How I Used GenAI to Rapidly Prototype MaestroML (and Why FastAPI Won)

3 min read Original article ↗

Four months ago, MaestroML was an idea scribbled in notes: “enterprise-grade forecasting, simple API, finance-friendly, integrates with Microsoft Power Platform.” Today, it’s a live, production-ready API. One of the biggest accelerators along the way? GenAI: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and Gemini AI.

Let me be clear upfront: GenAI didn’t build MaestroML for me. But it dramatically compressed the time it took to move from concept → architecture → working prototype. Go lean startup, GO!

Step 0: Ideation and MVP

After completing a consulting engagement, I went back to the lab with concerns the client expressed. Could they move some processes from efficient (meets SLAs) to predictive? I did a “weekend project” and shared the demo with the client to get immediate feedback. It was a web-based app that took a CSV file with Sales figures and generated a forecast 3 periods ahead, a MatPlotLib chart, a table, and Excel file output. Tech stack: LAMP stack + Python hosted on a Google Cloud vm.

Step 1: Rapid prototyping the idea

I used GenAI as a technical sparring partner to pressure-test the core concept:

What’s the minimal viable API for time-series forecasting?

What inputs would finance, accounting, and ops teams actually tolerate?

How do we return results that are useful, not academic?

Within weeks, I had a clear API concept, JSON schema, and a working proof-of-concept. That alone could take months of defining requirements and back-and-forth amongst SMEs and stakeholders.

Step 2: Evaluating platforms (without analysis paralysis)

Next came platform decisions. I explored multiple technologies leveraging Python, the go-to language for AI and ML:

  • FastAPI

  • Flask

  • Django

GenAI helped me evaluate each option against real-world constraints:

  • Speed to market

  • Enterprise security compatibility

  • Documentation quality

  • Extensibility for future ML models

  • Marketplace readiness (RapidAPI, Microsoft Power Platform, etc.)

The conclusion kept pointing to the same answer.

Step 3: Why I chose FastAPI

FastAPI wasn’t just the “popular” choice — it was the correct one for MaestroML. I skipped building different options and comparing. I started building with FastAPI and never looked back.

FastAPI gave me:

  • Strong typing with Pydantic (huge for data integrity)

  • Automatic OpenAPI / Swagger docs (critical for adoption)

  • Async performance for scale

  • Clean separation between models, logic, and routes

  • Enterprise-friendly authentication patterns

GenAI accelerated the learning curve — helping validate architectural patterns, debug edge cases, and think ahead about scaling, rate limiting, and security.

Step 4: Getting it done

The real value wasn’t code generation. It was momentum and accuracy.

Instead of getting stuck:

I shipped a working API

Deployed it behind Apache on Google Cloud

Integrated authentication

Published documentation

Launched on RapidAPI

Began enterprise conversations

GenAI acted like a tireless senior engineer who never minded one more “what if…” question.

Final takeaway

AI doesn’t replace engineering judgment — but it amplifies it. If you already understand systems, data, and business context, tools like GenAI can help you move from idea to execution faster than ever before. MaestroML exists today because I stopped waiting for “perfect” and started building — with the right tools, the right architecture, and a lot of focused iteration.

Execution still wins. GenAI is a force multiplier — not a shortcut. With strong coding fundamentals, execution speed explodes.

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?