We checked 254,854 Telegram channels. One in five is dead

· TGList ·

6 min read Original article ↗
← Research & Development

One in five had not posted in over a year. The deadest corner of Telegram is English-language crypto, and it is holding half a billion abandoned subscriptions

TGList indexes 3.1M Telegram channels. For 254,854 of them we hold two timestamps: the date of the last post, and the date we looked. That pair answers a question nobody has answered at this scale — how much of Telegram still publishes anything.

19.2% had been silent between three months and a year. 47.9% had posted within thirty days. The median channel had said nothing for 36 days.

These 254,854 channels skew large. Their median subscriber count is 6,242, against 624 for the 2.1M channels we have not crawled deeply enough to measure. This article describes big, catalogued, findable channels. The tail below them is deader than what follows, not livelier.

Half of Telegram's measured channels had stopped posting

254,854 channels, silence measured at the moment of observation

Last post published

47.9

%

Less than 30 days ago

13.3

%

1 to 3 months ago

19.2

%

3 to 12 months ago

19.6

%

More than a year ago

254,854 channels · 6.2B subscriptions

Weighting by audience improves the picture by four points

the same channels, counted by subscriptions

Last post published

59.9

%

Less than 30 days ago

10.3

%

1 to 3 months ago

14.6

%

3 to 12 months ago

15.2

%

More than a year ago

Large channels publish more often, so the active share rises to 59.9%. 15.2% of all subscriptions still sit in channels silent for over a year.

Channels that pass two years of silence do not return

Share of channels still silent after N months

all 254,854 measured channels

0%25%50%75%100%061218243036months of silence at the moment we observed the channel

Just over half had gone a month without posting. The curve flattens near eighteen months. Past that point the population stops shrinking, because the channels remaining in it have stopped for good.

Size protects until a million subscribers, then stops

Death rates fall from the small bands up to 100k-1M, where 10.9% are dead. Above a million subscribers they double to 19.6%. The largest channels on the platform die at the rate of channels a hundred times smaller.

Death rate by subscriber band

share silent over a year

The relationship breaks at the top band. The tap-to-earn section below explains why.

English channels die at twice the Russian rate

29.7% of English channels were dead, against 13.5% of Russian ones and 9.5% of Ukrainian ones.

Death rate by language

languages with at least 400 measured channels

Indonesian, Chinese and English lead. Ukrainian, Burmese and Turkish sit at the bottom

Crypto is the deadest category and the largest by audience

Crypto carries 860.1M subscriptions, more than any other category, and 32.9% of its channels were dead against 7.1% for fashion. Two categories a technical audience is likely to be subscribed to sit near the top: techchannels at 32.1% and AI at 26.9%.

Death rate by category

categories with at least 500 measured channels

Categories are assigned by an automated analyser. A channel carries one category.

The 2024 tap-to-earn boom left 479 million subscriptions behind

1,131 channels hold at least 100,000 subscribers each and had not posted for over a year. Together they carry 478.9M subscriptions. 90 of them exceed a million subscribers apiece and hold 239.6M between them.

Crypto and gaming account for 64% of those abandoned subscriptions. English-language channels account for 76%. The tap-to-earn games of 2024 sit at the top of the list: Hamster Kombat reached 24.3 million subscribers and stopped, TapSwap 12.0 million, X Empire 10.0 million, Tomarket 8.4 million.

One episode explains three anomalies above. It is why the million-plus band dies at twice the rate of the band below it, why English is the deadest major language, and why crypto carries both the most subscriptions and one of the highest death rates. A speculative bubble gathered audiences larger than most national broadcasters and left them subscribed to channels that say nothing.

Where the abandoned audience sits, by category

all 1,131 channels above 100K subscribers that had been silent over a year

Counted across the full set, not a sample. Crypto alone holds more abandoned subscriptions than every other category combined.

Where the abandoned audience sits, by language

the same 1,131 channels

English carries three quarters of the abandoned audience while holding a quarter of the measured index.

The fourteen largest abandoned channels

subscriber counts and last-post dates as recorded at our observation

A channel may have resumed posting since we looked. The median silence across the million-plus group is 542 days.

Posting cadence predicts death better than size does

Channels our analyser recorded as posting several times a day were dead in 9.2% of cases. Channels recorded as posting rarely were dead in 46.3% of cases. The gradient runs monotonically across all five levels.

Death rate by posting cadence

cadence recorded at analysis time, death measured at observation

The bottom row is partly definitional — a channel posting rarely starts closer to silence. The gradient across the three daily tiers is not, and it runs from 9% to 17%.

Dead channels score three times higher on engagement

Our engagement rate divides views on recent posts by subscribers. It reads 0.45 for dead channels and 0.15 for active ones. By that metric the deadest channels on Telegram outperform the living ones threefold.

Views on a Telegram post keep accumulating for as long as the post exists, while the subscriber count of an abandoned channel decays. A post from 2024 has collected two years of views and divides by a shrinking denominator. If that accounts for the inversion, then engagement rate measures nothing on a channel that has stopped, and any ranking that rewards it promotes corpses. We have not separated the two effects. We publish the anomaly rather than a confident explanation of it.

Median engagement rate by silence bucket

the metric inverts

Reported as measured. Dead channels are not engaging.

Cut the data yourself

Pick a category, a language and a size band. The explorer recomputes the split for that slice and lists the largest channels in it that have been silent for over a year.

It runs on a contingency table, not on channel records. We ship counts per category × language × size band, and combinations holding fewer than five channels are suppressed entirely. The only channels named anywhere in the file are the 1,131 above 100,000 subscribers that had been silent for over a year — the subject of this article. Nothing about a live channel leaves our database.

Silence by any slice you choose

counts covering 247,443 of the 254,854 measured channels

Loading…

Numbers beside each option show how many channels remain under the other filters. Everything is computed in the browser from the static file linked below.