What Do the Next 4,000 Emoji Look Like?

Β· Did Someone Say Emoji? Β·

6 min read Original article β†—

There are only so many times you can scroll past an πŸ«€, 🦑, πŸ«”, πŸ›΄, and a πŸͺ just to locate a πŸ† emoji before you give up and settle for β€œnice job”.

Right now, buried in our phones, sits a library of nearly four thousand tiny drawings. And yet it feels like not enough. Every year, more requests are filed for more objects, more animals, more more. If this is what four thousand emoji looks like, what are the next four thousand supposed to be?

Fortunately, thousands of years of writing systems walked πŸšΆβ€βž‘οΈso emoji could run πŸƒβ€βž‘οΈ. From clay slabs to touchscreens, human communication seems to follow a pattern. We start by cataloging physical objects because our brains can’t remember thirty crates of barley. Then we run out of room, panic, and stretch those pictures into metaphors. Before long, nouns aren't enough so we twist the images into mood, tone, and full-blown grammar.

πŸ‘€ Sound πŸ‘€ familiar πŸ‘€ ? πŸ‘€

In 3200 BCE Mesopotamia, scribes weren't pressing reeds into mud to compose love letters or dirty jokes (yet); they were shaping clay tokens to take inventory of sheep and beer jugs to prove nobody stole a cow en route to Uruk.

Five millennia later, we faced a similar situation on mobile screens in 1999. The original 176 emoji1 were less an emotional experiment than bandwidth conservation. A sun, a train, a coffee cup: instant shorthand for the late-nineties commuter to say the day had started, they were on the train, and they needed to grab a drink. πŸŒžπŸš†β˜•

Then, when the Unicode Consortium standardized emoji in 2010, the list didn't stop there. Instead, people asked, β€œWhat’s missing?”

Don’t have a burrito? Add a burrito 🌯.

Don’t have a microscope? Add a microscope πŸ”¬.

Don’t forget about hedgehogs πŸ¦”.

Early on, encoding included a loaf 🍞, a baguette πŸ₯–, a croissant πŸ₯, and a pretzel πŸ₯¨. Notably, once an emoji enters Unicode, it never gets removed, so we continued to carb load but the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another.

Webdings and wingdings - EduTech Wiki
My childhood favorite, Wingdings

Humans are myth-makers, and our instinct to tell stories runs wild in this next phase. Scribes in Sumer and Egypt broke this noun logjam by repurposing glyphs for abstract concepts. In Sumerian, an arrow stood for β€œti”, which also happened to mean β€˜life.’ Egyptian scribes pulled the same trick with a sun. It started as literal sunshine, then stretched into β€˜day,’ then just β€˜time’ itself.

Millennia later, we run the exact same play in our group chats. We aren’t seeing an increase in the skull πŸ’€ emoji because we are freaks for True Crime podcasts. We’re dying of laughter. We aren’t dropping clown 🀑 emoji because Barnum & Bailey is in town. As for the eggplant πŸ† and the peach πŸ‘? Nobody is buying groceries with these emoji.

Egypt | British Museum
The British Museum / Exhibition: Hieroglyphs: unlocking ancient Egypt (October 2022).

Eventually, writing systems organize ambiguity. Egyptian scribes appended determinatives, silent classifier glyphs that were never pronounced aloud, to tell the reader which conceptual category the word belonged to. Walking legs (π“‚») meant movement; a seated woman (𓁐) indicated female names.

Emoji are our modern equivalents. They sit at the edges of our sentences to establish tone and clarify our intent. Take a sentence as volatile as "I'm going to kill you." Standalone, I’m calling 9-1-1. Tack on a loudly of ryongface like, β€œI'm going to kill you πŸ˜­β€ and now we’re both laughing. Add a wink πŸ˜‰ and blood rushes to my face, you flirt. One tiny pictograph completely changes the legal classification of the message.

We treat them like volume knobs, stacking flames to crank up the heat (πŸ”₯ vs.πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯) and we reach for messy, hard-to-name gut feelings like Melting Face (🫠), Saluting Face (🫑), or Holding Back Tears (πŸ₯Ή) because words … fail me.

Smarthistory – The Inka khipu
Incan Khipu (Knotted Textile Accounting) Source

When someone drops πŸ’€ under a video, your brain doesn’t sound out s-k-u-l-l. Depending on the context, you might think, β€œI’m dead,” β€œunhinged,” or simply a silent, physical exhale of amusement. It dumps the meaning straight into your skull. How do you pronounce these in your head? As words … or as tone?

You are amazing πŸ”₯ β†’ Sincere hype.

You are amazing πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ β†’ With great enthusiasm.

πŸ”₯ you πŸ”₯ are πŸ”₯ amazing πŸ”₯ β†’ Rhythmic emphasizing cadence.

You are amazing πŸ†πŸŽ†βœ¨πŸ”₯πŸ’ͺπŸ€©πŸ’… β†’ Pure expressive exuberance.

You 🫢 are ✨ amazing βœ¨πŸŽ†πŸ†πŸ’¦πŸ’¦πŸ’¦πŸ¦ͺπŸ₯΅πŸ† β†’ Horny, chaos mode.

Emoji aren’t a language you can speak with your voice, and yet they give us a voice. They are the facial twitches and raised eyebrows that flat text stripped out of speech. They shrug, smirk, lean in, and give us a look up and down so that horny text doesn’t have to do it alone.

If the last five thousand years of writing has taught us anything, it’s that emoji won't mature by stuffing 4,000 more noun buttons into an already bloated keyboard. It moves forward through flexible visual modifiers and tone ligatures that combine on the fly. While speculative, my mind wanders to…… …. .

  • Directional ligatures: Instead of adding separate glyphs for pointing left, right, up, down, you tap a base icon and swipe a trajectory. A car moving forward is a commute; a car flipped reverse is a retreat.

  • Tone and intensity diacritics: Just as acute accents or umlauts alter the sound of a vowel, visual modifiers can alter emotional volume. A small heat shimmer modifier turns πŸ”₯ into mild warmth or an inferno without cluttering the drawer with five separate flame designs.

  • Semantic compounds: Think about how Korean Hangul snaps consonants and vowels into neat syllable blocks, or how Chinese pairs radical classifiers with phonetic roots. We already do this under the hood with Zero-Width Joiners (this is how we glue a face to a cloud to make Face in Clouds πŸ˜Άβ€πŸŒ«οΈ). The future isn’t inventing a brand-new glyphs for every hybrid concept; but maybe it could be combining existing primitives together like Lego bricks.

A writing system collapses long before it can successfully itemize our physical reality. Scribes figured out five thousand years ago that you can't carve the entire world onto a rock. Mesopotamia did not draw every type of sheep. Egypt did not draw every fish in the Nile. Their writing systems survived because people quit counting livestock and started snapping pieces together to build weird, ambitious ideas. β›²

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?