When asked about his attempts to charge her money, he initially said he did not require payment in exchange for removing content and was open to reviewing any situations where there had been "any misunderstanding or miscommunication in specific instances".
When asked further, he said the reference to "removal as a paid service" was intended in the context of separate content-related requests, such as editing or usage arrangements, and "not as a condition for removing content in response to personal concerns".
"I understand how that wording may have been interpreted differently, and I regret that it was not clearer," he added.
However, Alice never asked for these services - she only asked for the video to be taken down. He refused to give further clarification.
"He's got the file, which still makes me feel uneasy, still constantly having to check back and see if he is uploading the video again. I just feel powerless," Alice said.
"If you don't consent to content being out there of yourself, it can actually be very dangerous. It's just a complete breach of privacy and data."
The BBC knows of another woman that contacted this man to ask for their videos to be taken down.
We cannot know how many of the women he has filmed were aware of what was happening to them.
The BBC found multiple accounts run by the same man across YouTube, Instagram, and Threads, which post similar content.
Meta, the company that owns Instagram and Threads, as well as making smart glasses, has not given the BBC a comment but has taken down the video of Alice which was reposted.
The YouTube account posting similar videos is no longer active.
Filming in public is rarely a crime, but it can come under existing harassment laws.
"Whether a person is breaking the law by covertly filming another will all depend on context," said Paul Lewis, head of crime at DPP Law Solicitors.
Where someone is filmed, what is filmed, and the purpose of filming and posting to social media are important considerations.
Law researcher Prof Clare McGlynn, of Durham University, said what happened to Alice could be considered more serious.
She said in this case the man was "refusing to take something down, unless the victim pays him money, and that is a threat to that victim".
This behaviour was "not your standard blackmail" where someone takes an intimate image and threatens to post it online as the video of Alice had already been posted, she added.
"It's extremely worrying," said Dr Beatriz Kira, an assistant professor from the University of Sussex law school.
People posting content on social media can make money from doing so. For example, TikTok offers a Creators Rewards Programme which rewards influencers for posting popular videos.
Kira says more needs to be done to stop social media platforms and influencers making money from content that is harmful.
There need to be "solutions not only focused on taking down the content but really cutting incentives at the root", she said.
A government spokesperson said that "women and girls deserve to feel safe" and that "filming and sharing content online without their consent is vile and will not be tolerated".
They added that the new Violence Against Women and Girls strategy, published in 2025, set out "measures to tackle abuse enabled by technology, to help protect victims and hold perpetrators to account".