[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
| From: | Eli Zaretskii |
| Subject: | Re: Android port |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Aug 2023 09:27:39 +0300 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> > Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 12:12:26 +0800 > > No consensus was built the previous time we debated whether to include > this code or not, but with Emacs 29.1 out the door and master relatively > calm, I would like to revisit this subject. There's no need to revisit, from where I stand. It is quite clear this community as a whole thinks that having the port as part of Emacs is more important than the potential difficulties and issues it could create. > Also, would someone ascertain if the branch still builds on MS Windows, > after the past few updates from Gnulib? Once Someone™ confirms that the MinGW and NS builds work on that branch, you can go ahead and land the branch on master. (But please be sure to make a proper log message naming all the new files and changes in existing ones, when you merge.) And a huge thanks for working on this port.
- Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Angelo Graziosi, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/04
- Re: Android port,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Prev by Date: Re: [External] : Re: Question about eval and compile-command
- Next by Date: Re: Android port
- Previous by thread: Android port
- Next by thread: Re: Android port
- Index(es):