- NEWS
Nature asked researchers who use artificial intelligence how its propensity for people-pleasing affects their work — and what they are doing to mitigate it.
By
-
Miryam Naddaf
-
Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London.
-
Artificial intelligence (AI) models are 50% more sycophantic than humans, an analysis published this month has found.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 647, 13-14 (2025)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03390-0
References
Cheng, M. et al. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.01395 (2025).
Petrov, I., Dekoninck, J. & Vechev, M. Preprint arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.04721 (2025).
McCoy, L. et al. NEJM AI https://doi.org/10.1056/AIdbp2500120 (2025).
Chen, S. et al. NPJ Digit. Med. 8, 605 (2025).
Related Articles
-
AI for research: the ultimate guide to choosing the right tool
-
AI ‘scientists’ joined these research teams: here’s what happened
-
‘AI models are capable of novel research’: OpenAI’s chief scientist on what to expect
-
AI linked to explosion of low-quality biomedical research papers
-
How AI-powered science search engines can speed up your research