Host circuit engagement of human cortical organoids transplanted in rodents

12 min read Original article ↗
  • Protocol
  • Published:

Nature Protocols volume 19pages 3542–3567 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Human neural organoids represent promising models for studying neural function; however, organoids grown in vitro lack certain microenvironments and sensory inputs that are thought to be essential for maturation. The transplantation of patient-derived neural organoids into animal hosts helps overcome some of these limitations and offers an approach for neural organoid maturation and circuit integration. Here, we describe a method for transplanting human stem cell–derived cortical organoids (hCOs) into the somatosensory cortex of newborn rats. The differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into hCOs occurs over 30–60 days, and the transplantation procedure itself requires ~0.5–1 hours per animal. The use of neonatal hosts provides a developmentally appropriate stage for circuit integration and allows the generation and experimental manipulation of a unit of human neural tissue within the cortex of a living animal host. After transplantation, animals can be maintained for hundreds of days, and transplanted hCO growth can be monitored by using brain magnetic resonance imaging. We describe the assessment of human neural circuit function in vivo by monitoring genetically encoded calcium responses and extracellular activity. To demonstrate human neuron–host functional integration, we also describe a procedure for engaging host neural circuits and for modulating animal behavior by using an optogenetic behavioral training paradigm. The transplanted human neurons can then undergo ex vivo characterization across modalities including dendritic morphology reconstruction, single-nucleus transcriptomics, optogenetic manipulation and electrophysiology. This approach may enable the discovery of cellular phenotypes from patient-derived cells and uncover mechanisms that contribute to human brain evolution from previously inaccessible developmental stages.

Key points

  • The protocol involves surgical implantation of human cortical organoids in the cerebral cortex of rat pups. Organoid growth is monitored by using MRI, whereas their functional integration in the host neural circuitry is carried out by using behavioral, electrophysiological and optogenetic approaches.

  • Transplanted organoids enable multimodal genomic measurements from millions of cells, facilitating characterization of human–human and human–rodent cellular interactions, including neural circuit activity patterns and relationships between glia and neurons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$32.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data discussed in this protocol are available in the supporting primary research paper18. Single-cell gene expression raw data are available under the Gene Expression Omnibus accession number GSE190815. Additional raw datasets are available for research purposes from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

Code used for data processing and analysis are available on request from the corresponding author. For additional details on processing calcium imaging data, see our recently published STAR protocol45. The code used to analyze snRNA-seq data is available for download from https://github.com/kkelley85/Transplant_organoid_snRNAseq.

References

  1. Pașca, S. P. The rise of three-dimensional human brain cultures. Nature 553, 437–445 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelley, K. W. & Pașca, S. P. Human brain organogenesis: toward a cellular understanding of development and disease. Cell 185, 42–61 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mansour, A. A., Schafer, S. T. & Gage, F. H. Cellular complexity in brain organoids: current progress and unsolved issues. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 111, 32–39 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Lullo, E. & Kriegstein, A. R. The use of brain organoids to investigate neural development and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 573–584 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Velasco, S., Paulsen, B. & Arlotta, P. 3D brain organoids: studying brain development and disease outside the embryo. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 43, 375–389 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qian, X., Song, H. & Ming, G. Brain organoids: advances, applications and challenges. Development 146, dev166074 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasai, Y. Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architecture. Nature 493, 318–326 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lancaster, M. A. & Knoblich, J. A. Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science 345, 1247125 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pașca, S. P. et al. A nomenclature consensus for nervous system organoids and assembloids. Nature 609, 907–910 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Velasco, S. et al. Individual brain organoids reproducibly form cell diversity of the human cerebral cortex. Nature 570, 523–527 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Qian, X. et al. Brain-region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell 165, 1238–1254 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Paşca, A. M. et al. Functional cortical neurons and astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in 3D culture. Nat. Methods 12, 671–678 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sloan, S. A. et al. Human astrocyte maturation captured in 3D cerebral cortical spheroids derived from pluripotent stem cells. Neuron 95, 779–790.e6 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoon, S.-J. et al. Reliability of human cortical organoid generation. Nat. Methods 16, 75–78 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trevino, A. E. et al. Chromatin accessibility dynamics in a model of human forebrain development. Science 367, eaay1645 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon, A. et al. Long-term maturation of human cortical organoids matches key early postnatal transitions. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 331–342 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sloan, S. A., Andersen, J., Pașca, A. M., Birey, F. & Pașca, S. P. Generation and assembly of human brain region–specific three-dimensional cultures. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2062–2085 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Revah, O. et al. Maturation and circuit integration of transplanted human cortical organoids. Nature 610, 319–326 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bjorklund, A. & Stenevi, U. Neural Grafting in the Mammalian CNS (Elsevier, 1985).

  20. Strömberg, I., Bygdeman, M., Goldstein, M., Seiger, Å. & Olson, L. Human fetal substantia nigra grafted to the dopamine-denervated striatum of immunosuppressed rats: evidence for functional reinnervation. Neurosci. Lett. 71, 271–276 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brundin, P. et al. Behavioural effects of human fetal dopamine neurons grafted in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Brain Res. 65, 235–240 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Strömberg, I. et al. Intracerebral xenografts of human mesencephalic tissue into athymic rats: immunochemical and in vivo electrochemical studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8331–8334 (1988).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kriks, S. et al. Dopamine neurons derived from human ES cells efficiently engraft in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Nature 480, 547–551 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Grealish, S. et al. Human ESC-derived dopamine neurons show similar preclinical efficacy and potency to fetal neurons when grafted in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Stem Cell 15, 653–665 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Espuny-Camacho, I. et al. Pyramidal neurons derived from human pluripotent stem cells integrate efficiently into mouse brain circuits in vivo. Neuron 77, 440–456 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Linaro, D. et al. Xenotransplanted human cortical neurons reveal species-specific development and functional integration into mouse visual circuits. Neuron 104, 972–986.e6 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Real, R. et al. In vivo modeling of human neuron dynamics and Down syndrome. Science 362, eaau1810 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Maroof, A. M. et al. Directed differentiation and functional maturation of cortical interneurons from human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 12, 559–572 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nicholas, C. R. et al. Functional maturation of hPSC-derived forebrain interneurons requires an extended timeline and mimics human neural development. Cell Stem Cell 12, 573–586 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Han, X. et al. Forebrain engraftment by human glial progenitor cells enhances synaptic plasticity and learning in adult mice. Cell Stem Cell 12, 342–353 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mansour, A. A. et al. An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 432–441 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson, M. N. et al. Multimodal monitoring of human cortical organoids implanted in mice reveal functional connection with visual cortex. Nat. Commun. 13, 7945 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Schafer, S. T. et al. An in vivo neuroimmune organoid model to study human microglia phenotypes. Cell 186, 2111–2126.e20 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Luhmann, H. J. et al. Spontaneous neuronal activity in developing neocortical networks: from single cells to large-scale interactions. Front. Neural Circuits 10, 40 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, X. et al. Antisense oligonucleotide therapeutic approach for Timothy syndrome. Nature 628, 818–825 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Birey, F. et al. Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids. Nature 545, 54–59 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Miura, Y. et al. Generation of human striatal organoids and cortico-striatal assembloids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1421–1430 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Miura, Y. et al. Engineering brain assembloids to interrogate human neural circuits. Nat. Protoc. 17, 15–35 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Paxinos, G. & Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Elsevier, 2013).

  40. Matson, K. J. E. et al. Isolation of adult spinal cord nuclei for massively parallel single-nucleus RNA sequencing. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 58413 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bakken, T. E. et al. Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse. Nature 598, 111–119 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Feng, L., Zhao, T. & Kim, J. neuTube 1.0: a new design for efficient neuron reconstruction software based on the SWC format. eNeuro 2, ENEURO.0049-14.2104 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Arshadi, C., Günther, U., Eddison, M., Harrington, K. I. S. & Ferreira, T. A. SNT: a unifying toolbox for quantification of neuronal anatomy. Nat. Methods 18, 374–377 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Birey, F. & Pașca, S. P. Imaging neuronal migration and network activity in human forebrain assembloids. STAR Protoc. 3, 101478 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Pașca laboratory at Stanford University for insightful discussions and technical support. This work was supported by the Stanford Big Idea Project on Brain Organogenesis (Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute) (to S.P.P. and K.D.), the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH115012; to S.P.P.), the Kwan Funds (to S.P.P.), the Senkut Funds (to S.P.P.), the Coates Foundation (to S.P.P.), the Ludwig Family Foundation (to S.P.P.), the Alfred E. Mann Foundation (to S.P.P.), the Stanford Maternal & Child Health Research Institute (MCHRI) Postdoctoral Fellowship (to F.G. and O.R.), the Walter V. and Idun Berry Postdoctoral Fellowship (to F.G.), the NARSAD Young Investigator Award (to F.G.) and an NIH NIDA K99/R00 (K99 DA050662) (to F.G.). S.P.P. is a New York Stem Cell Foundation (NYSCF) Robertson Stem Cell Investigator, a CZI Ben Barres Investigator and a CZ BioHub Investigator. We thank the Stanford Center for Innovation in In vivo Imaging (SCi 3)—Small Animal Imaging Center, which is supported by the NIH S10 Shared Instrumentation grant (S10RR026917-01), and the Stanford Behavioral and Functional Neuroscience Laboratory, which is supported by an NIH S10 Shared Instrumentation for Animal Research grant (1S10OD030452-01).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Kevin W. Kelley, Omer Revah, Felicity Gore.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Kevin W. Kelley, Omer Revah, Felicity Gore, Konstantin Kaganovsky, Xiaoyu Chen, Karl Deisseroth & Sergiu P. Pașca

  2. Stanford Brain Organogenesis, Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Kevin W. Kelley, Omer Revah, Konstantin Kaganovsky, Xiaoyu Chen & Sergiu P. Pașca

  3. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Felicity Gore & Karl Deisseroth

Authors

  1. Kevin W. Kelley
  2. Omer Revah
  3. Felicity Gore
  4. Konstantin Kaganovsky
  5. Xiaoyu Chen
  6. Karl Deisseroth
  7. Sergiu P. Pașca

Contributions

All authors contributed to the development of the methods described in this protocol. K.W.K. and S.P.P. wrote the manuscript with input and corrections from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergiu P. Pașca.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Stanford University holds patents for the generation of cortical organoids/spheroids (listing S.P.P. as an inventor) and a provisional patent application for transplantation of organoids (listing S.P.P., O.R., F.G., K.D. and K.W.K. as inventors).

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Yanhong Shi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Revah, O. et al. Nature 610, 319–326 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05277-w

Miura, Y. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1421–1430 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-00763-w

Yoon, S.-J. et al. Nat. Methods 16, 75–78 (2019): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0255-0

Sloan, S. A. et al. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2062–2085 (2018): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0032-7

Chen, X. et al. Nature 628, 818–825 (2024): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07310-6

Extended data

Supplementary information

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelley, K.W., Revah, O., Gore, F. et al. Host circuit engagement of human cortical organoids transplanted in rodents. Nat Protoc 19, 3542–3567 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01029-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01029-4

Associated content