- CAREER COLUMN
After turning off ChatGPT’s ‘data consent’ option, Marcel Bucher lost the work behind grant applications, teaching materials and publication drafts. Here’s what happened next.
By
-
Marcel Bucher
-
Marcel Bucher is a professor of plant molecular physiology at the University of Cologne and member of the CEPLAS Cluster of Excellence, where his research focuses on plant-microbe interactions, arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, and nutrient signalling.
-
Within a couple of years of ChatGPT coming out, I had come to rely on the artificial-intelligence tool, for my work as a professor of plant sciences at the University of Cologne in Germany. Having signed up for OpenAI’s subscription plan, ChatGPT Plus, I used it as an assistant every day — to write e-mails, draft course descriptions, structure grant applications, revise publications, prepare lectures, create exams and analyse student responses, and even as an interactive tool as part of my teaching.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-04064-7
This is an article from the Nature Careers Community, a place for Nature readers to share their professional experiences and advice. Guest posts are encouraged.
Subscribe to Nature Briefing: Careers, an unmissable free weekly round-up of help and advice for working scientists.
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Related Articles
-
AI for research: the ultimate guide to choosing the right tool
-
Why universities need to radically rethink exams in the age of AI
Subjects
Latest on:
-
Reckoning with my ‘ghost years’: why a low publication rate doesn’t always reflect failure
Career Column
-
The ethical risks of open-access agreements being used for authorship leverage
Correspondence
-
Privilege, power and vulnerability in science: precarious funding can prompt unethical ties
Correspondence
PhD training needs a reboot in an AI world