- NEWS FEATURE
Tens of thousands of publications from 2025 might include invalid references generated by AI, a Nature analysis suggests.
By
- Miryam Naddaf
-
Elizabeth Quill
-
Elizabeth Quill is a freelance editor in Washington DC.
-
Illustration: Adam Wójcicki
Earlier this year, computer scientist Guillaume Cabanac received a notification from Google Scholar that one of his publications had been cited in a paper published in the International Dental Journal1. That was unexpected, because his research on spotting fabricated papers doesn’t typically intersect with dentistry. “I was very surprised to see that I couldn’t recognize my own reference,” says Cabanac, who is based at the University of Toulouse in France.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 652, 26-29 (2026)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-00969-z
References
Duane, B., Ashley, P. & Larkin, J. Int. Dent. J. 76, 103979 (2026).
Cabanac, G., Labbé, C. & Magazinov, A. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06751 (2021).
Sakai, Y., Kamigaito, H. & Watanabe, T. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.18724 (2026).
Bienz, A., Pearson, C. & Garcia de Gonzalo, S. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.05867 (2026).
Baethge, C. & Jergas, H. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 10, 13 (2025).
Cobb, C. L., Crumly, B., Montero-Zamora, P., Schwartz, S. J. & Martínez, C. R. Jr Am. Psychol. 79, 299–311 (2024).
Linardon, J. et al. JMIR Ment. Health 12, e80371 (2025).
Liang, W. et al. Nature Hum. Behav. 9, 2599–2609 (2025).
Abbonato, D. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.15871 (2026).
Resnik, D. B. & Hosseini, M. Account. Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2645390 (2026).
Related Articles
-
Take Nature’s AI research test: find out how your ethics compare
-
How to spot suspicious papers: a sleuthing guide for scientists
-
These universities have the most retracted scientific articles
Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science?