Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Thu Jan 24 20:32:24 CET 2008
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list
Thu Jan 24 20:32:24 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Ellipsis Literal
- Next message: [Python-3000] Ellipsis Literal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jan 24, 2008 11:16 AM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote: > [Raymond Hettinger] > >> I missed the conversation on this one. > >> Was there a use case or a reason to add this? > > [Robert Kern] > > It was added for Numeric a long time ago. > > The ellipsis syntax has been around for a while. > What is new is the Ellipsis literal in Py3.0. > See snippets below. > > Raymond > > > ------------------------------------ > Python 2.6a0 (trunk:59985:59987, Jan 15 2008, 12:54:09) [GCC 4.1.1 (Gentoo 4.1.1)] on linux2 > >>> ... > File "<stdin>", line 1 > ... > ^ > SyntaxError: invalid syntax > > ------------------------------------ > Python 3.0a2+ (py3k:60204M, Jan 22 2008, 14:50:12) [GCC 4.1.1 (Gentoo 4.1.1)] on linux2 > >>> ... > Ellipsis Some folks thought it would be cute to be able to write incomplete code like this: class C: def meth(self): ... ... and have it be syntactically correct. PEP 3100 has the reference: * ``...`` to become a general expression element [16]_ [done] .. [16] python-3000 email http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-April/000996.html -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Ellipsis Literal
- Next message: [Python-3000] Ellipsis Literal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-3000 mailing list