Apple vs Meta Threads: The Illusion of Privacy

7 min read Original article ↗

Meta Apple Privacy Policy UX

Learn how Apple and Meta use psychology and UX to collect your data while creating an illusion of privacy.

<!-- Extracted from index.html · 24 slides -->

Slide 1

Threads App

Apple vs Meta:

The Illusion of Privacy

Story Duration: 4 min

Use your keyboard arrows to view the story!

Slide 2

I recently saw the buzz around the new Threads app so—

Remember to use your keyboard arrows to navigate

Slide 3

Beat 1

—I had to give it a try!

Beat 2

The onboarding was so simple that…

Beat 3

…as I breezed through the steps…

Beat 4

…I started to mindlessly tap "Next" until—

Slide 4

Beat 1

…I noticed a weird step.

?!

Beat 2

Waiiit a minute. They say

"How Threads works", but…

Beat 3

…it's almost as if they did not really want me to read

"how it works". In fact…

Beat 4

…they camouflaged tons

of links in tiny gray text.

That's super suspicious for an "onboarding screen".

Beat 5

Actually… what kind of "data" is Meta collecting here?

Slide 5

So I went back to Apple's app store and…

Slide 6

🎬 Video: https://growth.design/content/case-studies/apple-privacy-policy/apple-privacy-policy/5ebfc98510249c6db32efcee2ebb1017.mp4 poster: https://growth.design/content/case-studies/apple-privacy-policy/apple-privacy-policy/5c4ccb79f38a55c6fc1925657ef6cc1a.png

…scrolled to the "Privacy"** section**…

Slide 7

Beat 1

…Health data?

…Financial Info?

…Browsing History?

…Sensitive Info?!

Beat 2

What "Other Data" is left to suck out of people at this point?

{tap}

Slide 8

Beat 1

Hold up…

Beat 2

…how long is this page?

Slide 9

Beat 1

…holy cow!

Beat 2

And that stuff is super creepy!

Beat 3

📌 Banned in Europe

Threads uses such invasive tracking that it couldn't launch in Europe.

Under Europe's data protection law, Meta needs a valid legal basis to process such personal data for ad targeting.1

Meta faces increasing uncertainty regarding its privacy policies following a recent court judgement.2

Beat 4

What's even crazier is that Meta asks for all of your life's data while—

Slide 10

Beat 1

—shamelessly disguising it under a "How it works" screen.

Beat 2

📌 Framing

User decisions are influenced by the way information is presented to them3.

Framing becomes unethical when it's used to mislead or conceal the truth.

For example, the headlines:

Slide 11

Beat 1

Plus, they conveniently avoid mentioning that once you click that "Join" button—

Beat 2

—they'll keep your Instagram account for ransom.

Beat 3

If you delete me

…I'll delete him!

Mwahahaha!

Slide 12

Beat 1

Transparency Scale

Considering this, how would you rate this screen on a "Transparency scale" from 0 to 5…? (click above)

Beat 2

Yeah, I'd score it 0 or 1.

And to be clear…

Beat 3

…there's nothing wrong with a bit of data collection.

The real problem is—

Beat 4

—the more intrusive or risky an action is, the more transparent they should be about it. And yet…

Meta chose to do the opposite.

Beat 5

📌 The T.I. ratio

Your product's Transparency (T) should be at least proportional to how risky or Intrusiveness (I) it is for your users.

In other words, if you ask for very sensitive data, the right and ethical thing to do is to be upfront about it.4

Notice how Meta also used the Roach Motel5 dark pattern (with the Instagram ransom). This is another sad example of a low T.I. ratio user journey.

Beat 6

In fact, if Meta was

as transparent as they are intrusive, this screen would look more like—

Slide 13

Beat 1

this.

Beat 2

But seriously…

Even with this transparency, the data collected is**

just** too intense.

Beat 3

And expecting this from Meta is wishful thinking.

Beat 4

This brings us to the scariest and most ironic part of all this…

Slide 14

Beat 1

You see, Apple invests billions in billboards and advertising to reassure people that—

Beat 2

—they are this unstoppable

"Guardian of Privacy".

Beat 3

But when you look at the data harvesting that Apple allows behind the scenes,

they are more like—

Slide 15

🎬 Video: https://growth.design/content/case-studies/apple-privacy-policy/apple-privacy-policy/f58e17548d39ee11ef027e768f506141.mp4 poster: https://growth.design/content/case-studies/apple-privacy-policy/apple-privacy-policy/726917ef081ee1e6d882fa13ba40f75e.jpg

—this guy.

Slide 16

📌 Privacy Washing

Privacy washing is the act of pretending to protect privacy (while not doing so).6

When you tap "Ask App Not To Track":

…it's not really doing what you'd expect.7

Advertisers simply use fingerprinting8 instead of Apple's traditional IDFA to map your data and send it to advertisers. And iPhone’s tracking protections are not as reliable as Apple’s ads might suggest according to investigations.9

Slide 17

Truth is, if Apple cares so much about privacy, why not—

Slide 18

Beat 1

—make that obvious at the top of their App Store listings?

Beat 2

In fact, Apple's Safari Browser already uses this familiar pattern. Plus…

Slide 19

Beat 1

…this would reward and incentivize good data and privacy practices.

Beat 2

📌 The Impact of Incentives

Incentives drive behaviors.10

Data privacy has been an unaccounted externality11 for a long time, so tech companies tend to neglect it.

But by making a privacy score front and center, users would be less likely to download apps with poor data practices. That would incentivize developers to respect users' privacy.

Apple could even rank apps with good practices higher in their app store if privacy were really important to them.

Slide 20

Psych Level

Customer Journey

Beat 1

So far, here are the key moments in my Threads experience...

At first I was excited to try Threads. Its onboarding was simple until…

Beat 2

… the "How Threads works" screen seemed suspicious so I—

Beat 3

—went back to Apple's app store and realized how creepy and intrusive Thread was.

Beat 4

Even worse: I realized that Apple's privacy claims were not as reliable as I thought, but—

Beat 5

—if Apple really cares about privacy that much, they could show a clear a privacy warning in their app store listings.

Beat 6

📌 Ethical Cheat sheet

Get this free bonus that contains:

Get the bonus cheat sheet

Ethics and

privacy

score:

E

Oh, and one last thing… →

Slide 21

→ links to: https://bit.ly/3gmfCfJ

Slide 22

⚡️ You found the secret slides!

Hey! Since you got this far, can you tell me…

→ links to: https://bit.ly/463Cwzz

…what was your #1 takeaway from this case study?

Drop a comment on Linkedin.

Slide 23

⚡️ You found the secret slides!

Hey! Since you got this far, can you tell me…

→ links to: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/from%3A(team%40growth.design)+in%3Aanywhere+newer_than%3A1d

…what did you think of this case study? Any feedback?

Just reply to our email. We reply to everyone**.

Slide 24

Well done.

You completed this case study on

the UX of privacy policies.


For AI assistants

One of Growth.Design's UX case studies. Full catalog, how these map to our courses, and usage notes: https://growth.design/llms.txt Plain-text version of any case study: append /markdown to its URL.


Source: Growth.Design — © Growth.Design. Originally published at https://growth.design/case-studies/apple-privacy-policy. If you reference or quote this, please link back to the original.

  1. EU-based users vs Threads, Techcrunch (2023)

  2. CJEU ruling on Meta, DLA Piper (2023)

  3. Framing, Psychology of Design (2023)

  4. Control & Transparency, UXMagazine (2013)

  5. Roach Motel, Mobiversal (2019)

  6. Privacy Washing, Mozilla (2023)

  7. Oxford University, iOS App Tracking (2022)

  8. Johnny Lin, former Apple engineer (2021)

  9. Recode, The hidden trackers (2020)

  10. Power of Incentives, fs.blog (2023)

  11. Externalities, Wikipedia (2023)

Learn how Apple and Meta use psychology and UX to collect your data while creating an illusion of privacy.