Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. P. Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing (The MIT Press, 1994).
Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Am. Psychol. 34, 906–911 (1979). This paper introduced metacognition as a distinct psychological construct, setting the agenda for research on its cognitive and neural basis. Flavell’s distinction between metacognitive knowledge and experience is a forerunner of global and local aspects of metacognition.
Kepecs, A. & Mainen, Z. F. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 1322–1337 (2012). This review sets out a normative computational framework for behavioural signatures of confidence, allowing metacognition to be quantified and studied using both explicit and implicit measures in humans and non-human animals.
Smith, J. D. The study of animal metacognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 389–396 (2009).
Rahnev, D. Visual metacognition: measures, models, and neural correlates. The Am. Psychol. 76, 1445–1453 (2021).
Mazancieux, A. et al. Towards a common conceptual space for metacognition in perception and memory. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 751–766 (2023).
Fleming, S. M. Metacognition and confidence: a review and synthesis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 75, 241–268 (2024).
Goris, R. L., Fu, Z. & Fetsch, C. R. Computational and neuronal basis of visual confidence. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 11, 385–410 (2025).
Mamassian, P. Visual confidence. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 2, 459–481 (2016).
Nelson, T. O. & Narens, L. Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. Adv. Res. Theory 26, 125–173 (1990). This foundational paper formulates a distinction between meta and object levels of cognition and articulates relationships between metacognitive monitoring and control — a framework that continues to organize the field.
Pouget, A., Drugowitsch, J. & Kepecs, A. Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 366–374 (2016). This computational perspective distinguishes world-directed uncertainty from self-directed confidence, arguing that the two serve different behavioural goals.
Meyniel, F., Sigman, M. & Mainen, Z. F. Confidence as Bayesian probability: from neural origins to behavior. Neuron. 88, 78–92 (2015).
Mamassian, P. Confidence forced-choice and other metaperceptual tasks. Perception 49, 616–635 (2020).
Mamassian, P. & de Gardelle, V. Modeling perceptual confidence and the confidence forced-choice paradigm. Psychol. Rev. 129, 976–998 (2022).
Carruthers, P. & Williams, D. M. Model-free metacognition. Cognition 225, 105117 (2022).
Kiani, R. & Shadlen, M. N. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324, 759–764 (2009). This paper showed that monkeys will decline a difficult perceptual decision in favour of a guaranteed smaller reward, and that firing rates linked to EA in the lateral intraparietal cortex also predict the opt-out decision.
Goupil, L. & Kouider, S. Behavioral and neural indices of metacognitive sensitivity in preverbal infants. Curr. Biol. 26, 3038–3045 (2016).
Sanders, J. I., Hangya, B. & Kepecs, A. Signatures of a statistical computation in the human sense of confidence. Neuron. 90, 499–506 (2016).
Fleming, S. M. & Lau, H. C. How to measure metacognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 443 (2014). This tutorial review distinguishes between metacognitive bias, sensitivity and efficiency, and sets out why interpreting findings in the neuroscience of metacognition requires measures of sensitivity to be corrected for first-order performance.
Maniscalco, B. & Lau, H. C. A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 422–430 (2012). This paper introduced meta-d’, a signal detection theoretic measure that expresses metacognitive sensitivity on the same scale as first-order sensitivity and which has become a standard tool for the field.
Shimamura, A. P. & Squire, L. R. Memory and metamemory: a study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 12, 452 (1986).
Pannu, J. & Kaszniak, A. Metamemory experiments in neurological populations: a review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 15, 105–130 (2005).
Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Nagy, Z., Dolan, R. J. & Rees, G. Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 329, 1541–1543 (2010).
McCurdy, L. Y. et al. Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception. J. Neurosci. 33, 1897–1906 (2013).
Fandakova, Y. et al. Changes in ventromedial prefrontal and insular cortex support the development of metamemory from childhood into adolescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7582–7587 (2017).
Fleming, S. M., Huijgen, J. & Dolan, R. J. Prefrontal contributions to metacognition in perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 32, 6117–6125 (2012).
Yokoyama, O. et al. Right frontopolar cortex activity correlates with reliability of retrospective rating of confidence in short-term recognition memory performance. Neurosci. Res. 68, 199–206 (2010).
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Gorgolewski, K. J. & Margulies, D. S. Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. J. Neurosci. 33, 16657–16665 (2013).
De Martino, B., Fleming, S. M., Garrett, N. & Dolan, R. J. Confidence in value-based choice. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 105–110 (2013).
Zheng, Y. et al. Diffusion property and functional connectivity of superior longitudinal fasciculus underpin human metacognition. Neuropsychologia. 156, 107847 (2021).
Moses-Payne, M. E., Habicht, J., Bowler, A., Steinbeis, N. & Hauser, T. U. I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice. Dev. Sci. 24, e13101 (2021).
Weil, L. G. et al. The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 264–271 (2013).
Hertzog, C., Sinclair, S. M. & Dunlosky, J. Age differences in the monitoring of learning: cross-sectional evidence of spared resolution across the adult life span. Dev. Psychol. 46, 939 (2010).
McWilliams, A., Bibby, H., Steinbeis, N., David, A. S. & Fleming, S. M. Age-related decreases in global metacognition are independent of local metacognition and task performance. Cognition 235, 105389 (2023).
Qiu, L. et al. The neural system of metacognition accompanying decision-making in the prefrontal cortex. PLoS Biol. 16, e2004037 (2018).
Yeon, J., Shekhar, M. & Rahnev, D. Overlapping and unique neural circuits are activated during perceptual decision making and confidence. Sci. Rep. 10, 20761 (2020).
Middlebrooks, P. G. & Sommer, M. A. Neuronal correlates of metacognition in primate frontal cortex. Neuron. 75, 517–530 (2012).
Miyamoto, K., Setsuie, R., Osada, T. & Miyashita, Y. Reversible silencing of the frontopolar cortex selectively impairs metacognitive judgment on non-experience in primates. Neuron. 97, 980–989.e6 (2018).
Henson, R., Rugg, M., Shallice, T. & Dolan, R. J. Confidence in recognition memory for words: dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 913–923 (2000).
Vaccaro, A. G. & Fleming, S. M. Thinking about thinking: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 2, 2398212818810591 (2018).
Kepecs, A., Uchida, N., Zariwala, H. & Mainen, Z. Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 455, 227–231 (2008). This paper pioneered single-neuron correlates of decision confidence, showing that firing in the rodent orbitofrontal cortex during odour categorisation follows the folded-X pattern predicted by statistical models.
Lak, A. et al. Orbitofrontal cortex is required for optimal waiting based on decision confidence. Neuron. 84, 190–201 (2014). This paper provided causal evidence that the rodent orbitofrontal cortex is required for metacognition, with inactivation abolishing confidence-dependent waiting for reward while leaving decision accuracy intact.
Stolyarova, A. et al. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex and basolateral amygdala to decision confidence and learning under uncertainty. Nat. Commun. 10, 4704 (2019).
Fleming, S. M., Ryu, J., Golfinos, J. G. & Blackmon, K. E. Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions. Brain 137, 2811–2822 (2014).
Kwok, S. C., Cai, Y. & Buckley, M. J. Mnemonic introspection in macaques is dependent on superior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex but not orbitofrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 39, 5922–5934 (2019).
Miyamoto, K. et al. Causal neural network of metamemory for retrospection in primates. Science 355, 188–193 (2017).
Shekhar, M. & Rahnev, D. Distinguishing the roles of dorsolateral and anterior PFC in visual metacognition. J. Neurosci. 38, 5078–5087 (2018). This paper highlighted how different prefrontal subregions support different computational components of visual metacognition, with dorsolateral PFC TMS altering confidence level and anterior PFC TMS altering metacognitive efficiency.
Ramnani, N. & Owen, A. M. Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 184–194 (2004).
Lebreton, M., Abitbol, R., Daunizeau, J. & Pessiglione, M. Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1159–1167 (2015).
Peters, M. A. Introspective psychophysics for the study of subjective experience. Cereb. Cortex 35, 49–57 (2025).
Fleming, S. M. & Daw, N. D. Self-evaluation of decision-making: a general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychol. Rev. 124, 91–114 (2017). This paper introduced a Bayesian framework for metacognition, bringing together the literatures on error-monitoring and confidence and providing a taxonomy for first-order, serial, parallel and hierarchical architectures that can be used to organize computational accounts of confidence.
Urai, A. E., Braun, A. & Donner, T. H. Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias. Nat. Commun. 8, 14637 (2017).
Masset, P., Ott, T., Lak, A., Hirokawa, J. & Kepecs, A. Behavior- and modality-general representation of confidence in orbitofrontal cortex. Cell 182, 112–126.e18 (2020). This paper showed that confidence signals in the rodent orbitofrontal cortex generalize across sensory modalities and behavioural readouts, providing evidence for a common currency.
Rausch, M., Hellmann, S. & Zehetleitner, M. Confidence in masked orientation judgments is informed by both evidence and visibility. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 80, 134–154 (2018).
Xue, K., Fung, H. & Rahnev, D. Stimulus reliability but not boundary distance manipulations violate the folded-X pattern of confidence. Cognition 272, 106490 (2026).
Boundy-Singer, Z. M., Ziemba, C. M. & Goris, R. L. T. Confidence reflects a noisy decision reliability estimate. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 142–154 (2023). This paper introduced the CASANDRE model, in which confidence reflects a noisy estimate of decision reliability and meta-uncertainty (uncertainty about one’s own cognitive and perceptual performance) acts as a limit on metacognitive performance.
Plate, C. R. et al. Computational characterization of metacognitive ability in subjective decision-making. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.23.655775 (2025).
Boundy-Singer, Z. M., Ziemba, C. M. & Goris, R. L. Sensory population activity reveals downstream confidence computations in the primate visual system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2426441122 (2025).
Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535–574 (2007).
Vickers, D. Decision Processes in Visual Perception (Academic Press, 1979).
Pleskac, T. J. & Busemeyer, J. R. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychol. Rev. 117, 864–901 (2010).
Moran, R., Teodorescu, A. R. & Usher, M. Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account. Cogn. Psychol. 78, 99–147 (2015).
Hellmann, S., Zehetleitner, M. & Rausch, M. Simultaneous modeling of choice, confidence, and response time in visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 130, 1521 (2023).
Vivar-Lazo, M. & Fetsch, C. R. Neural basis of concurrent deliberation toward a choice and confidence judgment. Nat. Neurosci. 29, 159–17 (2025). This paper used peri-decision wagering in monkeys to show that choice and confidence are deliberated concurrently rather than sequentially, with decodable signals for both emerging together in the lateral intraparietal cortex.
Grogan, J. P., Rys, W., Kelly, S. P. & O’Connell, R. G. Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics. Imaging Neurosci. 1, 1–23 (2023).
Dou, W. et al. Neural signatures of evidence accumulation encode subjective perceptual confidence independent of performance. Psychol. Sci. 35, 760–779 (2024).
Komura, Y., Nikkuni, A., Hirashima, N., Uetake, T. & Miyamoto, A. Responses of pulvinar neurons reflect a subject’s confidence in visual categorization. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 749–755 (2013).
Rollwage, M. et al. Confidence drives a neural confirmation bias. Nat. Commun. 11, 2634 (2020).
Charles, L., Van Opstal, F., Marti, S. & Dehaene, S. Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection. NeuroImage. 73, 80–94 (2013).
Rabbitt, P. Error correction time without external error signals. Nature 212, 438–438 (1966).
Yeung, N. & Summerfield, C. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 367, 1310–1321 (2012).
Balsdon, T., Wyart, V. & Mamassian, P. Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation. Nat. Commun. 11, 1753 (2020).
Dotan, D., Meyniel, F. & Dehaene, S. On-line confidence monitoring during decision making. Cognition 171, 112–121 (2018).
Desender, K., Ridderinkhof, K. R. & Murphy, P. R. Understanding neural signals of post-decisional performance monitoring: An integrative review. eLife 10, e67556 (2021). This integrative review unifies distinct literatures on performance monitoring, relating error monitoring to confidence formation through the lens of post-decisional processing.
Sajad, A., Godlove, D. C. & Schall, J. D. Cortical microcircuitry of performance monitoring. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 265–274 (2019).
Fu, Z. et al. Single-neuron correlates of error monitoring and post-error adjustments in human medial frontal cortex. Neuron 101, 165–177 (2019).
Fu, Z., Sajad, A., Errington, S. P., Schall, J. D. & Rutishauser, U. Neurophysiological mechanisms of error monitoring in human and non-human primates. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 153–172 (2023).
Kirschner, H., Humann, J., Derrfuss, J., Danielmeier, C. & Ullsperger, M. Neural and behavioral traces of error awareness. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 21, 573–591 (2021).
Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blom, J., Band, G. P. & Kok, A. Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: Evidence from an antisaccade task. Psychophysiology 38, 752–760 (2001).
Ullsperger, M., Harsay, H. A., Wessel, J. R. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 629–643 (2010).
Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., Harty, S. & O’Connell, R. G. Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments. eLife 4, 3478 (2015).
Boldt, A. & Yeung, N. Shared neural markers of decision confidence and error detection. J. Neurosci. 35, 3478–3484 (2015).
Fleming, S. M., van der Putten, E. J. & Daw, N. D. Neural mediators of changes of mind about perceptual decisions. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 617–624 (2018).
Walker, E. Y. et al. Studying the neural representations of uncertainty. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1857–1867 (2023).
Obleser, J. Metacognition in the listening brain. Trends Neurosci. 48, 100–112 (2025).
Geurts, L. S., Cooke, J. R. H., van Bergen, R. S. & Jehee, J. F. M. Subjective confidence reflects representation of Bayesian probability in cortex. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 294–305 (2022). This paper decoded trial-by-trial sensory uncertainty from human visual cortex and showed that reported confidence tracks this readout in PFC, linking variability in sensory uncertainty to the formation of propositional confidence.
Webb, T. W., Miyoshi, K., So, T. Y., Rajananda, S. & Lau, H. Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases. Nat. Commun. 14, 3992 (2023).
Bang, D. & Fleming, S. M. Distinct encoding of decision confidence in human medial prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6082–6087 (2018).
Ning, C., Fu, G., Zhang, Y.-Y., Meyniel, F. & Wang, L. Macaque prefrontal cortex integrates multiple components for metacognitive judgments of working memory. Neuron 114, 938–951 (2026).
Li, H.-H., Sprague, T. C., Yoo, A. H., Ma, W. J. & Curtis, C. E. Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex. Neuron 109, 3699–3712.e6 (2021).
Trommershauser, J., Maloney, L. T. & Landy, M. S. Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 291–297 (2008).
Arbuzova, P. et al. Measuring metacognition of direct and indirect parameters of voluntary movement. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150, 2208 (2021).
Charalampaki, A. et al. Motor outcomes congruent with intentions may sharpen metacognitive representations. Cognition 235, 105388 (2023).
Torrecillos, F., Albouy, P., Brochier, T. & Malfait, N. Does the processing of sensory and reward-prediction errors involve common neural resources? Evidence from a frontocentral negative potential modulated by movement execution errors. J. Neurosci. 34, 4845–4856 (2014).
Goupil, L. & Aucouturier, J.-J. Distinct signatures of subjective confidence and objective accuracy in speech prosody. Cognition 212, 104661 (2021).
Palser, E., Fotopoulou, A. & Kilner, J. Altering movement parameters disrupts metacognitive accuracy. Conscious. Cogn. 57, 33–40 (2018).
Kiani, R., Corthell, L. & Shadlen, M. N. Choice certainty is informed by both evidence and decision time. Neuron. 84, 1329–1342 (2014).
Wokke, M. E., Achoui, D. & Cleeremans, A. Action information contributes to metacognitive decision-making. Sci. Rep. 10, 3632 (2020).
Pereira, M. et al. Disentangling the origins of confidence in speeded perceptual judgments through multimodal imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 8382–8390 (2020).
Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B. & Wierzchoń, M. But I was so sure! Metacognitive judgments are less accurate given prospectively than retrospectively. Front. Psychol. 7, 218 (2016).
Seow, T. X. F., Rouault, M., Gillan, C. M. & Fleming, S. M. How local and global metacognition shape mental health. Biol. Psychiatry 90, 436–446 (2021). This review proposes that metacognition operates over both local and global timescales, and harnesses this distinction to organise findings on metacognitive disturbance in a range of psychiatric conditions.
Rahnev, D., Koizumi, A., McCurdy, L. Y., D’Esposito, M. & Lau, H. Confidence leak in perceptual decision making. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1664–1680 (2015).
Rouault, M., Dayan, P. & Fleming, S. M. Forming global estimates of self-performance from local confidence. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019).
Lee, A. L. F., de Gardelle, V. & Mamassian, P. Global visual confidence. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28, 1233–1242 (2021).
Hoogervorst, K., Banellis, L. & Allen, M. G. Domain-specific updating of metacognitive self-beliefs. Cognition 254, 105965 (2025).
Rouault, M. & Fleming, S. M. Formation of global self-beliefs in the human brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 27268–27276 (2020).
Yon, D. & Frith, C. D. Precision and the Bayesian brain. Curr. Biol. 31, R1026–R1032 (2021).
Wöstmann, M., Waschke, L. & Obleser, J. Prestimulus neural alpha power predicts confidence in discriminating identical auditory stimuli. European J. Neurosci. 49, 94–105 (2019).
Samaha, J., Iemi, L. & Postle, B. R. Prestimulus alpha-band power biases visual discrimination confidence, but not accuracy. Conscious. Cogn. 54, 47–55 (2017).
Hu, X. et al. A Bayesian inference model for metamemory. Psychol. Rev. 128, 824–855 (2021).
Van Marcke, H., Le Denmat, P., Verguts, T. & Desender, K. Manipulating prior beliefs causally induces under-and overconfidence. Psychol. Sci. 35, 358–375 (2024).
Heyes, C., Bang, D., Shea, N., Frith, C. D. & Fleming, S. M. Knowing ourselves together: the cultural origins of metacognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 349–362 (2020).
Mazor, M. Inference about absence as a window into the mental self-model. Open Mind 9, 635–651 (2025).
Morales, J., Lau, H. & Fleming, S. M. Domain-general and domain-specific patterns of activity supporting metacognition in human prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 38, 3534–3546 (2018).
Miyamoto, K. et al. Brain activity, disruption and connectivity comparisons identify origins of human metacognition in other primates. Nat. Hum. Behav. 10, 1557–1578 (2026). This paper compared humans and monkeys performing the same prospective confidence task, revealing that the two species track self-performance using different neural architectures within the PFC.
Miyamoto, K. et al. Identification and disruption of a neural mechanism for accumulating prospective metacognitive information prior to decision-making. Neuron. 109, 1396–1408 (2021).
Fleming, S. M. & Michel, M. Sensory horizons and the functions of conscious vision. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 1–53 (2025).
van den Berg, R., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M. N. & Wolpert, D. M. Confidence is the bridge between multi-stage decisions. Curr. Biol. 26, 3157–3168 (2016).
Desender, K., Boldt, A. & Yeung, N. Subjective confidence predicts information seeking in decision making. Psychol. Sci. 29, 761–778 (2018).
Schulz, L., Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J. & Fleming, S. M. Dogmatism manifests in lowered information search under uncertainty. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31527–31534 (2020).
Cohanpour, M., Aly, M. & Gottlieb, J. Neural representations of sensory uncertainty and confidence are associated with perceptual curiosity. J. Neurosci. 44, e0974232024 (2024).
Balsdon, T. & Philiastides, M. G. Confidence control for efficient behaviour in dynamic environments. Nat. Commun. 15, 9089 (2024).
Guggenmos, M., Wilbertz, G., Hebart, M. N. & Sterzer, P. Mesolimbic confidence signals guide perceptual learning in the absence of external feedback. eLife 5, 345 (2016).
Metcalfe, J. Learning from errors. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 465–489 (2017).
Lak, A., Nomoto, K., Keramati, M., Sakagami, M. & Kepecs, A. Midbrain dopamine neurons signal belief in choice accuracy during a perceptual decision. Curr. Biol. 27, 821–832 (2017).
Sarafyazd, M. & Jazayeri, M. Hierarchical reasoning by neural circuits in the frontal cortex. Science 364, eaav8911 (2019).
de Gardelle, V. & Mamassian, P. Does confidence use a common currency across two visual tasks? Psychol. Sci. 25, 1286–1288 (2014).
Fu, Z. et al. The geometry of domain-general performance monitoring in the human medial frontal cortex. Science 376, eabm9922 (2022).
Donoso, M., Collins, A. G. & Koechlin, E. Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex. Science 344, 1481–1486 (2014).
Lee, S. W., Shimojo, S. & O’Doherty, J. P. Neural computations underlying arbitration between model-based and model-free learning. Neuron 81, 687–699 (2014).
Stephan, K. E. et al. Allostatic self-efficacy: A metacognitive theory of dyshomeostasis-induced fatigue and depression. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 550 (2016).
Bahrami, B. et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science 329, 1081–1085 (2010).
Hertz, U. et al. Neural computations underpinning the strategic management of influence in advice giving. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–12 (2017).
Pescetelli, N. & Yeung, N. The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150, 507 (2021).
Bang, D., Ershadmanesh, S., Nili, H. & Fleming, S. M. Private–public mappings in human prefrontal cortex. eLife 9, e56477 (2020).
Gherman, S. & Philiastides, M. Human VMPFC encodes early signatures of confidence in perceptual decisions. eLife 7, e38293 (2018).
Bang, D., Moran, R., Daw, N. D. & Fleming, S. M. Neurocomputational mechanisms of confidence in self and others. Nat. Commun. 13, 4238 (2022).
Jiang, S., Wang, S. & Wan, X. Metacognition and mentalizing are associated with distinct neural representations of decision uncertainty. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001301 (2022).
Miyamoto, K. et al. Asymmetric projection of introspection reveals a behavioural and neural mechanism for interindividual social coordination. Nat. Commun. 16, 295 (2025).
Seow, T. X., Jelinek, L., Moritz, S. & Hauser, T. U. Integrating cognitive neuroscience and clinical perspectives on metacognitive mechanisms in psychopathology. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 5, 9–28 (2025).
Hermans, D. et al. Cognitive confidence in obsessive-compulsive disorder: distrusting perception, attention and memory. Behav. Res. Ther. 46, 98–113 (2008).
Moritz, S., Woodward, T. & Ruff, C. Source monitoring and memory confidence in schizophrenia. Psychol. Med. 33, 131–139 (2003).
David, A. S., Bedford, N., Wiffen, B. & Gilleen, J. Failures of metacognition and lack of insight in neuropsychiatric disorders. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 1379–1390 (2012).
Wise, T., Robinson, O. J. & Gillan, C. M. Identifying transdiagnostic mechanisms in mental health using computational factor modeling. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 690–703 (2023).
Fox, C. A. et al. An observational treatment study of metacognition in anxious-depression. eLife 12, RP87193 (2023).
Rouault, M., Seow, T., Gillan, C. M. & Fleming, S. M. Psychiatric symptom dimensions are associated with dissociable shifts in metacognition but not task performance. Biol. Psychiatry 84, 443–451 (2018).
Hoven, M., Luigjes, J., Denys, D., Rouault, M. & van Holst, R. J. How do confidence and self-beliefs relate in psychopathology: a transdiagnostic approach. Nature Mental Health 1, 337–345 (2023).
Katyal, S., Huys, Q. J., Dolan, R. J. & Fleming, S. M. Distorted learning from local metacognition supports transdiagnostic underconfidence. Nat. Commun. 16, 1854 (2025).
Seow, T. X., Fleming, S. M. & Hauser, T. U. Metacognitive biases in anxiety-depression and compulsivity extend across perception and memory. PLoS Ment. Health. 2, e0000259 (2025).
Sarna, N., Dar, R. & Mazor, M. Biased and inattentive responding contribute to apparent metacognitive biases in mental health. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 123, e2520832123 (2026).
Gillan, C. M., Fleming, S. M., Rouault, M. & Seow, T. X. F. Metacognitive biases in mental health are not explained away by acquiescence and inattention. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k5ab6_v1 (2025).
Mograbi, D. C. & Morris, R. G. Anosognosia. Cortex 103, 385–386 (2018).
Munoz-Neira, C., Tedde, A., Coulthard, E., Thai, N. J. & Pennington, C. Neural correlates of altered insight in frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review. NeuroImage: Clin. 24, 102066 (2019).
Michel, M., Gao, Y., Mazor, M., Kletenik, I. & Rahnev, D. When visual metacognition fails: widespread anosognosia for visual deficits. Trends Cogn. Sci. 28, 1066–1077 (2024).
Vannini, P. et al. Decreased meta-memory is associated with early tauopathy in cognitively unimpaired older adults. NeuroImage: Clin. 24, 102097 (2019).
Moeller, S. J. et al. Neural correlates of metacognition impairment in opioid addiction. Biol. Psychiatry: Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 9, 1211–1221 (2024).
Cosentino, S. Metacognition in Alzheimer’s disease. In The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition (eds Fleming, S. M. & Frith, C. D.) 389–407 (Springer, 2014).
Sadnicka, A., Strudwick, A.-M., Grogan, J. P., Manohar, S. & Nielsen, G. Going ‘meta’: a systematic review of metacognition and functional neurological disorder. Brain Commun. 7, fcaf014 (2025).
Carpenter, J. et al. Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148, 51–64 (2019).
Haddara, N. & Rahnev, D. The impact of feedback on perceptual decision-making and metacognition: Reduction in bias but no change in sensitivity. Psychol. Sci. 33, 259–275 (2022).
Rouy, M. et al. Metacognitive improvement: disentangling adaptive training from experimental confounds. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151, 2083–2091 (2022).
Moritz, S., Menon, M., Balzan, R. & Woodward, T. S. Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT): past, present, and future. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 273, 811–817 (2023).
Baird, B., Mrazek, M. D., Phillips, D. T. & Schooler, J. W. Domain-specific enhancement of metacognitive ability following meditation training. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 1972–1979 (2014).
Cortese, A., Amano, K., Koizumi, A., Kawato, M. & Lau, H. C. Multivoxel neurofeedback selectively modulates confidence without changing perceptual performance. Nat. Commun. 7, 13669 (2016).
Ryals, A. J., Rogers, L. M., Gross, E. Z., Polnaszek, K. L. & Voss, J. L. Associative recognition memory awareness improved by theta-burst stimulation of frontopolar cortex. Cereb. Cortex 26, 1200–1210 (2016).
Rahnev, D., Nee, D. E., Riddle, J., Larson, A. S. & D’Esposito, M. Causal evidence for frontal cortex organization for perceptual decision making. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6059–6064 (2016).
Di Luzio, P., Tarasi, L., Silvanto, J., Avenanti, A. & Romei, V. Human perceptual and metacognitive decision-making rely on distinct brain networks. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001750 (2022).
Saccenti, D. et al. Neural correlates of metacognition: disentangling the brain circuits underlying prospective and retrospective second-order judgments through noninvasive brain stimulation. J. Neurosci. Research 102, e25330 (2024).
Hauser, T. U. et al. Noradrenaline blockade specifically enhances metacognitive performance. eLife 6, 468 (2017).
Nuiten, S. A., de Gee, J. W., Zantvoord, J. B., Fahrenfort, J. J. & van Gaal, S. Pharmacological elevation of catecholamine levels improves perceptual decisions, but not metacognitive insight. Eneuro 11, (2024).
Allen, M. et al. Unexpected arousal modulates the influence of sensory noise on confidence. eLife 5, 403 (2016).
Legrand, N. et al. The heart rate discrimination task: a psychophysical method to estimate the accuracy and precision of interoceptive beliefs. Biol. Psychol. 168, 108239 (2022).
Harrison, O. K. et al. The filter detection task for measurement of breathing-related interoception and metacognition. Biol. Psychol. 165, 108185 (2021).
Rahnev, D. A comprehensive assessment of current methods for measuring metacognition. Nat. Commun. 16, 701 (2025). This paper provides a systematic assessment of the psychometric properties of current popular measures and computational models of metacognition.
Rahnev, D. et al. Consensus goals in the field of visual metacognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1746–1765 (2022).
Katyal, S. & Fleming, S. M. The future of metacognition research: Balancing construct breadth with measurement rigor. Cortex 171, 223–234 (2024).
Maniscalco, B. et al. The relative psychometric function: a general analysis framework for relating psychological processes. Psychol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000625 (2026).
Dayan, P. Metacognitive information theory. Open Mind 7, 392–411 (2023).
Caziot, B. & Mamassian, P. Perceptual confidence judgments reflect self-consistency. J. Vis. 21, 8 (2021).
Koriat, A. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychol. Rev. 119, 80–113 (2012).
Recht, S., Jovanovic, L., Mamassian, P. & Balsdon, T. Confidence at the limits of human nested cognition. Neurosci. Conscious. 2022, niac014 (2022).
Zheng, Y., Recht, S. & Rahnev, D. Common computations for metacognition and meta-metacognition. Neurosci. Conscious. 2023, niad023 (2023).
Perry, C. J. & Barron, A. B. Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19155–19159 (2013).
Amodio, D. M. & Frith, C. D. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268–277 (2006).
Michel, M. Confidence in consciousness research. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 14, e1628 (2023). This review marshals evidence that metacognitive sensitivity is consciousness-selective, integrating theoretical perspectives with empirical data.
Barron, H. C., Mars, R. B., Dupret, D., Lerch, J. P. & Sampaio-Baptista, C. Cross-species neuroscience: closing the explanatory gap. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 376, 20190633 (2021).
Steyvers, M. & Peters, M. A. Metacognition and uncertainty communication in humans and large language models. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 35, 131–139 (2025). This review compares how humans and large language models represent and communicate uncertainty and sets out why the calibration of AI confidence matters for human–artificial intelligence collaboration.
Griot, M., Hemptinne, C., Vanderdonckt, J. & Yuksel, D. Large language models lack essential metacognition for reliable medical reasoning. Nat. Commun. 16, 642 (2025).
Steyvers, M. et al. What large language models know and what people think they know. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 221–231 (2025).
Kadavath, S. et al. Language models (mostly) know what they know. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.05221 (2022).
Binder, F. J. et al. Looking inward: language models can learn about themselves by introspection. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.13787 (2024).
Plunkett, D., Morris, A., Reddy, K. & Morales, J. Self-interpretability: LLMs can describe complex internal processes that drive their decisions, and improve with training. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.17120 (2025).
Lindsey, J. Emergent introspective awareness in large language models. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.01828 (2026).
Ji-An, L., Mattar, M. G., Xiong, H.-D., Benna, M. K. & Wilson, R. C. Language models are capable of metacognitive monitoring and control of their internal activations. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.13763 (2025).
Kumaran, D. et al. Competing biases underlie overconfidence and underconfidence in LLMs. Nat. Mach. Intell. 18, 614–627 (2026).
Kammerer, F. & Frankish, K. What forms could introspective systems take? A research programme. J. Conscious. Stud. 30, 13–48 (2023).
Risko, E. F. & Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive offloading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 676–688 (2016).
Brown, R., Lau, H. & LeDoux, J. E. Understanding the higher-order approach to consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 754–768 (2019).
Lau, H. In Consciousness We Trust: the Cognitive Neuroscience of Subjective Experience (Oxford Univ. Press, 2022).
Simons, J. S., Garrison, J. R. & Johnson, M. K. Brain mechanisms of reality monitoring. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 462–473 (2017).
Dijkstra, N. & Fleming, S. M. Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination. Nat. Commun. 14, 1627 (2023).
Dijkstra, N., von Rein, T., Kok, P. & Fleming, S. M. A neural basis for distinguishing imagination from reality. Neuron 113, 2536–2542 (2025).
Dijkstra, N., Mazor, M. & Fleming, S. M. Confidence ratings do not distinguish imagination from reality. J. Vis. 24, 13–13 (2024).
Mihali, A., Broeker, M., Ragalmuto, F. D. & Horga, G. Introspective inference counteracts perceptual distortion. Nat. Commun. 14, 7826 (2023).
Liu, J. et al. Visual mental imagery in typical imagers and in aphantasia: a millimeter-scale 7-T fMRI study. Cortex 185, 113–132 (2025).
Schmack, K., Bosc, M., Ott, T., Sturgill, J. & Kepecs, A. Striatal dopamine mediates hallucination-like perception in mice. Science 372, eabf4740 (2021).