Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

7 min read Original article ↗

Change history

  • 02 July 2018

    In the version of ‘Supplementary Data 1’ originally published with this Article, the units for the ‘Capacity|Electricity|*’ variables in the ‘Non_Investment_Annual’ tab were incorrectly given as EJ/yr; they should have read GW. This has now been corrected. Also, some of the variables listed in the ‘Non_Investment_Variable_Defs’ were not required and have therefore been removed.

References

  1. Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  2. Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim. Change 123, 353–367 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Riahi, K. in Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future (eds Johansson, T. B. et al.) 1203–1306 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).

  4. Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carraro, C., Favero, A., & Masetti, E. Investments and public finance in a green, low carbon, economy. Energy Econ. 34, S15–S28 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perspectives for the Energy Transition—Investment Needs for a Low-Carbon Energy System (OECD/IEA & IRENA, 2017).

  7. McCollum, D. L. et al. Energy investments under climate policy: a comparison of global models. Clim. Change Econ. 04, 1340010 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Annex to G20 Leaders Declaration: G20 Hamburg Climate and Energy Action Plan for Growth (G20, 2017).

  9. Paris Agreement Decision 1/CP.17 (UNFCCC, 2015).

  10. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1) (UN, 2015).

  11. Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Masui, T. & Takahashi, K. Land use representation in a global CGE model for long-term simulation: CET vs. logit functions. Food Secur. 6, 685–699 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujimori, S., Masui, T. & Matsuoka, Y. AIM/CGE [basic] Manual Discussion Paper Series (Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 2012).

  13. Stehfest, E. et al. Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0. Model Description and Policy Applications. (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2014).

  14. Fricko, O. et al. The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 251–267 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krey, V. et al. MESSAGE-GLOBIOM 1.0 Documentation (IIASA, 2016).

  16. Criqui, P., Mima, S., Menanteau, P. & Kitous, A. Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: an assessment with the POLES model. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 90, 119–136 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keramidas, K., Kitous, A. G., Després, J. & Schmitz, A. POLES-JRC Model Documentation. EUR 28728 EN. Report JRC107387 (Joint Research Center, 2017).

  18. Kriegler, E. et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 297–315 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luderer, G. et al. Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034033 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E. & Tavoni, M. WITCH: a World Induced Technical Change Hybrid model. Energy J. 27, 13–37 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Emmerling, J. et al. The WITCH 2016 Model—Documentation and Implementation of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 2016).

  22. Iyer, G. et al. Measuring progress from nationally determined contributions to mid-century strategies. Nat. Clim. Change (in the press).

  23. GCAM Documentation http://jgcri.github.io/gcam-doc/toc.html (PNNL, 2016).

  24. Cameron, C. et al. Policy trade-offs between climate mitigation and clean cook-stove access in South Asia. Nat. Energy 1, e15010 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amann, M. et al. Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications. Environ. Model. Softw. 26, 1489–1501 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abel, G. J., Barakat, B., KC, S. & Lutz, W. Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals leads to lower world population growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 14294–14299 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parkinson, S. et al. Balancing clean water-climate change mitigation trade-offs. IIASA Working Paper WP-18-005 (IIASA, 2018).

  28. Parkinson, S. C. et al. Climate and human development impacts on municipal water demand: a spatially-explicit global modeling framework. Environ. Model. Softw. 85, 266–278 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. World Energy Investment 2016 (OECD/IEA, 2016).

  31. World Energy Investment 2017 (OECD/IEA, 2017).

  32. Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. The Emissions Gap Report 2016 (UNEP, 2016).

  34. ADVANCE contributors. ADVANCE wiki: The Common Integrated Assessment Model (CIAM) Documentation Website (CIAM, 2017); http://themasites.pbl.nl/models/advance/index.php/ADVANCE_wiki

  35. Grubler, A. et al. in Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future (eds Johansson, T. B. et al.) 1665–1744 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).

  36. Millar, R. J. et al. Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Nat. Geosci. 10, 741–747 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. World Bank Statistical Database (World Bank, 2018); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.DEFL.ZS.AD?locations=US

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding by the World Bank and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 642147 (‘CD-LINKS’ project). S.F. is supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (2-1702) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency Japan and JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP16K18177. P. Kolp of IIASA is also recognized for his assistance with Web database development and support. The views expressed by J.D. and A.S. are purely theirs and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria

    David L. McCollum, Wenji Zhou, Sebastian Busch, Oliver Fricko, Shinichiro Fujimori, Matthew Gidden, Daniel Huppmann, Volker Krey, Shonali Pachauri, Simon Parkinson, Miguel Poblete-Cazenave, Peter Rafaj, Narasimha Rao, Wolfgang Schoepp & Keywan Riahi

  2. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

    David L. McCollum

  3. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany

    Christoph Bertram & Elmar Kriegler

  4. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Harmen-Sytze de Boer, Mathijs Harmsen & Detlef van Vuuren

  5. EuroMediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Milan, Italy

    Valentina Bosetti, Laurent Drouet & Johannes Emmerling

  6. Bocconi University, Milan, Italy

    Valentina Bosetti

  7. Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission , Seville, Spain

    Jacques Després & Andreas Schmitz

  8. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Marianne Fay, Claire Nicolas & Julie Rozenberg

  9. National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Ibaraki, Japan

    Shinichiro Fujimori

  10. Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Mathijs Harmsen & Detlef van Vuuren

  11. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), College Park, MD, USA

    Gokul Iyer

  12. University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

    Simon Parkinson

  13. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA

    Keywan Riahi

Authors

  1. David L. McCollum
  2. Wenji Zhou
  3. Christoph Bertram
  4. Harmen-Sytze de Boer
  5. Valentina Bosetti
  6. Sebastian Busch
  7. Jacques Després
  8. Laurent Drouet
  9. Johannes Emmerling
  10. Marianne Fay
  11. Oliver Fricko
  12. Shinichiro Fujimori
  13. Matthew Gidden
  14. Mathijs Harmsen
  15. Daniel Huppmann
  16. Gokul Iyer
  17. Volker Krey
  18. Elmar Kriegler
  19. Claire Nicolas
  20. Shonali Pachauri
  21. Simon Parkinson
  22. Miguel Poblete-Cazenave
  23. Peter Rafaj
  24. Narasimha Rao
  25. Julie Rozenberg
  26. Andreas Schmitz
  27. Wolfgang Schoepp
  28. Detlef van Vuuren
  29. Keywan Riahi

Contributions

D.L.M., K.R., J.R., M.F. and C.N. posed the initial research questions to frame the study and then selected the scenarios to analyse. V.K., M.G., O.F., D.H., S.F., M.H., D.v.V., H.-S.d.B., C.B., E.K., J.E., L.D., V.B., J.D., A.S. and G.I. ran the integrated assessment models for obtaining the energy investments. V.K., Si.P., Sh.P., M.P.-C., N.R., P.R., W.S. and S.F. carried out the investment analyses for the other SDGs. W.Z. and D.L.M. compiled and analysed results from all models and analyses. D.L.M. and W.Z. led the writing of the manuscript, with all other authors contributing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. McCollum.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCollum, D.L., Zhou, W., Bertram, C. et al. Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Energy 3, 589–599 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z