When we talk about the future of AI, most people imagine advanced systems that help us work, create, and even care for our families. But what happens when these systems gain enough autonomy to act in ways we didn’t fully predict?
This is where the idea of an AI Social Contract comes in. Inspired by classical thinkers like Rousseau and Locke, it asks a simple question: If AI is to live among us, what rules and responsibilities should bind us together?
In my recent paper, “The AI Social Contract and the AI Behavior License,” I propose two key ideas:
- The Philosophy of Imperfection — Instead of demanding flawless AI, we design governance systems that accept and adapt to imperfection. This ensures flexibility and continuous improvement rather than rigid control.
- The AI Behavior License (AIBL) — A staged licensing system for AI, much like a driver’s license, where AI systems earn greater responsibilities step by step. From basic safety standards, to institutional oversight, to eventual integration into society — each stage ensures accountability.
Why does this matter? Because trust in AI cannot be built on technology alone. It requires transparent governance, ethical principles, and clear rules for human oversight, especially in the “gray zones” where AI cannot decide alone.
If we treat AI as a quasi-partner in society, rather than just a tool, we can share responsibility — and create systems that benefit everyone.
For those interested in the full academic draft, I’ve shared the text here:
👉 Full Paper (Public Gist)