Cheong, Q. Gao, X. Lan, Z. Gao, J. Li, Bioinspired printable tough adhesives with in situ benignly triggered mechanical enhancements. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2403290 (2024).
27
G. Bao, T. Jiang, H. Ravanbakhsh, A. Reyes, Z. Ma, M. Strong, H. Wang, J. M. Kinsella, J. Li, L. Mongeau, Triggered micropore-forming bioprinting of porous viscoelastic hydrogels. Mater. Horiz. 7, 2336–2347 (2020).
28
N. J. Ljubich, J. Puma, Z. X. Zhang, J. Li, C. Cao, Development of a bio-hybrid mosquito stinger-based atomic force microscopy probe. J. Vis. Exp., 10.3791/66675 (2024).
29
M. M. Dugon, A. Black, W. Arthur, Variation and specialisation of the forcipular apparatus of centipedes (Arthropoda: Chilopoda): A comparative morphometric and microscopic investigation of an evolutionary novelty. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 41, 231–243 (2012).
30
J. J. Calvete, C. Marcinkiewicz, D. Monleón, V. Esteve, B. Celda, P. Juárez, L. Sanz, Snake venom disintegrins: Evolution of structure and function. Toxicon 45, 1063–1074 (2005).
31
N. R. Casewell, W. Wüster, F. J. Vonk, R. A. Harrison, B. G. Fry, Complex cocktails: The evolutionary novelty of venoms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 219–229 (2013).
32
Z.-L. Zhao, T. Shu, X.-Q. Feng, Study of biomechanical, anatomical, and physiological properties of scorpion stingers for developing biomimetic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 58, 1112–1121 (2016).
33
Z. L. Zhao, H. P. Zhao, G. J. Ma, C. W. Wu, K. Yang, X. Q. Feng, Structures, properties, and functions of the stings of honey bees and paper wasps: A comparative study. Biol. Open 4, 921–928 (2015).
34
K. Jackson, The evolution of venom-conducting fangs: Insights from developmental biology. Toxicon 49, 975–981 (2007).
35
J.-L. Chao, H.-W. Chang, Variation of the poison duct in Chilopoda centipedes from Taiwan. Nor. J. Entomol. 53, 139–151 (2006).
36
A. J. Kohn, J. W. Nybakken, J. J. Van Mol, Radula tooth structure of the gastropod Conus imperialis elucidated by scanning electron microscopy. Science 176, 49–51 (1972).
37
A. Rogalski, S. W. A. Himaya, R. J. Lewis, Coordinated adaptations define the ontogenetic shift from worm- to fish-hunting in a venomous cone snail. Nat. Commun. 14, 3287 (2023).
38
J. Mauseth, Botany: An Introduction to Plant Biology (Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, Massachusetts, ed. 6, 2016).
39
H. W. Krenn, Insect Mouthparts (Springer, 2019), vol. 5.
40
C. Reinwald, J. A.-S. Bauder, F. Karolyi, M. Neulinger, S. Jaros, B. Metscher, H. W. Krenn, Evolutionary functional morphology of the proboscis and feeding apparatus of hawk moths (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera). J. Morphol. 283, 1390–1410 (2022).
41
Q. Zheng, B. Xie, Z. Xu, H. Wu, A systematic printability study of direct ink writing towards high-resolution rapid manufacturing. Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 5, 035002 (2023).
42
H. Yuk, X. Zhao, A new 3D printing strategy by harnessing deformation, instability, and fracture of viscoelastic inks. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704028 (2018).
43
S. Naghieh, X. Chen, Printability–A key issue in extrusion-based bioprinting. J. Pharm. Anal. 11, 564–579 (2021).
44
D. Gurera, B. Bhushan, N. Kumar, Lessons from mosquitoes’ painless piercing. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 84, 178–187 (2018).
45
B. Bhushan, Insects locomotion, piercing, sucking and stinging mechanisms. Microsyst. Technol. 24, 4703–4728 (2018).
46
G. G. Robinson, The mouthparts and their function in the female mosquito, Anopheles maculipennis. Parasitology 31, 212–242 (1939).
47
R. F. Chapman, The Insects Structure and Function (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, ed. 5, 2013).
48
G. M. Gratson, F. García-Santamaría, V. Lousse, M. Xu, S. Fan, J. A. Lewis, P. V. Braun, Direct-write assembly of three-dimensional photonic crystals: Conversion of polymer scaffolds to silicon hollow-woodpile structures. Adv. Mater. 18, 461–465 (2006).
49
P. Hoffmann, B. Dutoit, R.-P. Salathé, Comparison of mechanically drawn and protection layer chemically etched optical fiber tips. Ultramicroscopy 61, 165–170 (1995).
50
N. Pak, M. J. Dergance, M. T. Emerick, E. B. Gagnon, C. R. Forest, An instrument for controlled, automated production of micrometer scale fused silica pipettes. J. Mech. Des. 133, 061006 (2011).
51
J. Sehgal, S. Ito, Brittleness of glass. J. Non Cryst. Solids 253, 126–132 (1999).
52
M. I. Bro, D. I. McCane, J. C. Reed, D. B. Allen, “Perfluoroalkoxy fluorocarbon resin properties relating to electrical and electronic applications,” in 29th International Wire and Cable Symposium (Cherry Hill, 1980), pp. 94–100.
53
J. Hu, Y. Li, C. Li, W. Chen, D. Yang, Mechanical properties of fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) foils in use for neutrino detector project. Polym. Test 59, 362–370 (2017).
54
P. J. Rae, E. N. Brown, The properties of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) in tension. Polymer 46, 8128–8140 (2005).
55
T. A. Philpot, Mechanics of Materials (ed. 4, 2017).
56
R.-R. Liu, L.-B. Mao, S.-H. Yu, Strong and tough chitin hydrogel constructed by dehydration and rehydration strategy. Nano Res. 17, 8192–8199 (2024).
57
G. Dimmock, “The Anatomy of Mouth-Parts and of the Sucking Apparatus of Some Diptera,” thesis, Leipzig University (1881).
58
A. Peterson, The Head-Capsule and Mouth-Parts of Diptera (ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1916), vol. 3, pp. 177–282.
59
R. Ashena, F. Badrouchi, A. Elmgerbi, S. Mishani, F. Sotoudeh, S. Nekoeian, Stepwise mathematical derivation of the Herschel–Bulkley laminar fluid flow equations—In pipes. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 13, 625–643 (2023).
60
R. P. Chhabra, J. F. Richardson, Non-Newtonian Fluid Behaviour (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999).
61
R. Huo, G. Bao, Z. He, X. Li, Z. Ma, Z. Yang, R. Moakhar, S. Jiang, C. Chung-Tze-Cheong, A. Nottegar, C. Cao, S. Mahshid, J. Li, Tough transient ionic junctions printed with ionic microgels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2213677 (2023).
62
J. A. Lewis, G. M. Gratson, Direct writing in three dimensions. Mater. Today 7, 32–39 (2004).
63
Y.-G. Park, H. S. An, J.-Y. Kim, J.-U. Park, High-resolution, reconfigurable printing of liquid metals with three-dimensional structures. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2844 (2019).
64
D. M. Hariyadi, N. Islam, Current status of alginate in drug delivery. Adv. Pharmacol. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 8886095 (2020).
65
F. Rezaei, D. O. Carlsson, J. Hedin Dahlstrom, J. Lindh, S. Johansson, Direct ink writing of high-resolution cellulose structures. Sci. Rep. 13, 22044 (2023).
66
W. A. Foster, E. D. Walker, Medical and Veterinary Entomology (Elsevier, 2019).
67
A. R. Forbes, Aphids As Virus Vectors (Elsevier, 1977).
68
A. Kramer, M. Arvand, B. Christiansen, S. Dancer, M. Eggers, M. Exner, D. Müller, N. T. Mutters, I. Schwebke, D. Pittet, Ethanol is indispensable for virucidal hand antisepsis: Memorandum from the alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) Task Force, WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, and the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. Antimicrob. Resist Infect. Control 11, 93 (2022).
69
W. A. Rutala, D. J. Weber, “Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008” (2008).
70
L. Roland, M. Drillich, M. Iwersen, Hematology as a diagnostic tool in bovine medicine. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 26, 592–598 (2014).
71
G. Seiler, “Syringes & Injection Needle Manufacturing in the US” (2023).
72
J. Emmermacher, D. Spura, J. Cziommer, D. Kilian, T. Wollborn, U. Fritsching, J. Steingroewer, T. Walther, M. Gelinsky, A. Lode, Engineering considerations on extrusion-based bioprinting: Interactions of material behavior, mechanical forces and cells in the printing needle. Biofabrication 12, 025022 (2020).
73
M. A. S. R. Saadi, A. Maguire, N. T. Pottackal, M. S. H. Thakur, M. M. Ikram, A. J. Hart, P. M. Ajayan, M. M. Rahman, Direct ink writing: A 3D printing technology for diverse materials. Adv. Mater. 34, e2108855 (2022).
74
P. J. Pritchard, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, ed. 8, 2011).
75
R. L. Norton, Machine Design An Integrated Approach (Prentice Hall, ed. 4, 2011).
76
H. Tada, P. C. Paris, G. R. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Third Edition (ASME Press, 2000).
77
B. Derby, Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: Fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution. Annu. Rev. Mat. Res. 40, 395–414 (2010).
78
P. R. Desai, N. J. Jain, R. K. Sharma, P. Bahadur, Effect of additives on the micellization of PEO/PPO/PEO block copolymer F127 in aqueous solution. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 178, 57–69 (2001).
80
N. Bouras, M. A. Madjoubi, M. Kolli, S. Benterki, M. Hamidouche, Thermal and mechanical characterization of borosilicate glass. Phys. Procedia 2, 1135–1140 (2009).