 |
| The infamous photo, captured when the monkey pressed the shutter, has become the subject of a years-long copyright dispute that has left Slater broke. Photo: David Slater |
Freelance photographer David Slater, once one of the most talked-about photographers in the world because of his serendipitous 'monkey selfies,' is now considering dog walking... or giving tennis lessons. According to The Guardian, the selfsame selfie that made Slater famous has left him broke after years of legal disputes between Slater and both Wikimedia and PETA.
In case you've not been following this strangest of copyright battles, the details are as follows. In 2011, Slater traveled to Sulawesi, Indonesia where, by his account, he managed to coax some macaques to start playing with his camera gear. Slater did this on purpose, he says, because he was having trouble getting a close up wide-angle shot of the monkeys with their eyes open.
His gambit worked. One of the macaques took a few 'selfies' that immediately went viral, earning Slater a few thousand pounds... then the legal troubles started.
Wikimedia refused to take down the photo at Slater's request, claiming that he wasn't the copyright holder since he didn't press the shutter. Then the US Copyright Office ruled that animals cannot own copyrights, leaving the photo ostensibly author-less. And finally, since Slater continues to claim copyright, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) sued him on behalf of the macaque in 2015.
That pretty much brings us to yesterday's article in The Guardian, in which Slater admits that years of legal battles have left him broke and ready to 'pack it all in.' He couldn't even afford the airfare to attend his own trial in San Francisco this week—instead, he watched a livestream of the trial from his home in the UK.
Slater's current predicament isn't just a cautionary tale for photographers who dream of going viral, it offers fascinating insights into the archaic laws surrounding authorship and copyright. Of course, the idea that this case might prevent future photographers from going through something similar is probably small consolation for Slater at this junction.
You may also like
Latest sample galleries
Latest in-depth reviews
The EOS R6 III did well at almost every test we put it through, from shooting stills to filming several videos.
Sony brings its mainline camera up to the latest standards, but not much further.
The S1II features a partially-stacked sensor, and may be Panasonic's first great do-it-all full frame camera.
The Leica Q3 Monochrom is a black-and-white version of the company's wide-angle compact but brings a couple of updates, some of which Q3 and Q3 43 owners will gain soon.
We've fully tested the OM-5 II to see how it holds up compared to the competition
Latest buying guides
What’s the best camera for under $3000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.
'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked.
Around $1000 is increasingly becoming the entry point for modern interchangeable lens cameras. We look at what you can get for your money, and which we think is best. Updated following our review of the Nikon Z50II.
The fixed lens camera market may be niche, but it's home to some of the best cameras you can buy.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These midrange cameras should have capable autofocus systems, lots of direct controls and the latest sensors offering great image quality. We recommend our favorite options.