Data availability
Requests for de-identified data can be directed at the corresponding author (T.H., talma@tlvmc.gov.il). All requests for data sharing will be reviewed by the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center IRB committee to verify whether the request is subject to any intellectual property or confidentiality obligations. Requests will be reviewed on the basis of scientific merit, ethical review, available resources and regulatory requirements and will be responded within 90 days. After approval of a proposal, anonymized individual-level data will be made available for reuse in accordance with the signed consent IRB form. A signed data access agreement with the collaborator is required before accessing shared data.
Code availability
References
Wager, T. D. & Atlas, L. Y. The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 403–418 (2015).
Gershman, S. J. & Uchida, N. Believing in dopamine. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 703–714 (2019).
Ben-Shaanan, T. L. et al. Activation of the reward system boosts innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Med 22, 940–944 (2016).
Ben-Shaanan, T. L. et al. Modulation of anti-tumor immunity by the brain’s reward system. Nat. Commun. 9, 2723 (2018).
Kayama, T., Ikegaya, Y. & Sasaki, T. Phasic firing of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area triggers peripheral immune responses. Sci. Rep. 12, 1447 (2022).
Costi, S. et al. Peripheral immune cell reactivity and neural response to reward in patients with depression and anhedonia. Transl. Psychiatry 11, 565 (2021).
Chat, I. K.-Y. et al. Goal-striving tendencies moderate the relationship between reward-related brain function and peripheral inflammation. Brain Behav. Immun. 94, 60–70 (2021).
Treadway, M. T. et al. Association between interleukin-6 and striatal prediction-error signals following acute stress in healthy female participants. Biol. Psychiatry 82, 570–577 (2017).
Sitaram, R. et al. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 86–100 (2017).
Lubianiker, N. et al. Process-based framework for precise neuromodulation. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 436–445 (2019).
Lubianiker, N., Paret, C., Dayan, P. & Hendler, T. Neurofeedback through the lens of reinforcement learning. Trends Neurosci. 45, 579–593 (2022).
Klöbl, M. et al. Reinforcement and punishment shape the learning dynamics in fMRI neurofeedback. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 304 (2020).
Oblak, E. F., Lewis-Peacock, J. A. & Sulzer, J. S. Self-regulation strategy, feedback timing and hemodynamic properties modulate learning in a simulated fMRI neurofeedback environment. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005681 (2017).
Zoefel, B., Huster, R. J. & Herrmann, C. S. Neurofeedback training of the upper alpha frequency band in EEG improves cognitive performance. NeuroImage 54, 1427–1431 (2011).
Autenrieth, M., Kober, S. E., Neuper, C. & Wood, G. How much do strategy reports tell about the outcomes of neurofeedback training? A study on the voluntary up-regulation of the sensorimotor rhythm. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 218 (2020).
Qiu, S. et al. Significant transcriptome and cytokine changes in hepatitis B vaccine non-responders revealed by genome-wide comparative analysis. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 14, 1763–1772 (2018).
Kirschner, M. et al. Ventral striatal hypoactivation is associated with apathy but not diminished expression in patients with schizophrenia. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 41, 152–161 (2016).
Ohmann, H. A., Kuper, N. & Wacker, J. Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). PLOS ONE 17, e0262902 (2022).
Gonen, T. et al. Human mesostriatal response tracks motivational tendencies under naturalistic goal conflict. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 961–972 (2016).
Munshi, S. & Rosenkranz, J. A. Effects of peripheral immune challenge on in vivo firing of basolateral amygdala neurons in adult male rats. Neuroscience 390, 174–186 (2018).
Zhu, X. et al. Somatosensory cortex and central amygdala regulate neuropathic pain-mediated peripheral immune response via vagal projections to the spleen. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 471–483 (2024).
Boukezzi, S. et al. Exaggerated amygdala response to threat and association with immune hyperactivity in depression. Brain, Behav., Immun. 104, 205–212 (2022).
Yin, L. et al. Inflammation and decreased functional connectivity in a widely-distributed network in depression: Centralized effects in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex. Brain Behav. Immun. 80, 657–666 (2019).
Hui, M. & Beier, K. T. Defining the interconnectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral midbrain. Front. Mol. 15, 971349 (2022).
Jennings, J. H. et al. Distinct extended amygdala circuits for divergent motivational states. Nature 496, 224–228 (2013).
Glimcher, P. W. Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 15647–15654 (2011).
Lerner, T. N., Holloway, A. L. & Seiler, J. L. Dopamine, updated: reward prediction error and beyond. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 67, 123–130 (2021).
Niv, Y. Cost, benefit, tonic, phasic. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1104, 357–376 (2007).
Beeler, J. A. Tonic dopamine modulates exploitation of reward learning. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 170 (2010).
Niv, Y., Daw, N. D., Joel, D. & Dayan, P. Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor. Psychopharmacology 191, 507–520 (2007).
Hahn, A. et al. Functional dynamics of dopamine synthesis during monetary reward and punishment processing. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 41, 2973–2985 (2021).
Schmidt, *Clemens et al. Multimodal assessment of dopamine synthesis and bold- signaling in reward and punishment processing - a hybrid fpet/fmri study. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 28, i39–i40 (2025).
Fields, H. L. & Margolis, E. B. Understanding opioid reward. Trends Neurosci. 38, 217–225 (2015).
Laurent, V., Morse, A. K. & Balleine, B. W. The role of opioid processes in reward and decision-making. Br. J. Pharmacol. 172, 449–459 (2015).
Bossong, M. G., Wilson, R., Appiah-Kusi, E., McGuire, P. & Bhattacharyya, S. Human striatal response to reward anticipation linked to hippocampal glutamate levels. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 21, 623–630 (2018).
Benedetti, F. & Amanzio, M. Mechanisms of the placebo response. Pulm. Pharmacol. Therapeutics 26, 520–523 (2013).
Zubieta, J.-K. & Stohler, C. S. Neurobiological mechanisms of placebo responses. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1156, 198–210 (2009).
MacInnes, J. J., Dickerson, K. C., Chen, N. & Adcock, R. A. Cognitive neurostimulation: learning to volitionally sustain ventral tegmental area activation. Neuron 89, 1331–1342 (2016).
Totah, N. K. B., Kim, Y. & Moghaddam, B. Distinct prestimulus and poststimulus activation of VTA neurons correlates with stimulus detection. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 75–85 (2013).
Howe, M. W., Tierney, P. L., Sandberg, S. G., Phillips, P. E. M. & Graybiel, A. M. Prolonged dopamine signalling in striatum signals proximity and value of distant rewards. Nature 500, 575–579 (2013).
Kahn, I. & Shohamy, D. Intrinsic connectivity between the hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, and ventral tegmental area in humans. Hippocampus 23, 187–192 (2013).
Cauda, F. et al. Functional connectivity and coactivation of the nucleus accumbens: a combined functional connectivity and structure-based meta-analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 2864–2877 (2011).
Hammes, J. et al. Dopamine metabolism of the nucleus accumbens and fronto-striatal connectivity modulate impulse control. Brain 142, 733–743 (2019).
Zunhammer, M., Gerardi, M. & Bingel, U. The effect of dopamine on conditioned placebo analgesia in healthy individuals: a double-blind randomized trial. Psychopharmacology 235, 2587–2595 (2018).
Kunkel, A. et al. Dopamine has no direct causal role in the formation of treatment expectations and placebo analgesia in humans. PLOS Biol. 22, e3002772 (2024).
Lange, T., Dimitrov, S., Bollinger, T., Diekelmann, S. & Born, J. Sleep after vaccination boosts immunological memory. J. Immunol. 187, 283–290 (2011).
Yu, X. et al. GABA and glutamate neurons in the VTA regulate sleep and wakefulness. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 106–119 (2019).
Schiller, M., Ben-Shaanan, T. L. & Rolls, A. Neuronal regulation of immunity: why, how and where? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 20–36 (2021).
Castro, D. C. & Bruchas, M. R. A motivational and neuropeptidergic hub: anatomical and functional diversity within the nucleus accumbens shell. Neuron 102, 529–552 (2019).
van Dongen, Y. C. et al. Anatomical evidence for direct connections between the shell and core subregions of the rat nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience 136, 1049–1071 (2005).
Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R. & Svrakic, D. M. The tridimensional personality questionnaire: U.S. normative data. Psychol. Rep. 69, 1047–1057 (1991).
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychol. Assess. 4, 5 (1992).
Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Moltó, J. & Caseras, X. The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personal. Individ. differences 31, 837–862 (2001).
Treadway, M. T., Buckholtz, J. W., Schwartzman, A. N., Lambert, W. E. & Zald, D. H. Worth the ‘EEfRT’? The effort expenditure for rewards task as an objective measure of motivation and anhedonia. PloS one 4, e6598 (2009).
Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E. & Hommer, D. FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage 12, 20–27 (2000).
Kirschner, M. et al. Deficits in context-dependent adaptive coding of reward in schizophrenia. npj Schizophr. 2, 16020 (2016).
Murty, V. P. et al. Resting state networks distinguish human ventral tegmental area from substantia nigra. Neuroimage 100, 580–589 (2014).
Koush, Y. et al. OpenNFT: an open-source Python/Matlab framework for real-time fMRI neurofeedback training based on activity, connectivity and multivariate pattern analysis. NeuroImage 156, 489–503 (2017).
Lindquist, M. A. The statistical analysis of fMRI data. Statist. Sci. 23, (2008).
Hinds, O. et al. Computing moment-to-moment BOLD activation for real-time neurofeedback. NeuroImage 54, 361–368 (2011).
Koush, Y., Zvyagintsev, M., Dyck, M., Mathiak, K. A. & Mathiak, K. Signal quality and Bayesian signal processing in neurofeedback based on real-time fMRI. NeuroImage 59, 478–489 (2012).
Bagarinao, E., Matsuo, K., Nakai, T. & Sato, S. Estimation of general linear model coefficients for real-time application. NeuroImage 19, 422–429 (2003).
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. SAGE Handb. Personal. Theory Assess. 1, 273–294 (2008).
Esteban, O. et al. fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat. Methods 16, 111–116 (2019).
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E., Woolrich, M. W. & Smith, S. M. Fsl. Neuroimage 62, 782–790 (2012).
Oldham, S. et al. The anticipation and outcome phases of reward and loss processing: a neuroimaging meta-analysis of the monetary incentive delay task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 3398–3418 (2018).
Woolrich, M. Robust group analysis using outlier inference. NeuroImage 41, 286–301 (2008).
Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M. & Smith, S. M. General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in fMRI. NeuroImage 20, 1052–1063 (2003).
Woolrich, M. W., Behrens, T. E. J., Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M. & Smith, S. M. Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. NeuroImage 21, 1732–1747 (2004).
R Core Team, R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
Chikhi, S., Matton, N., Sanna, M. & Blanchet, S. Mental strategies and resting state EEG: effect on high alpha amplitude modulation by neurofeedback in healthy young adults. Biol. Psychol. 178, 108521 (2023).
Kober, S., Witte, M., Ninaus, M., Neuper, C. & Wood, G. Learning to modulate one’s own brain activity: the effect of spontaneous mental strategies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 695 (2013).
McLaren, D. G., Ries, M. L., Xu, G. & Johnson, S. C. A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches. NeuroImage 61, 1277–1286 (2012).
Sescousse, G., Caldú, X., Segura, B. & Dreher, J.-C. Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 681–696 (2013).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Kühn, S. & Gallinat, J. Segregating cognitive functions within hippocampal formation: a quantitative meta-analysis on spatial navigation and episodic memory. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 1129–1142 (2014).
Arsalidou, M. & Taylor, M. J. Is 2 + 2 = 4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. NeuroImage 54, 2382–2393 (2011).
Hétu, S. et al. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 930–949 (2013).
McNorgan, C. A meta-analytic review of multisensory imagery identifies the neural correlates of modality-specific and modality-general imagery. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 285 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by Joy Ventures foundation and by KAMIN program in the Israeli ministry of innovation (grant 2029678; A.R. and T.H.) and Teva Bio-Innovation Forum (N.L.). A.R. would like to thank the AMRF Adelson Family Foundation support. We thank Y. Benjamini for his statistical advice, N. Noy for her assistance in creating the graphical illustrations depicted in Fig. 1, A. Kuzli and M. Szwarcwort for their assistance in measuring plasma antibody titers, S. Schwartzbaum for her help with editing, and R. Cohen for his inspiration and encouragement for pursuing this animal-to-human translation effort.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
T.H. is the Chief Medical Scientist and Chair of the advisory board in GrayMatters Health. T.H., A.R., N.L. and T.K. have a filed patent related to the topic of this paper in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (application number: 17/435.906; Title of Invention: Neurofeedback and Induction of an Immune Response). The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Medicine thanks Ulrike Bingel, Marta Peciña and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Jerome Staal, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Offline functional localization of the reward mesolimbic network. a. Reward anticipation contrast map.
Whole-brain results for the high vs neutral reward anticipation contrast during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task. The overlaid predefined meta-analytic masks of the mesolimbic system, taken from refs. 57,66, are shown in white. Abbreviations: Nucleus Accumbens (Nac); Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA). Statistical threshold was set at a cluster-level p(FWE) < .05. b. ROIs of the reward mesolimbic network. The offline functional localization of the reward mesolimbic regions. For the VTA, the predefined anatomical mask57 was intersected with the high>neutral reward anticipation maps presented in A. For the bilateral Nac, a 5 mm sphere was created around the peak activation voxel within the 8 mm predefined Nac masks (defined based on reward anticipation meta-analysis66).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Randomized Network control condition.
a. Conceptual scheme. In randomized ROI-NF, each participant is randomly assigned to one of K subgroups of different functionally defined neural targets (colored in pink, orange, and yellow). While in each sub-group, a specific neural target is modulated along with the general task processes (colored in green – control, learning and reward processes), group-level modulations (right panel) include only the averaged (non-specific) general processes common to all subgroups (that is the target process specific to each subgroup is averaged over the whole group). Conversely, in a typical experimental NF group, all participants modulate both the general and target processes (colored in green and blue, respectively). Therefore, group-level modulations include both the general processes and the reoccurring target process modulations. Consequently, differences in outcome effects (such as immune function) between groups can be attributed solely to the target-specific effects (Figure adapted from ref. 10). b. Neural networks of subgroups. Targets of the randomized ROI-NF control condition. All target networks were selected from meta-analyses of fMRI studies on specific functional processes. MNI coordinates: T1. Spatial navigation network76: right medial temporal lobe: 26, -35, -11; left medial temporal lobe: -26, -47, -9; left posterior cingulate: -15, -59, 19; T2. Arithmetic processing network77: right SPL: 29, -66, 49; left dlpfc: -45, 32, 29; left precuneus: -28, -71, 33; T3; Motor imagery network78: right cerebellum: 32, -62, -28; left cerebellum: -32, -56, -30; left precentral gyrus: -26, -2, 58; T4. Auditory imagery network79: right STG:64, -30, 9; left IFG: -48, 24, −5; left precentral gyrus: -52 1 47.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Mental Strategies Questionnaire for Neurofeedback (MSQ-NF).
Following practice, participants fill out the MSQ-NF for each strategy applied during the session, based on their logged choices during training. “Other” strategies, as well as those with predefined names, are verbally described, and then each strategy is labeled across the MSQ space.
Extended Data Fig. 4 BOLD activity during the last NF session across conditions and groups.
a. Upregulate>Rest contrast, showing differing regulation effects per group (reward ml NF – light blue, randomized ROI NF – pink). b. Feedback contrast. c. Choice contrast. Abbreviations: right Insula (r Ins); subgenual ACC (sgACC); Thalamus (Thal), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmpfc). The VTA and bilateral Nac ROIs are overlaid in white.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lubianiker, N., Koren, T., Djerasi, M. et al. Upregulation of reward mesolimbic activity and immune response to vaccination: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med 32, 572–581 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04140-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04140-5