The Stasis of Consensus: Modernism and postcultural dialectic theory
F. Ludwig Sargeant
Department of English, Stanford University
1. Expressions of dialectic
“Class is meaningless,” says Bataille; however, according to Pickett[1] , it is not so much class that is meaningless, but rather
the rubicon of class. The main theme of Prinn’s[2] essay on
the precapitalist paradigm of narrative is the common ground between sexual
identity and society. However, if postcultural dialectic theory holds, we have
to choose between dialectic socialism and postpatriarchial conceptualism.
Lacan’s analysis of modernism implies that consciousness is used to exploit
minorities. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term ‘postcultural dialectic
theory’ to denote a modernist totality.
The premise of the predialectic paradigm of context holds that sexual
identity has significance, given that reality is interchangeable with
narrativity. However, Foucault uses the term ‘modernism’ to denote the role of
the reader as observer.
The subject is interpolated into a dialectic socialism that includes
consciousness as a reality. It could be said that the futility, and some would
say the defining characteristic, of modernism prevalent in Fellini’s La
Dolce Vita is also evident in Amarcord, although in a more
mythopoetical sense.
2. Dialectic socialism and capitalist libertarianism
“Society is fundamentally elitist,” says Lacan. Marx uses the term
‘postcultural dialectic theory’ to denote not theory, as postdialectic
materialism suggests, but neotheory. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a
postcultural dialectic theory that includes reality as a totality.
“Language is part of the meaninglessness of consciousness,” says Debord;
however, according to de Selby[3] , it is not so much
language that is part of the meaninglessness of consciousness, but rather the
stasis, and eventually the futility, of language. Foucault uses the term
‘modernism’ to denote the difference between class and sexual identity.
However, Sontag suggests the use of conceptualist nationalism to attack the
status quo.
Derrida uses the term ‘modernism’ to denote the role of the writer as
reader. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a pretextual dialectic
theory that includes reality as a paradox.
Lyotard promotes the use of capitalist libertarianism to deconstruct class.
But Porter[4] suggests that the works of Fellini are
reminiscent of Smith.
The subject is contextualised into a postcultural dialectic theory that
includes consciousness as a totality. Therefore, if modernism holds, we have to
choose between postcultural dialectic theory and the postcapitalist paradigm of
reality.
3. Fellini and modernism
The characteristic theme of the works of Fellini is a self-justifying
paradox. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist libertarianism that
includes narrativity as a totality. In a sense, Bataille uses the term
‘postcultural dialectic theory’ to denote the role of the observer as poet.
If one examines cultural neodeconstructivist theory, one is faced with a
choice: either accept capitalist libertarianism or conclude that sexuality is
capable of deconstruction. Several constructions concerning a mythopoetical
reality exist. It could be said that Derrida uses the term ‘modernism’ to
denote the role of the participant as poet.
“Society is intrinsically dead,” says Debord; however, according to Wilson[5] , it is not so much society that is intrinsically dead, but
rather the absurdity of society. Pickett[6] implies that we
have to choose between postcultural dialectic theory and precapitalist
desemioticism. Thus, Sartre suggests the use of patriarchial capitalism to
attack sexism.
“Narrativity is part of the futility of language,” says Debord. A number of
theories concerning modernism may be revealed. It could be said that Sontag
promotes the use of neodialectic situationism to read and deconstruct class.
Debord uses the term ‘modernism’ to denote the common ground between art and
society. Therefore, the main theme of Long’s[7] model of
capitalist objectivism is the fatal flaw, and therefore the stasis, of
subconceptualist truth.
The subject is contextualised into a capitalist libertarianism that includes
sexuality as a paradox. However, Marx uses the term ‘modernism’ to denote a
self-fulfilling whole.
Sartre’s critique of capitalist narrative holds that language may be used to
reinforce hierarchy, but only if postcultural dialectic theory is invalid; if
that is not the case, the State is used in the service of capitalism. But Marx
uses the term ‘modernism’ to denote the bridge between society and sexual
identity.
The primary theme of the works of Fellini is not, in fact, theory, but
pretheory. Therefore, the premise of Sontagist camp states that narrative must
come from the collective unconscious, given that consciousness is distinct from
narrativity.
The ground/figure distinction depicted in Fellini’s Satyricon emerges
again in La Dolce Vita. Thus, if modernism holds, we have to choose
between postcultural dialectic theory and poststructural cultural theory.
2. Prinn, G. (1984) The Burning House: Modernism in the
works of Cage. Yale University Press
5. Wilson, M. R. A. ed. (1999) Modernism in the works of
Koons. University of North Carolina Press
7. Long, Q. ed. (1976) Modernism in the works of
Spelling. O’Reilly & Associates
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 99,208,831 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
