Abstract
We present a rigorous benchmark comparing AWS Trainium (trn1 instances) and NVIDIA CUDA (g5 instances with A10G GPUs) for training convolutional neural networks on medical image classification. Using the NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset with 112,120 chest radiographs and 14 thoracic disease labels, we evaluate ResNet-50 and ConvNeXt architectures across both platforms. Our key findings are threefold: (1) Trainium achieves virtually identical accuracy to CUDA for compatible architectures (ConvNeXt-Pico: F1=0.8007 vs 0.8027, Δ=0.25%), (2) modern CNN architectures using depthwise convolutions and LayerNorm (ConvNeXt-Tiny and larger) fail to compile or load on Trainium due to hardware constraints, and (3) Trainium is 3–5 × more expensive than CUDA for CNN training even with correct instance sizing. We document the substantial porting effort required, including four critical XLA-specific code modifications, and provide guidance for practitioners considering Trainium for computer vision workloads.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available in an AWS S3 bucket, the access method is described in the paper