Let me try to explain a point which I think isn't widely known: in computing attack rates, the distribution of infectious contacts a person MAKES is less important than the distribution of such contacts they RECEIVE. Maybe we should care about “superspreadees”! •1/44

1 min read Original article ↗

Post

Let me try to explain a point which I think isn't widely known: in computing attack rates, the distribution of infectious contacts a person MAKES is less important than the distribution of such contacts they RECEIVE. Maybe we should care about “superspreadees”! •1/44

Don't miss what's happening

People on X are the first to know.

Log inSign up