References
Scandura, T. A. Mentorship and career mobility: an empirical investigation. J. Organ. Behav. 13, 169–174 (1992).
de Janasz, S. C., Sullivan, S. E. & Whiting, V. Mentor networks and career success: lessons for turbulent times. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 17, 78–93 (2003).
Payne, S. C. & Huffman, A. H. A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Acad. Manage. J. 48, 158–168 (2005).
Janosov, M., Musciotto, F., Battiston, F. & Iñiguez, G. Elites, communities and the limited benefits of mentorship in electronic music. Sci. Rep. 10, 3136 (2020).
Delgado, M. & Murray, F. E. Faculty as catalysts for training new inventors: differential outcomes for male and female PhD students. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2200684120 (2023).
Kram, K. E. Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life (Univ. Press America, 1988).
Lee, A., Dennis, C. & Campbell, P. Nature’s guide for mentors. Nature 447, 791–797 (2007).
Bhattacharjee, Y. NSF, NIH emphasize the importance of mentoring. Science 317, 1016 (2007).
Zhang, S., Wapman, K. H., Larremore, D. B. & Clauset, A. Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq7056 (2022).
Green, S. G. Professional entry and the adviser relationship: socialization, commitment, and productivity. Group Organ. Stud. 16, 387–407 (1991).
Enders, J. Border crossings: research training, knowledge dissemination and the transformation of academic work. High. Educ. 49, 119–133 (2005).
Hilmer, M. J. & Hilmer, C. E. Dissertation advisors and initial job placements for economics PhD recipients. Appl. Econ. Lett. 14, 311–314 (2007).
Wright-Harp, W. & Cole, P. A. A mentoring model for enhancing success in graduate education. Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord. 35, 4–16 (2008).
Clauset, A., Arbesman, S. & Larremore, D. B. Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400005 (2015).
Way, S. F., Morgan, A. C., Larremore, D. B. & Clauset, A. Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10729–10733 (2019).
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E. & Lima, L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 89, 127–136 (2004).
Astrove, S. L. What Do Mentors Learn? The Role of Mentor and Protégé Role Behavior and Relationship Quality in Mentor Learning (Univ. Iowa, 2017).
Rossi, L., Freire, I. L. & Mena-Chalco, J. P. Genealogical index: a metric to analyze advisor–advisee relationships. J. Informetr. 11, 564–582 (2017).
Semenov, A., Veremyev, A., Nikolaev, A., Pasiliao, E. L. & Boginski, V. Network-based indices of individual and collective advising impacts in mathematics. Comput. Soc. Netw. 7, 1 (2020).
Roach, M. & Sauermann, H. A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy 39, 422–434 (2010).
Petersen, A. M., Riccaboni, M., Stanley, H. E. & Pammolli, F. Persistence and uncertainty in the academic career. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5213–5218 (2012).
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. & Handelsman, J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16474–16479 (2012).
Ghaffarzadegan, N., Hawley, J., Larson, R. & Xue, Y. A note on PhD population growth in biomedical sciences. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 32, 402–405 (2015).
Milojević, S., Radicchi, F. & Walsh, J. P. Changing demographics of scientific careers: the rise of the temporary workforce. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12616–12623 (2018).
Xing, Y., Zeng, A., Fan, Y. & Di, Z. The strong nonlinear effect in academic dropout. Scientometrics 120, 793–805 (2019).
Woolston, C. PhDs: the tortuous truth. Nature 575, 403–407 (2019).
Huang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R. & Barabási, A.-L. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4609–4616 (2020).
Levine, R. L. & Rathmell, W. K. Covid-19 impact on early career investigators: a call for action. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 357–358 (2020).
Davis, P. B. et al. Pandemic-related barriers to the success of women in research: a framework for action. Nat. Med. 28, 436–438 (2022).
Langin, K. US labs face severe postdoc shortage. Science 376, 1369–1370 (2022).
Woolston, C. Lab leaders wrestle with paucity of postdocs. Nature Career News https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02781-x (30 August 2022).
Spoon, K. et al. Gender and retention patterns among US faculty. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi2205 (2023).
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J. & Gisle, L. Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Res. Policy 46, 868–879 (2017).
Guthrie, S. et al. Understanding mental health in the research environment: a rapid evidence assessment. Rand Health Q. 7, 2 (2018).
González-Betancor, S. M. & Dorta-González, P. Risk of interruption of doctoral studies and mental health in PhD students. Mathematics 8, 1695 (2020).
Murguía Burton, Z. F. & Cao, X. E. Navigating mental health challenges in graduate school. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 421–423 (2022).
Arnold, C. Failed PhD: how scientists have bounced back from doctoral setbacks. Nature 620, 911–912 (2023).
Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., Russell, T. G. & Bychowski, B. Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: an examination of dissertation networks in library and information science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62, 1808–1828 (2011).
Baruffaldi, S., Visentin, F. & Conti, A. The productivity of science and engineering PhD students hired from supervisors’ networks. Res. Policy 45, 785–796 (2016).
Broström, A. Academic breeding grounds: home department conditions and early career performance of academic researchers. Res. Policy 48, 1647–1665 (2019).
Wapman, K. H., Zhang, S., Clauset, A. & Larremore, D. B. Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention. Nature 610, 120–127 (2022).
Lewis, J. M. Carl-Gustaf Rossby: a study in mentorship. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 73, 1425–1439 (1992).
Malmgren, R. D., Ottino, J. M. & Amaral, L. A. N. The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Nature 465, 622–626 (2010).
Liu, J. et al. Understanding the advisor–advisee relationship via scholarly data analysis. Scientometrics 116, 161–180 (2018).
Fortunato, S. et al. Science of science. Science 359, eaao0185 (2018).
Ma, Y., Mukherjee, S. & Uzzi, B. Mentorship and protégé success in stem fields. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14077–14083 (2020).
Liénard, J. F., Achakulvisut, T., Acuna, D. E. & David, S. V. Intellectual synthesis in mentorship determines success in academic careers. Nat. Commun. 9, 4840 (2018).
Wuestman, M., Frenken, K. & Wanzenböck, I. A genealogical approach to academic success. PLoS ONE 15, e0243913 (2020).
Patsali, S., Pezzoni, M. & Visentin, F. Research independence: drivers and impact on PhD students’ careers. Stud. High. Educ. 49, 2560–2583 (2024).
Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F. & Livan, G. Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers. Nat. Commun. 10, 5170 (2019).
Sekara, V. et al. The chaperone effect in scientific publishing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12603–12607 (2018).
Marx, V. Sizing a lab. Nat. Methods 20, 1833 (2023).
Johnson, W. B. & Huwe, J. M. Toward a typology of mentorship dysfunction in graduate school. Psychotherapy 39, 44–55 (2002).
Luckhaupt, S. E. et al. Mentorship in academic general internal medicine. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 20, 1014–1018 (2005).
Ke, Q., Liang, L., Ding, Y., David, S. V. & Acuna, D. E. A dataset of mentorship in bioscience with semantic and demographic estimations. Sci. Data 9, 467 (2022).
David, S. V. & Hayden, B. Y. Neurotree: a collaborative, graphical database of the academic genealogy of neuroscience. PLoS ONE 7, e46608 (2012).
Sinha, A. et al. An overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and applications. In Proc. 24th International Conference on World Wide Web 243–246 (ACM, 2015).
Wang, K. et al. A review of Microsoft Academic Services for science of science studies. Front. Big Data 2, 45 (2019).
Iacus, S., King, G. & Porro, G. CEM: software for coarsened exact matching. J. Stat. Softw. 30, 1–27 (2009).
Iacus, S. M., King, G. & Porro, G. Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Polit. Anal. 20, 1–24 (2012).
Xu, F., Wu, L. & Evans, J. Flat teams drive scientific innovation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200927119 (2022).
Lin, Y., Evans, J. A. & Wu, L. New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord. J. Informetr. 16, 101234 (2022).
Lin, Y., Frey, C. B. & Wu, L. Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. Nature 623, 987–991 (2023).
Leung, K.-M., Elashoff, R. M. & Afifi, A. A. Censoring issues in survival analysis. Annu. Rev. Public Health 18, 83–104 (1997).
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007).
Wu, L., Wang, D. & Evans, J. A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566, 378–382 (2019).
Yin, Y. & Wang, D. The time dimension of science: connecting the past to the future. J. Informetr. 11, 608–621 (2017).
Clauset, A., Larremore, D. B. & Sinatra, R. Data-driven predictions in the science of science. Science 355, 477–480 (2017).
Venkatraman, V. Conventions of scientific authorship. Science Careers https://www.science.org/content/article/conventions-scientific-authorship-0 (16 April 2010).
Huang, M.-h, Hsieh, H.-T. & Lin, C.-S. The co-first and co-corresponding author phenomenon in the pharmacy and anesthesia journals. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53, 1–4 (2016).
Pain, E. et al. How to navigate authorship of scientific manuscripts. Science Careers https://www.science.org/content/article/how-navigate-authorship-scientific-manuscripts (6 May 2021).
Schwartz, L. P., Liénard, J. & David, S. V. Impact of gender on the formation and outcome of mentoring relationships in academic research. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07780 (2021).
Wuestman, M., Wanzenböck, I. & Frenken, K. Local peer communities and future academic success of Ph.D. candidates. Res. Policy 52, 104844 (2023).
Yanai, I. & Lercher, M. It takes two to think. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 18–19 (2024).
Lariviere, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C. R. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature 504, 211–213 (2013).
Dutt, K., Pfaff, D. L., Bernstein, A. F., Dillard, J. S. & Block, C. J. Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience. Nat. Geosci. 9, 805–808 (2016).
Dennehy, T. C. & Dasgupta, N. Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5964–5969 (2017).
Hernandez, P. R. et al. Inspiration, inoculation, and introductions are all critical to successful mentorship for undergraduate women pursuing geoscience careers. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 7 (2020).
Cui, H., Wu, L. & Evans, J. A. Aging scientists and slowed advance. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.04044 (2022).
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G. & Stuart, E. A. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit. Anal. 15, 199–236 (2007).
Priem, J., Piwowar, H. & Orr, R. OpenAlex: a fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833 (2022).
Ke, Q., Liang, L., Ding, Y., David, S. V. & Acuna, D. E. A dataset of mentorship in science with semantic and demographic estimations [Data set]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4917086 (2021).
Xing, Y. A dataset for scientific group analysis [Data set]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14874607 (2025).
Xing, Y. Scientific group size and performance. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14870727 (2025).