Outfinity is envisioned as a pioneering research project exploring the dynamic intersection of blockchain technology, decentralised branding, and social empowerment. This project emerges as a response to the complexities and exaggerations of the global financial system and the crypto ecosystems inspired by Bitcoin. Its core objective is to transform the often critiqued elements of greed and the desire for easy gain, prevalent in the current financial and crypto landscapes, into forces that drive positive social change.
Cryptocurrencies are complementary currencies.
The blockchain revolution will achieve its goal only if every city, every region, every company or every group of founders (entrepreneurs, social entrepreneurs) can properly finance socially useful projects and organise and make their activity transparent through blockchains, tokens/coins, and smart contracts. Each of these projects will be created specifically for their purpose and interests. But can a community have its own money? If we consider the words of economist Edwin Clarence Riegel, the answer is an encouraging yes. The American scholar writes in his 1944 book, titled Private Enterprise Money that: “We need not petition Congress, and we need not waste time to denounce bankers, for they can neither help nor hinder our natural right to extend credit to each other, and this is the perfect basis for a money system.”
The idea of communities having their currencies and taking local economies into their own hands is bold. We are accustomed to using “real” money for exchange, and the fact is that we will always have traditional money in some form. But an ideal scenario would be one where we had reduced or even eliminated the problems with conventional currencies.
We usually think of money when it comes to their creation and guarantees in terms of national governments. It is a fact that more than 97% of all currencies are created when banks loan to governments, businesses, or individuals. From a historical perspective, there are multiple ways and forms in which there have been. Numerous historical examples already exist regarding local currency money circulating within a community. Most of these currencies appeared when times were hard economically and official currencies were in short supply. We don’t have to look way back into the past. We must recognise that these ideas seem to have little traction under the influence of the national states. However, this could change quickly under the influence of Artificial intelligence-based technologies.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Figure 1 highlights a well-known system theory result: the inherent conflict between efficiency and resilience. Systems (ecosystems but also human systems) are subject to these rules of complex systems. Outfinity wants to contribute to the evolution of greater decentralisation to strengthen resilience and perfect the existing social systems. A natural, organic evolution is still possible, and a violent revolution is still avoidable. In general, revolutions manage to unload social tensions. Still, history shows us that the new system tends only to change the elites but not the deep problems related to human nature, the competition for the accumulation of resources and power.
Crises in multiple domains (finance, energy, food, environment) have generated the need for different development models and safer solutions. Outfinity project flows from the ideas of Bernard Lietaer and other scholars of complementary currencies and uses the technological revolution represented by blockchain technology. According to Bernard Lietaer and Gwendolyn Hallsmith, most crypto coins can be classified as complementary currencies, although most financial authorities do not recognise them. The truth is that the gap between traditional economic ideology and market trends is hard to miss. Cryptocurrencies have already become complementary currencies, and their influence on economies will become more important as time passes.
In Figure 2, we classify the existence of two major types of money and highlight that FIAT money and coins from the BTC ecosystem want to become general-purpose money. Therefore, we label them blue money (they want to conquer the blue sky). Alternatively, the complementary currencies are green because they remind us of ecosystems and life. The Outfinity whitepaper proposes a blue crypto token, but it Is solely created to nurture green tokens that can help major social causes and local communities. We use the term “empire” as a metaphor for a big concentration of power, including state-backed power and power concentration of private corporations.
Money is one of the most important sources of motivation in people’s lives, and we do not intend to reduce the pleasure for life and gain of anyone else. On the contrary, it is opportune to create alternative monetary systems that increase people’s motivation for beneficial action. The most effective fight against something you don’t like or consider harmful is participating in a system of ideas and organisation that benefits you. Of course, when adherents of other systems of organisation and ideology try to reduce somebody’s freedom, we can speak of enslavement and a violent reaction against these reductions of economic or social freedoms is justified. Statistically, the greatest danger to most of us is the empires controlled by those who want infinite power. Unfortunately, these empires are often useful, and our rational goal should not be to destroy them but to obtain a mutually beneficial balance between their power and our freedom. An alternative simple and realistic solution does not exist.
We should understand that any vision of powerful local communities is impossible without their membership in states strong enough to enforce enough rules that prevent local tribes from fighting each other in socially unacceptable ways (with the implicit goal of becoming new empires). Finding this balance between regional small powers (directly representing the needs of real people) and central powers (metaphorically called empires in this document) is part of the challenges of the future.
Still, we must create technical technologies (evolutions in blockchain technologies) and social technologies (ways of organising and cooperating with future projects, cooperatives or companies) that will bring humanity near a better outcome than the existing state of affairs. Of course, trying to block history and believing we can prevent the destruction and emergence of new empires doesn’t make sense. Still, we can at least try to put deep cultural boundaries on how these empires can use their power over local communities and individuals.
Bitcoin as Just an Educational Step
FIAT currencies are far too focused on the efficiency and control of elites over society, so it is no coincidence that the current system periodically goes through major crises that negatively affect the lives of billions of people. Bitcoin cryptocurrency succeeded because of its gut reaction to the central banking system and unrestricted printing of money. Mostly associated with the libertarian worldview of personal independence and power, the Bitcoin ecosystem was very good for educating people about money monoculture. However, the ecosystem got trapped in enrichment races without social meaning. In general, the libertarian way of thinking promotes extreme individualistic values incompatible with the reality of balanced collaboration between autonomous individuals. Returning to a new kind of digital feudalism is already a threat because of the large corporations, and it is our obligation and need for citizens to understand the social risks of neglecting the role of belonging to strong and socio-economically healthy communities. The libertarian ideas serve ideas that lead to a dystopian society and should be opposed. We recognise that various crypto projects have made important contributions to the development of blockchain technologies. Still, from a social point of view, the impact of these projects can only be major with a major ideological shift. Pump and dump schemes and lack of real utility are a scourge for all cryptocurrencies in the Blockchain ecosystem (in one form or another). They are threatening the evolution towards the existence of viable alternative currency systems that could help humanity build societies that can survive long term.
We recognise that in human nature, there is a strong inclination to accumulate power and wealth. Still, we know that in the face of the statistical impossibility of becoming emperors of huge empires, there is a huge thirst for autonomy, independence and justice that cannot be fooled indefinitely. Over the centuries, this desire for fairness has always emerged as a reaction to the actions of the dominant elites. Blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies are such a dramatic innovation of social technology that simultaneously threatens the current elites but can also offer a viable alternative to maintain and develop what has changed for the better in recent centuries.
Technological development offers opportunities for current elites to maintain their power and a positive social role while reducing their negative contribution to suffering and frustrations related to inequality of opportunity for most people in the current societies.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
For young people, big cities and empires offer an interesting environment and opportunities for learning and human evolution. However, with experience and maturity, people need safer environments to raise their children and provide their experience/wisdom to the world.
We can consider Bitcoin, a school about the nature of money and the potential of decentralisation. In that case, we can already imagine a world in which graduates can build a world that benefits from these opportunities. As we said in the introduction, our vision is not to destroy empires (large corporations or states) but to tame them to provide a place for learning and innovation engines for young people and a safety net for mature citizens. We envision decentralisation as a way of creating cooperatives, small companies, and local communities that share means of production, land, and real estate without the generalised insecurity that is characteristic and an inevitable byproduct of the functioning of the hypercompetitive leaders of the empires.
Changing the world is the occupation of the fools and the wise people. Let’s aim to attract enough smart people that using decentralisation tools could tune the world slowly to become a better place.
Acceleration of history. Moloch The God of Arbitrage
In this chapter, we aim to articulate the multifaceted challenges presently confronting humanity, interwoven in a manner that perpetuates a feedback loop of escalating complexity.
It was hypothesized that the proliferation of social networks may be catalyzing a heightened focus on self, individualism, and the transformation of gender roles, potentially imparting significant implications on societal structures at large.
Simultaneously, economic elements such as the intensification of inequality act as catalysts, eroding the fabric of social cohesion and trust. The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is anticipated to transition the majority into a precarious social class known as ‘the precariat’, characterized by a lack of substantive ownership and autonomy, relegated to competing for minimal resources within a hostile, dehumanized economic milieu. This burgeoning precariat class, coupled with the looming prospect of AI usurping human labour, is expected to ignite societal unrest and increase volatility, here understood as an acceleration of pivotal historical events. Such volatility is further compounded by diminishing faith in democratic institutions and the incumbent elites.
Moreover, elite overproduction is posited as a harbinger of impending instability. A bifurcation is envisaged, where an increasing centralization of power resides with elites managing artificial intelligence concurrently with a diminishing human role in leadership, management, and employment. This is juxtaposed against a growing cadre of skilled individuals pursuing purpose. Those feeling marginalized may gravitate towards the dismantling of the existing system.
Reflecting on historical precedents such as fascism and communism, it is discerned that revolutions, often spearheaded by idealistic yet egocentric and inexperienced youth, typically do not bode well for humanity. This is particularly alarming in an era armed with nuclear and biological weaponry and potentially AI entities of immense power.
Consequently, we cannot overlook civilization-level existential risks, such as the potential for an AI singularity, which raises profound questions about the future of humanity, alongside the impending threat of climate change with its global ramifications.
Throughout history, political, cultural, or intellectual elites, including ourselves in the academic sphere, stand to lose more if societal stability unravels and revolutions, driven by irrational or desperate actors, commence. There appears to be a tangible but under-addressed risk, possibly due to the complacency of the intellectual elites who currently benefit from and are reluctant to disrupt the comfortable status quo. It is imperative to underscore that these issues are interrelated, each amplifying the impact of the others, fostering a perception of accelerated historical events. Our objective should be to decelerate this acceleration without impeding the evolution of technology and progress. We ought to devise solutions that instil hope for the future by forging paths towards inclusiveness and equitable distribution of the fruits of scientific advancements.
The “Moloch’s Race” metaphor aptly symbolizes the quandary where actions contradict long-term interests in favour of immediate satisfaction. This metaphor envisages a scenario where victory ultimately leads to loss, an apparent contradiction yet reflective of our current systemic predicament.
Anomalies like designed obsolescence, excessive production, and the squandering of resources mark our economic framework. Concurrently, we witness a rise in speculative ventures and unproductive rivalry, eroding the fabric of social trust. These elements prioritize efficiency over resilience, making us susceptible to future adversities.
This situation is further exacerbated by an excessive reliance on technological and scientific solutions, sometimes veering towards “dataism”, as termed by Yuval Noah Harari, and a tendency towards scientism, which might border on pseudoscience rather than genuine scientific inquiry. Such tendencies often overshadow the essential role of wisdom in dealing with a complex world.
Social network platforms are seemingly engineered to capitalize on our primal emotions — from pride to envy, greed to lust, and outrage to wrath, even encouraging laziness and superficiality. This exploitation fosters a pursuit of immediate gratification at the expense of our long-term well-being.
To break free from “Moloch’s Race,” focusing on long-term benefits necessitating discipline, concerted effort, and purposeful action is imperative. We must choose paths that will be lauded by our future selves and society today.
Moloch’s influence primarily derives from prevalent beliefs surrounding the concept of arbitrage, often encapsulated in axioms like “Arbitrage is desirable,” “Arbitrage is inevitable,” “Everyone has a price,” or the belief that everything can be quantified uniformly, often in monetary terms. Such notions propagate the fallacy that wealth is the sole indicator of social contribution.
In economics, arbitrage refers to capitalizing on price discrepancies across different markets for profit. Extrapolating to societal contexts implies exploiting imbalances for various gains, whether in politics, social interactions, or other domains. Essentially, arbitrage is leveraging disparities to accumulate multiple forms of value, financial, social, or political.
Regrettably, this “God of Arbitrage” mentality thrives on a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of money or currencies. Economist Bernard Lietaer extensively discusses the balance between Yang and Yin money, suggesting a spectrum of possibilities. However, our society appears fixated on a singular currency type, predominantly focused on yang money, which is conducive to arbitrage. Both fiat and decentralized cryptocurrencies are specially designed to capitalize on arbitrage opportunities in commerce, investment, or quick wealth accumulation schemes. This fixation stems from a limited understanding of the multifaceted nature of money and the potential of combining yang and yin aspects of money in diverse combinations.
Despite this, there is reason for optimism. While arbitrage may underpin issues like uniformity, leading to systemic vulnerability, corruption, exploitation, and resource concentration, it also presents an opportunity for “creative” power concentration, including self-destructive creativity.
Technological advancements, especially in decentralized technologies and Artificial Intelligence, offer promising avenues to navigate a complex world characterized by numerous “currencies,” each representing distinct forms of value and social contributions. With deliberate and purposeful actions, we can mitigate the effects of arbitrage, potentially decelerating volatility and the pace of history.
Thus, while Moloch’s influence is significant, it is not insurmountable. We possess the capabilities and resources to challenge Moloch’s dominance and reshape our collective narrative.
Decentralised Brands as Social Technology
Rewriting the past or guessing the future are both interesting and risky activities. However, we risk a bit, and we will say that organising people to achieve common goals is a social technology. More than the technologies based on hard sciences, social technologies (human nature science) greatly impact people and their lifestyles. Organising individuals into larger groups of related families later united by common religious beliefs in kingdoms and empires could be considered the first generation of social technologies capable of building strong brands.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Capitalism and the technologies resulting from modern science have tried to tame the problems of tribalism and the creation of social consensus based on religious beliefs. To this end, we can observe, in recent centuries, a certain pressure to destroy tribalism of any kind on behalf of the nation-states and reduce the influence of the local communities. This socio-economic pressure determines the migration of people to cities. Unfortunately, cities tend to have less connected communities than traditional agricultural communities. The revolution of individualism is also beneficial for capitalism in terms of control over human resources and the development of consumption. Initially, the Internet offered a vision of liberation from intermediaries and transforming individuals into more autonomous economic agents. However, the reality of recent decades shows us that large technology companies are the most advantaged by internet technologies. One of the main causes is the inability of the human mind to remember too many brands. The present (in 2023) looks like we are going to a dystopian future where privacy is weakened, and most of us will work in one way or another for our techno-feudal masters. The state’s monopoly on money can also characterise the modern age. The advent of Bitcoin (and blockchain technologies) has shown that this monopoly can be challenged. Blockchain innovations such as DAO and smart contracts are still incapable of influencing society profoundly, being in the stage of profitable experiments for a small group of pioneers.
In our efforts to understand the potential of the blockchain, we realised that one of the main sources of value in the current world is the brand itself. Many cryptocurrencies offer virtually no benefit (they even consume much energy and human effort to maintain the systems online) but manage to bring value to certain people due to their carefully developed brand. For this reason, the initial name of Outfinity was BrandCoin. Still, we decided to go with Outfinity because this is an attempt to boot a new type of social technology, and the main characteristic of social technologies is their huge capacity for outgrowing scarce (finite) resources into real wealth for many people. Ultimately, the only source of real wealth is the benefits of the social technologies deployed for our good at the level of society.
Of course, the benefits of this collaboration due to social technologies are not evenly distributed (a concept quite difficult to define anyway), but achieving stable long-term prosperity and solving the challenges facing humanity requires deploying social technologies to empower as many people as possible. There are no guarantees, but a society in which many people get a good life (they can develop according to their biological and social needs properly) is a society in which the forces that fight to conserve that lifestyle can mitigate the social, technical, ecological and even cosmic challenges (that inevitable are part of any future). A society with an overly strong (and very small in numbers) elite that leads a vast majority that is dissatisfied and unable/unwilling to contribute with solutions will self-destruct in one way or another.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Outfinity proposes a model for developing new types of social technologies that claim to catalyse the transformation of decentralised communities into communities with direct socioeconomic benefits for their members.
Outfinity offers a solution (perhaps the only one that can be imagined) for taming the excesses of capitalism and reducing the dangers to our freedom due to new information technologies. We are not alone; there are various initiatives and projects, but until now, they all have yet to deliver a serious change, maybe because they are focused more on destroying the system and less on creating appealing alternatives.
A post-capitalism evolution requires serious technological advancements, like Artificial intelligence, to enable different incentives for work and better lifestyles. The system should be perfected, and increased resilience should be sustained, but returning to traditional tribalism or strong isolationism makes little sense. The benefits of large-scale trade could be better for such isolationist efforts to have any chances of success.
Outfinity aims to create a strong, rewarding mechanism for those projects and communities capable of self-organising to benefit the whole world or reduce societal pressure by providing proper safety nets for the local members.
In this sense, we imagine the creation of an ecosystem with crypto tokens capable of giving significant economic rewards to the creators of successful open-source projects, creators of shared knowledge and content, and the organisers of successful movements solving social causes (decentralised communities).
Ultimately, all these projects/causes are powerful brands and can benefit from the crypto-tokens mechanism of extracting value from brands. Although this value extraction from brands could easily resemble Ponzi schemes (as seen with cryptocurrencies), the value brought socially justifies the existence of such tokens. Outfinity will try to create protection mechanisms against using these tokens in immoral ways. The initial investors will benefit more significantly (to start the mechanisms), and the subsequent investors will be able to preserve their wealth through strong and socially healthy brands (used as social credit insurance mechanisms). The projects must impact as many people as possible and offer them good and sustainable lifestyles. After the development of strong decentralised communities, we believe that it is possible to address the more complicated problem of developing brands capable of offering a new life in the form of local communities, cooperatives, or strong international (but decentralised) brands created by large consortiums of small and independent companies legally incorporated in many regions of the world but working under the same brand.
Outfinity: A Social Laboratory for Research of Decentralized Brands
Brands are not just marketing gimmicks but essential tools that help us navigate social complexity. Brands serve as heuristics or shortcuts for decision-making in a Reality that’s too complex for us to understand fully.
Interestingly, we already see signs that the world is evolving towards something we coined “Decentralised Brands”. Consider open-source projects as early examples of decentralised brands driven by community contributions rather than centralised authority. Similarly, cryptocurrency systems like Bitcoin and Ethereum are decentralised brands that operate on blockchain technology.
Online communities, too, are emerging as decentralised brands. They are self-governed spaces where people unite based on shared interests or goals. Furthermore, we’re witnessing the rise of decentralised digital ecosystems that leverage technologies like blockchain and AI for governance.
So, what’s the definition of a decentralised brand? For our research group and articles, decentralised brands can be considered organisations or Ecosystems controlled by independent stakeholders. These organisations, whether online or offline, must utilise technologies like the Internet, social networks, blockchain, and AI for governance.
Most human organisations are essentially brands, and there’s a growing potential for these to evolve into decentralised brands. This shift could be a game-changer in organising society and tackling the challenges.
Today’s dominant governance models are mainly centralised, whether around strict hierarchies or majority decisions. Although alternative models exist, such as holacracy and DAO (decentralised autonomous organisation) focused governance, their influence remains reduced.
We don’t advocate for entirely replacing current governance models. My emphasis is on boosting resilience by larger adoption of ‘decentralised brand’ principles, harnessing AI and blockchain opportunities. This will counterbalance large corporations and state government powers and foster new values-driven collaboration types that are impossible without blockchain and AI assistance.
Decentralised brand governance aims to offer flexible alternatives to traditional models. It champions systems one can leave if they no longer resonate on the level of values and behaviour.
This article champions research and exploration. Instead of a singular ‘ideal’ future, we should aim for a diverse array of decentralised brands, collaborating and competing, all contributing to a fulfilling human experience.
Drawing inspiration from William Gibson’s words, “The future is already here, but it’s not evenly distributed,” let’s set up experiments to distribute it more equitably and wisely. Our objective is to moderate the pace of history for the safety of our civilisation and drive a transformation that encompasses everyone, including the political and economic elites.
Let’s clarify: billionaires and successful elites can play positive roles, like offering success models for young people. However, it’s our shared responsibility to stop elites from getting caught up in Moloch’s games.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
It is time to go deeper into the solution part. The only solution to create innovative governance technologies lies in starting many research projects around decentralised governance. These projects potentially strongly impact the real aspects of people’s lives. Think of these as Social Research Laboratories. In my opinion, the Decentralized Social Networks provide an ideal setting for such large-scale experiments.
This article is based on the idea that future research projects should create a set of experimental Decentralized Social Networks that incorporate antibodies against Arbitrage and Moloch into their nature. Technologies are not politically neutral; therefore, it is crucial to have tens or hundreds of such experiments mature to the level of adoption by local communities, decentralised brand-based businesses, or even public authorities in a later phase.
Why are Decentralized Social Networks the most appropriate places to start?
We answer that they offer the most accessible strategy to bring ideas and technologies from DTEs, Decentralised brands, or socially beneficial cryptosystems to the masses. These networks can serve as testing grounds for new forms of governance, economic incentives, and social interaction. The future of Decentralized Social Networks should be rich and multifaceted, incorporating financial incentives, local currencies, and even “decentralised brand” currencies. Crowdfunding mechanisms should also be important (vote with your money or wallet). However, the success of these initiatives will hinge on the alignment of local communities, large non-governmental organisations, and even states and public authorities toward successful research results in these areas. I want to end my presentation with this thought: The potential in this domain is so vast that it could keep humanity busy exploring the possibilities for hundreds, if not thousands, of years.
We are beginning a new era that promises to solve some of our most pressing challenges through innovative and inclusive solutions. As always in the past, the major challenge for humanity in the future is to create good governance technologies.
Governance is a social technology that can benefit from the evolution of other technologies. These governance technologies MUST aim to slow down the speed of history sufficiently to provide humanity with opportunities for safe exploration. They MUST offer time to enjoy the results of science and technology.
This article calls for research collaborations on new initiatives that can reshape our understanding of decentralised brand governance. Specifically, I invite you to consider contributing to projects creating DTEs, Decentralized Governance Experiments using Blockchain & AI, and Decentralised Social Network initiatives.
Many of these could be built, starting with innovative Decentralized Social Networks that can bring the relevant stakeholders together. These platforms can act as genuine social research laboratories, providing real-world testing grounds for new social and economic interaction forms. In conclusion, I strongly believe that the future is not set in stone; it’s a canvas waiting for us to paint it.
Let’s seize this opportunity to collaborate, innovate, and build a future that benefits humanity. Thank you for your time and attention to this part of the article. I look forward to potential collaborations and an enriching journey ahead!
Executive Summary & Conclusions
Outfinity is an innovative research project delving into blockchain technology and decentralised branding to foster social empowerment. This initiative is a creative response to the challenges of the global financial and crypto ecosystems, aiming to redirect the pursuit of personal gain towards supporting meaningful social causes. Outfinity distinguishes itself by pioneering an ecosystem of crypto tokens designed to incentivise positive social involvement while proposing new methods for determining token value. At its core, Outfinity is about empowering communities through decentralisation, creating a Decentralised Social Network for creators and social technology innovators in areas of Decentralised Brands, and harmonising the concepts of general-purpose and complementary currencies. It builds on the educational groundwork laid by Bitcoin and other technologies, advancing towards a future where decentralised communities balance individual freedom with collective welfare. The essence of Outfinity lies in its commitment to using the power of branding and community-driven initiatives to forge a more equitable and sustainable future, demonstrating how technological innovation can be harnessed for social good.
In conclusion, the Outfinity project stands at the forefront of an exploration that intersects blockchain technology, decentralised branding, and the empowerment of social structures. This initiative emerges as a strategic response to the complexities inherent in the global financial system and the crypto ecosystem, particularly those inspired by Bitcoin. Outfinity’s fundamental aim is to channel the prevalent pursuits of personal gain and the inherent greed within the financial and crypto spheres towards fostering constructive social change.
Outfinity looks at cryptocurrencies as complementary to existing monetary systems. Drawing on the insights of economist Edwin Clarence Riegel, Outfinity supports the concept of community-driven currencies but extends to virtual communities, consortiums and other types of organisations made possible by technology. This approach challenges traditional financial norms and aligns with the historical precedent of local currencies emerging in economically challenging times.
Outfinity aims to enhance system resilience and offer alternative development models in response to multifaceted crises, thus steering clear of potentially destructive revolutions. The project draws inspiration from Bernard Lietaer’s work on complementary currencies, utilizing blockchain technology to bridge conventional economic ideologies and evolving market trends.
The initiative delineates a distinction between general-purpose money, termed ‘blue money’, and complementary currencies, referred to as ‘green money’. The goal is to develop a symbiotic relationship where blue crypto tokens nurture green tokens. These green tokens are envisioned as catalysts for supporting major social causes and empowering local communities.
Furthermore, Outfinity envisions decentralised brands as pivotal social technologies. It critiques current capitalist dynamics and underscores the potential of blockchain to disrupt state-controlled monetary systems. The project foresees a future where human organizations evolve into decentralised brands, reshaping societal organisations and addressing contemporary challenges.
As a social laboratory for decentralized brands, Outfinity is not just an academic or theoretical exercise but a practical endeavour. It seeks to explore the nuances of decentralized governance, leveraging AI and blockchain to foster novel types of collaboration. This approach is anticipated to counterbalance the influence of large corporations and state entities, promoting values-driven collaborations intricately linked with blockchain and AI technologies.
In essence, Outfinity is committed to empowering communities through decentralized financial mechanisms. It aims to create a Decentralized Social Network as a hub for creators and innovators in Decentralized Brands. By harmonizing the ideas of general-purpose and complementary currencies, Outfinity builds on the educational foundation laid by Bitcoin and similar technologies, moving towards a future where decentralised communities find a balance between individual liberty and collective well-being.
Contact:
Contact us at “outfinity@axiologic.net” if you are an entrepreneur or enthusiast (developer, technical writer, etc) and want to engage us in more concrete actions. We are open to partnerships or other forms of collaboration.