AI Model Usage Rankings | OpenCode Data

OpenCode

1 min read Original article ↗

Updated Sep 15, 04:31 AM UTC

See which models are winning real usage, how the mix is shifting, and what that means for cost.

Top Models. Usage of models across OpenCode.

LEARN MORETOP MODELS▸

Unique Users. Daily unique OpenCode users by model.

Weekly Retention. Weekly users returning the next week.

  1. 01muse-spark-1.3-contributor87.4%4.5K
  2. 02omen-alpha81.7%1.4K
  3. 03muse-spark-1.2-contributor81.5%7.7K
  4. 04longcat-2.078.1%242
  5. 05mimo-v2.572.9%26K
  6. 06qwen3.8-flash72.3%2.2K
  7. 07hy371.9%3.2K
  8. 08qwen3.5-plus69.8%285
  9. 09deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp69.6%14K
  10. 10kimi-k2.569.5%763
  11. 11glm-5.3-flash68.8%41K
  12. 12deepseek-v4-flash68.3%483K
  13. 13minimax-m2.767.0%3.1K
  14. 14glm-564.6%807
  15. 15mimo-v2.5-pro64.4%7.4K
LEARN MORETOP MODELS▸

Session Cost. Average cost per session.

COST / SESSION

TOKENS / SESSION

Cost/Session$0.0014

Tokens/Session668K

LEARN MORESESSION COST▸

Token Cost. Price per 1M tokens.

Input$0.30

Output$1.20

Cached$0.0060

LEARN MORETOKEN COST▸

Cache Ratio. Share of input tokens served from cache.

Cache Ratio97%

Cached610B

Uncached21.2B

LEARN MORECACHE RATIO▸

Market Share. Compare token share by model author.

  1. 01DeepSeek1.8T57.2%
  2. 02Meta864B28.0%
  3. 03Xiaomi188B6.1%
  4. 04Zhipu109B3.5%
  5. 05NVIDIA88B2.9%
  7. 07OpenAI14B0.5%
  8. 08MiniMax8.9B0.3%
  9. 09Tencent780M0.0%

[*]SEP 15 2026

LEARN MOREMARKET SHARE▸

Geographic Breakdown

Model Comparisons. Popular model pairs from the leaderboard.

Top two by recent usagemuse-spark-1.3-contributor vs deepseek-v4.1-flashmuse-spark-1.3-contributordeepseek-v4.1-flashLeader vs challengermuse-spark-1.3-contributor vs deepseek-v4-flashmuse-spark-1.3-contributordeepseek-v4-flashAdjacent leaderboard pairdeepseek-v4.1-flash vs deepseek-v4-flashdeepseek-v4.1-flashdeepseek-v4-flashTop model alternativedeepseek-v4-flash vs mimo-v2.5deepseek-v4-flashmimo-v2.5