Science’s 2025 Breakthrough of the Year: The unstoppable rise of renewable energy

16 min read Original article ↗

2025 Breakthrough of the year

Good morning, sunshine

The seemingly unstoppable growth of renewable energy is Science’s 2025 Breakthrough of the Year

Since the Industrial Revolution, human society has run on ancient solar energy—captured by plants hundreds of millions of years ago, stored in fossil fuels, and dug and drilled from the earth. But this year momentum shifted unmistakably toward the energy that streams from the Sun today. Renewable energy, most of it from sunlight itself or from wind, ultimately driven by the Sun, overtook conventional energy on multiple fronts.

This year, renewables surpassed coal as a source of electricity worldwide, and solar and wind energy grew fast enough to cover the entire increase in global electricity use from January to June, according to energy think tank Ember. In September, Chinese President Xi Jinping declared at the United Nations that his country will cut its carbon emissions by as much as 10% in a decade, not by using less energy, but by doubling down on wind and solar. And solar panel imports in Africa and South Asia have soared, as people in those regions realized rooftop solar can cheaply power lights, cellphones, and fans. To many, the continued growth of renewables now seems unstoppable—a prospect that has led Science to name the renewable energy surge its 2025 Breakthrough of the Year.

Two schoolchildren stand near a building and look up toward the tin roof, where there are two small solar panels.

Small rooftop solar systems provide a cheap and reliable source of energy for residents of the Kibera slums of Nairobi, Kenya.Donwilson Odhiambo/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

That promise comes against a backdrop of downbeat news, highlighted at the U.N. climate meeting in Belém, Brazil, in November. Global carbon emissions continue to creep up as countries fall short of cuts pledged in the 2015 Paris climate agreement. The goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C—always a long shot—now seems completely out of reach. But Hannah Ritchie, a data scientist at the University of Oxford and a climate blogger, is among those who see hope. Thanks to renewables, the long-awaited decline of fossil fuels is in sight, she says. China is “just, just on the cusp … of actually starting to push out coal,” and fossil fuel use in the rest of the world is likely to follow.

China’s mighty industrial engine is the driver. After years of patiently nurturing the sector through subsidies, China now dominates global production of renewable energy technologies. It makes 80% of the world’s solar cells, 70% of its wind turbines, and 70% of its lithium batteries, at prices no competitor can match. “China really mastered this … with the help of the scale of its economy, its manufacturing capacity, and the fierce competition right at home,” says Li Shuo, director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

As production surged, prices fell and demand took off. Production scaled up to keep pace, further driving down prices and igniting more demand. The result was a virtuous circle in which renewable technologies grew into an industry that now accounts for more than 10% of China’s economy. Wind and solar became the cheapest energy in much of the world.

The tsunami of tech spilling from China’s factories has changed the country’s energy landscape—and its physical one, too. For decades China’s development was synonymous with coal, which produced choking air pollution and massive carbon emissions, still greater than those of all other developed nations combined. Now, solar panels carpet deserts and the high, sunstruck plateau of Tibet, and wind turbines up to 300 meters tall guard coastlines and hilltops (see photo essay, below). China’s solar power generation grew more than 20-fold over the past decade, and its solar and wind farms now have enough capacity to power the entire United States.

China’s burgeoning exports of green tech are transforming the rest of the world, too. Europe is a longtime customer, but countries in the Global South are also rushing to buy China’s solar panels, batteries, and wind turbines, spurred by market forces and a desire for energy independence. In Pakistan, for example, imports of Chinese solar panels grew fivefold from 2022 to ’24 as the Ukraine war pushed up natural gas prices and the cost of grid power. “For people who were asking, ‘How am I going to keep the lights on in my home,’ it was a very obvious choice,” says Lauri Myllyvirta, an analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. In South Africa, old and unreliable coal plants drove a similar dynamic. Ethiopia has embraced solar and wind amid worries that hydropower, the country’s mainstay, will decline as droughts become more frequent.

Aiming high

Falling prices have propelled a surge in solar and wind energy that far outstrips the growth of any other source. This chart shows installed capacity, a comparison that favors solar and wind, which can produce at full power only a few hours a day, unlike fossil and nuclear. But renewable sources together generated more electricity this year than coal.

Line chart showing global installed electricity capacity (gigawatts) for various energy categories, from 2000 to 2025. Solar was close to zero from 2000 to 2007, but then rose exponentially to over 2500 gigawatts in 2025. Coal and natural gas had the highest installed capacity for nearly the entire period, increasing steadily from about 1100 and 1000 gigawatts to about 2300 and 2000 gigawatts, respectively. But solar overtook natural gas in 2024 and coal in 2025. Wind has also risen steadily; hydropower and other renewables have also risen, with increasing growth since 2020; nuclear, oil, and bioenergy have stayed relatively stable near the bottom of the chart, under 500 gigawatts.

*2025 data are full-year estimates. Installed capacity includes grid-connected assets and some off-grid systems.

(Graphic) V. Penney/Science; (Data) Ember; BNEF

So far, this is not a story of new technology. China is “more or less relying on the same core [solar] technology that the United States invented half a century ago,” Li says. In those days the U.S. made boutique panels for spacecraft; now, China makes them for the world—better, vastly cheaper, and in staggering quantities.

Technological progress could power future gains. Solar cells today are made of crystalline silicon, but another kind of crystal, perovskites, can be layered in tandem with silicon to make cells that gain efficiency by capturing more colors of light. Material advances are enabling wind turbine blades to get longer and harvest more energy, while designs for floating turbines could vastly expand the offshore areas in which they could be deployed. And the giant lithium-ion batteries now used to store energy when sunshine and wind falter could one day give way to other chemistries. Vanadium flow batteries and sodium batteries could be cheaper; zinc-air batteries could hold far more energy.

In the meantime, climate scientists are already seeing benefits from the existing technology. This year renewables helped bring the growth of greenhouse emissions to a virtual standstill in China and put a global carbon peak within reach. But to meaningfully cut emissions, the world needs to treat the thresholds crossed this year as just a starting point.

“It is worrying to me that China continues to build coal,” says Kelly Sims Gallagher, an energy and climate expert at Tufts University. Dozens of new plants were commissioned in the past year, though many sit idle, waiting to be fired up as “peakers” to meet spikes in demand. In the U.S., President Donald Trump’s administration has declared war on wind and solar development, and cheap Chinese solar panels face formidable trade barriers. U.S. coal consumption is rising this year after a long decline.

The infrastructure needed to take full advantage of wind and solar is another hurdle. China is building battery farms to store green power and long-distance transmission lines to get it to cities, but perhaps not fast enough. Air travel and heavy industries won’t be electrified anytime soon.

But if concerns lurk in the future, looking back brings home the astonishing progress renewables have made. In 2004, it took the world a full year to install 1 gigawatt of solar power capacity. Today, twice that amount goes online each day. Back then renewables had an aura of virtue: Buyers paid a premium over fossil energy because of climate concerns. Now, the real driver is self-interest: lower cost and greater energy security.

That change in motivation may be the most important breakthrough of all, ensuring that this year’s inflection points are just the beginning.

Photo essay

A rolling hill covered in solar panels, with turbines visible in the distance. A narrow road winds through the field of panels. A one-story building near the road has solar panels covering its entire roof.

Solar panels armor a hillside in China’s Anhui province, parting only for an access road. Distant ridges host wind turbines, another fast-growing component of an energy revolution that has helped ease air pollution and halt the growth of China’s carbon emissions.George Steinmetz

The green giant

Images of China’s clean energy infrastructure reveal a transformation of unmatched scale and speed

China’s turn to green energy dwarfs any other country’s, as a parade of astonishing numbers attests. In 2024 alone it installed new solar and wind generation equivalent to roughly 100 nuclear power plants, and the pace quickened early this year. Dozens of new, ultrahigh-voltage power lines are marching thousands of kilometers from western deserts where much of the solar energy is generated to the eastern cities where it is used. Hungrily awaiting the bounty of clean energy are millions of electric cars and a sprawling network of high-speed electric trains that can zip between cities 1000 kilometers apart in a morning.

China’s landscape reflects this metamorphosis. The vistas of smog, smokestacks, and coal heaps still exist, but glinting silicon panels now cover hills, deserts, and lakes. One solar farm on the Tibetan Plateau spans more than 400 square kilometers, an area more than twice the size of Washington, D.C. Wind turbines grow ever bigger; one meant for use offshore has blades 150 meters long. Arrays of house-size lithium batteries stockpile excess energy, and more is stored in mountaintop reservoirs, pumped full of water when energy is abundant and tapped as needed by allowing the water to cascade through turbines to a lower lake. The factories that produce the solar panels, turbines, batteries, and cars have added new industrial sprawl—but often without the smokestacks because they are electrified.

These days, the containers in China’s busy ports are packed with new wares: electric cars, solar cells, wind turbine blades. In building up its own green energy system, China has also created an export industry worth nearly $180 billion in 2024, putting low-cost renewable energy within reach for much of the rest of the world (see story, above). The revolution these images document is now going global.

Breakdowns

Trump roils U.S. science

Protesters holding signs with the messages “Knowlege > Ignorance”, “Science Saves Lives”, and “Restore Research Funding”.

Protesters gathered at a Stand Up for Science rally in San Francisco in March.Gabrielle Lurie/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images

President Donald Trump began to rewrite the playbook on how the U.S. government interacts with the research community within minutes of taking office on 20 January. Seemingly every week since then he has added a page, shattering decades-old norms that helped make the United States a scientific superpower.

The now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by billionaire Elon Musk, played a prominent role in the first few months. It forced the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) to cancel thousands of existing projects, in particular those deemed to involve diversity, equity, and inclusion; climate change; or gender identity and sexual orientation.

Trump also used DOGE to spearhead another prong of the attack: shrinking the size of the federal workforce. Thousands of employees at science agencies were laid off, accepted buyout offers, quit, or retired sooner than planned, resulting in a significant loss of scientific experience. Many of those who remained are managing narrower portfolios after their agency pulled the plug on scores of programs the White House decided—suddenly, and without explanation—were “no longer aligned with the administration’s priorities.” NSF and the Department of Energy’s Office of Science have gone even further, revamping units to correspond more closely to those priorities.

Several of Trump’s choices to lead federal science agencies have triggered fierce opposition. Foremost among them is Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a lawyer and longtime antivaccine activist. Kennedy has decimated senior management at NIH, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, along with a vast network of advisory committees. The new heads of those agencies share some of Kennedy’s contrarian views on public health and have altered many existing policies. NIH, for example, added criteria that could politicize its choices about what grant applications to fund.

Claiming to find evidence of antisemitism, the Trump administration froze all federal grants to a handful of top-tier colleges and universities and threatened similar action at scores more. Some agreed to pay sizable settlements and allow greater federal oversight in return for lifting those freezes, while negotiations continue with other schools, notably Harvard University and the University of California, Los Angeles.

An aggressive campaign to detain and deport people alleged to lack valid immigration status has made graduate students on valid visas fearful that they may be detained after traveling abroad, and led to fewer new international students at most U.S. colleges and universities. In response, many institutions have reduced the size of their doctoral programs in science and engineering.

Research advocates have fought many Trump directives in court, with mixed success. Arguably the community’s biggest win to date was blocking attempts by four science agencies to slash payments to universities for so-called indirect costs—money spent on infrastructure and overhead that supports federally funded research. Another silver lining in this gloomy year was that both NSF and NIH managed to spend all the money Congress had given them this year despite the many disruptions to their grantmaking. And Congress appears likely to resist Trump’s request for sharp cuts in the 2026 budgets of most science agencies. Equally important, most of this year’s onslaught has been carried out not through permanent legislation, but through temporary executive orders that Trump’s successor could rescind.

Global health in crisis

A woman sitting on a hospital bed covers her face with the end of her headscarf. Next to her on the bed, a small child lies with one hand at its face and one arm outstretched on the bed. A hand is reaching in from the side of the frame to touch the woman's shoulder as though in comfort.

A mother cries after her infant son was diagnosed with severe malaria at a hospital in Guinea, where the freeze on U.S. aid has disrupted efforts to control the disease.Marta Moreiras

For decades, aid for global health had solid support across the political spectrum in many countries. But this year marked a dramatic turnaround as wealthy countries slashed billions in funding for organizations that fight disease and malnutrition in other parts of the world.

In January, after President Donald Trump took office, the United States froze all foreign aid, including more than $10 billion for global health, and dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development. The moves halted deliveries of food and drugs and triggered thousands of layoffs in the U.S. and abroad, although some of the funds were reinstated later in the year. Aid budgets in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland have tumbled as well, in part to make room for increased defense spending.

A July report from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation estimated that donations for global health would fall to $39.1 billion this year—a 21% drop. Groups such as the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria; the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance all have to tighten their belts as a result. The World Health Organization, in which the U.S. has canceled its membership, has been hardest hit proportionally and is going through a painful downsizing.

The cuts are already noticeable on the ground, and will get worse. In July, the Global Fund slashed existing grants for all three diseases it helps fight, forcing countries to scale back spending on commodities such as medicines, diagnostics, insecticides, and bed nets. UNAIDS has reported severe disruptions in HIV prevention and testing in many countries.

Studies modeling the effects of the recent cuts predict a surge in disease cases and deaths, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Some countries may mitigate the toll by shouldering more of the burden themselves, however, and new donors may step up. But because many poor countries don’t always record causes of death, the precise toll of the shifting political winds may never be known.

AI and fraud degrade the literature

This year several studies exposed how paper mills, artificial intelligence (AI), and research fraud are polluting the scholarly literature with trivial, shoddy, and nonsensical papers—and the pace is accelerating.

An unusually thorough analysis of this long-standing issue found that the number of fake papers—though still relatively small—seems to be increasing far faster than the scientific literature overall. At fault is a complex ecosystem of authors, editors, publishers, and others conspiring to pad authors’ CVs—and the pockets of editors and publishers who profit from article-processing fees for the fake papers and sometimes even take bribes.

The continued rise of AI is also shaping the literature. A massive, cross-disciplinary look at how often scientists turn to AI to help write their manuscripts found steady increases since 2022. Some uses may be legitimate—for instance, if they are disclosed to the journal upon submission and align with the journal’s policy. But disclosure may be the exception. The American Association for Cancer Research recently found that four times as many authors use AI as admit to it across the 10 journals it publishes.

The transgressions may go beyond nondisclosure. One study reported that unscrupulous actors were using publicly available health data sets—and likely generative AI tools—to churn out trivial papers exploring correlations between nearly every possible combination of condition, contributing factor, and population. Authors are also using AI to concoct letters to the editor and other simple commentaries that have little substance and are simply intended to inflate the author’s publication record, another team reported.

Some publishers are beginning to take aggressive countermeasures. In July, Taylor & Francis paused submissions to its journal Bioengineered so editors could investigate some 1000 papers suspected of containing manipulated results or coming from paper mills. And in September, PLOS and Frontiers announced they had begun to automatically reject the vast majority of papers based on those exploited public health data sets. But the arms race between publishers and AI-fueled malfeasance is sure to continue to escalate.

Multimedia

aerial view of groups of wind turbine blades lined up

By

  • Sarah Crespi, Meagan Cantwell, Greg Miller, David Grimm

On this week’s show: Science names this year’s most significant advance, and we survey the best from our online news section