- COMMENT
Without clear protocols to catch errors, artificial intelligence’s growing role in science could do more harm than good.
By
-
Arvind Narayanan
-
Arvind Narayanan is a computer scientist at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
-
-
Sayash Kapoor
-
Sayash Kapoor is a computer scientist at the Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
-
Illustration: Denis Freitas
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is exploding across many branches of science. Between 2012 and 2022, the average proportion of scientific papers engaging with AI, across 20 fields, quadrupled (see ‘AI’s rise in research’), including economics, geology, political science and psychology1.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 640, 312-314 (2025)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01067-2
References
Duede, E. et al. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.15828 (2024).
Kapoor, S. & Narayanan, A. Patterns 4, 100804 (2024).
Roberts, M. et al. Nature Mach. Intell. 3, 199–217 (2021).
Breiman, L. Statist. Sci. 16, 199–231 (2001).
Messeri, L. & Crockett, M. J. Nature 627, 49–58 (2024).
Kapoor, S. et al. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk3452 (2024).
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related Articles
-
Will AI jeopardize science photography? There’s still time to create an ethical code of conduct
-
Can AI have common sense? Finding out will be key to achieving machine intelligence
-
AI tools as science policy advisers? The potential and the pitfalls
A shout-out for AI studies that don’t make the headlines
Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science?