The Greenhushing Trap

3 min read Original article ↗

MIT Sloan Management Review Logo

Magazine Winter 2026 Issue Radar

Companies that try to limit communication about sustainability efforts end up undermining their own progress — but so do those that communicate excessively.

Reading Time: 1 min 

Topics

Radar

Brief insights on emerging trends in management from the opening pages of MIT Sloan Management Review’s quarterly print magazine.

More in this series

golubovy/Getty Images

Summary:

In a 2025 survey, 39% of U.S. companies said they had reduced or completely stopped publicly promoting their sustainability efforts while maintaining their investments. Such greenhushing can undermine work toward sustainable business transformation. Recent analysis of 15 years of data reveals an inverted-U-shaped relationship between sustainability communication and action: Strategic communication drives change and accountability, but overcommunication dilutes focus.

Should companies still talk about their sustainability efforts — and, if so, how much? According to a July 2025 report, 39% of U.S. companies surveyed had reduced or stopped publicly promoting their sustainability investments even while maintaining or increasing them relative to 2024.

This retreat into silence — greenhushing — can undermine a company’s serious sustainability ambitions. Our recent research, based on a comprehensive analysis of 15 years of ESG data and 10-K filings, shows that companies that publicly communicate bold sustainability goals can trigger the internal processes, alignment, and momentum that make those goals more likely to be achieved — but excessive talk can impede this effect.

This inverted-U-shaped relationship between communication and action has three strategic implications for managers:

1. If you want to transform your business, you should talk. Communicating a company’s sustainability vision and goals clarifies the company’s identity for employees and focuses their attention on aligning actions with sustainability goals. It also increases accountability to external stakeholders to meet sustainability commitments.

2. Talk, but don’t overpromise. Overcommunication on sustainability can impede the realization of goals. Optimize the level of talk to balance aspiration with feasibility. Strive for clear sustainability goals that do not overstrain managers, avoid internal conflicts, and maintain credibility with external stakeholders.

3. Leave space between words and deeds. Sustainability transformation typically unfolds in stages. Initial communication sets the direction and expectations, symbolic steps build the necessary frameworks, and substantive change embeds sustainability into the core of the business. Recognizing and communicating these phases helps leaders manage expectations, maintain credibility, and sustain momentum — even when results take time to achieve.

The best approach, we find, is one of transparency. In this context, silence is not neutrality — it is a missed opportunity to lead the transformation.

Topics

Radar

Brief insights on emerging trends in management from the opening pages of MIT Sloan Management Review’s quarterly print magazine.

More in this series

About the Authors

Frederik Maibaum is assistant professor at the University of Münster. Manuel Reppmann is assistant professor at the University of Hamburg. Laura Marie Edinger-Schons is professor for sustainable business at the University of Hamburg. Johann Nils Foege is professor for management at the University of Münster.

References

1. M. Reppmann, F. Maibaum, L.M. Edinger-Schons, et al., “Talk, but Don’t Talk Too Much: How Corporate Sustainability Communication Evokes Stepwise Organizational Change,” Journal of Business Research 189 (February 2025): 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115188.

More Like This