Wind power and solar photovoltaics found to have higher energy returns than fossil fuels

1. Raugei, M. & Leccisi, E. A comprehensive assessment of the energy performance of electricity generation technologies deployed in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 90, 46–59 (2020). This article presents a net energy analysis of electricity generation technologies.

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Marshall, Z. et al. A country-level primary-final-useful (CL-PFU) energy and exergy database v1.2, 1960-2020. University of Leeds Data Repository (5 February 2024); https://archive.researchdata.leeds.ac.uk/1234/. The online repository associated with the CL-PFU database that we used to determine the useful-stage EROIs.

3. Slameršak, A., Kallis, G. & O’Neill, D. W. Energy requirements and carbon emissions for a low-carbon energy transition. Nat. Commun. 13, 6932 (2022). This paper reports a dynamic analysis of the net energy aspects and CO₂ emissions of the energy transition.

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Heun, M. K., Marshall, Z. & Aramendia, E. CLPFUDatabase: A suite of R packages for energy conversion chain analysis. J. Open Source Softw. 9, 6057 (2024). This paper introduces the software developed to build the CL-PFU database used in this work.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Murphy, D. J., Raugei, M., Carbajales-Dale, M. & Rubio Estrada, B. Energy return on investment of major energy carriers: review and harmonisation. Sustainability 14, 7098 (2022). An article that reviews and harmonizes the EROIs published in the literature for major energy carriers.

   Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Aramendia, A. et al. Estimation of useful-stage energy returns on investment for fossil fuels and implications for renewable energy systems. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01518-6 (2024).