GitHub - BeadW/synaxi-predict: Predicts cost, turns, and pass rate for coding agent runs before they start

7 min read Original article ↗

MIT License Python 3.9+ CI

Predicts the cost, turn count, and pass rate of a Claude Code task before it runs — so you can pick the right model without wasting tokens on a bad fit. Closes the loop by capturing actual results and feeding them back into the model.


Part of the Synaxi ecosystem.

Synaxi is a macOS app that cuts Claude API costs by stripping token waste from every request before it leaves your machine — deduplicating tool schemas, pruning stale conversation history, compressing verbose JSON, and more. Average reduction: 40%+ per request, with no code changes and under 1ms added latency. Free for personal use.

synaxi-predict tackles the complementary problem: picking the right model before the task runs. Together they cover both sides of Claude cost control — less waste per token, and fewer tokens on the wrong model.


How it works

/synaxi-predict Fix the failing migration
        │
        ▼
  Model              Est. cost   Turns   Pass
  ─────────────────────────────────────────────
  single-haiku       $    0.35    28.1    8%  ◀ recommended
  single-sonnet      $    0.62    18.4   11%
        │
        ▼  [you pick a model]
        │
        ▼
  Subagent runs the task with the chosen model
        │
        ├─ bin/parse-session reads the subagent's session JSONL
        │   → exact turns, token counts, real cost (not estimated)
        │
        ├─ Eval agent checks git diff + test output → passed: true/false
        │
        └─ bin/record-actual logs prediction vs. actuals
           → feeds back into next training run

Predictions use an MLP trained on ~53k agent runs (SWE-bench, SWE-smith, OpenHands, loong0814, real Claude Code runs). Input features: TF-IDF on task text + tree-sitter code complexity features from the current repo (see Features).

Install

Inside any Claude Code session:

/plugin marketplace add BeadW/synaxi-predict
/plugin install synaxi-predict

On the next session start, Claude Code automatically:

  • Installs the Python package (pip install -e)
  • Downloads the model artifact (~190MB) from GitHub Releases into your platform data directory (~/Library/Application Support/synaxi-predict/ on macOS, ~/.local/share/synaxi-predict/ on Linux)

Updates happen the same way — bump version in .claude-plugin/plugin.json, release, and the hook re-runs on next session.

Copy .env.example to .env and add your ANTHROPIC_API_KEY if you plan to run benchmarks.

Manual install (development)

git clone https://github.com/BeadW/synaxi-predict ~/synaxi-predict
cd ~/synaxi-predict
git lfs pull        # download trained model (~190MB)
pip install -e .

Usage

Manual: /synaxi-predict

In any Claude Code session, type:

/synaxi-predict Fix the failing login migration

Claude runs the predictor, shows the table, and asks which model you want. After you pick, it dispatches a subagent with that model, then automatically records the actual cost and turns against the prediction.

Automatic: synaxi-predict skill

Once installed, Claude invokes this skill automatically whenever it decides to spawn a subagent — no explicit command needed. The prediction table is computed at skill load time via dynamic injection (tree-sitter code features included), so there's no extra tool call overhead.

CLI

# Predict for a task (shows all models)
bin/predict "Add OAuth login" --repo-path /path/to/project

# Predict for Claude Code models only
bin/predict "Add OAuth login" --models single --repo-path .

# List all supported models
bin/predict --list-models

# Show model training date
bin/predict --version

# Parse a subagent session for exact metrics (agentId from Agent tool result)
bin/parse-session <agentId> /path/to/project

# Record actuals manually
bin/record-actual <pred_id> --turns 18 --cost 0.42 --passed true

Features

Each prediction combines three input groups:

1. Text features — TF-IDF (L2-normalised) over the model name prepended to the task description. Captures task type, verb, domain keywords.

2. Tree-sitter code features — extracted from the Python files in your repo at prediction time. Requires tree-sitter and tree-sitter-python (included in core dependencies). If unavailable the model falls back to text features only.

Feature Description
loc Total lines of code across changed/all .py files
functions Count of def statements
classes Count of class statements
branches if + for + while statements
try_blocks try/except blocks
n_files Number of .py files analysed
avg_loc loc / n_files
branch_density branches / max(loc, 1)
has_code_features 1 if extraction succeeded, 0 if it fell back to zeros

3. Model context — per-model average prompt tokens from training data (proxy for context window pressure).

Closed-loop recording

Every completed task produces a ground-truth record in data/actuals_live.jsonl, including the tree-sitter snapshot taken at prediction time:

{
  "prediction_id": "c7df172d",
  "model": "single-haiku",
  "pred_cost": 0.504,  "actual_cost": 0.243,
  "pred_turns": 86.8,  "actual_turns": 8,
  "passed": true,
  "code_features": {
    "loc": 9042, "functions": 460, "classes": 94,
    "branches": 623, "try_blocks": 51, "n_files": 30,
    "avg_loc": 301.4, "branch_density": 0.069, "has_code_features": 1
  }
}

The code_features field is what makes contributed actuals valuable for retraining — it lets the model learn from real Claude Code runs on real codebases, not just SWE-bench benchmarks.

After accumulating enough actuals, retrain:

python -m predictor.train

Training data

Source Records Notes
SWE-smith 25,826 Synthetic SWE tasks, claude-3-7/3-5-sonnet/gpt-4o
loong0814 mini 9,990 SWE-bench Verified, 5 models
OpenHands SWE-bench Lite 5,693 19 models, real pass/fail
loong0814 full 3,639 Real API costs from accumulated_cost
Claude Code runs 725 HumanEval/MBPP runs, upsampled ~14×

Model performance (held-out 20%)

Target MAE Within 2×
turns 0.59 10.4 turns 91%
completion tokens 0.32 2,936 tok 75%
pass rate (AUC-ROC) 0.91 84% acc

Turn predictions are calibrated for SWE-bench-style tasks; real Claude Code runs tend to use fewer turns than predicted. This improves as more actuals are recorded via the synaxi-predict skill.

Repo structure

bin/                     Executable wrappers (predict, record-actual, parse-session)
predictor/               Core prediction, training, and session-parsing logic
  predict.py             CLI entry point and cost calculation
  train.py               MLP training pipeline
  parse_session.py       Parses Claude Code session JSONL for exact metrics
  record_actual.py       Records actuals against predictions
scripts/                 Dataset importers and eval tools
  import_*.py            Normalise benchmark datasets → data/runs/
  extract_*.py           Compute tree-sitter features for benchmark repos
  eval_holdout.py        R², MAE, within-2× on 20% holdout
  eval_pass_rate.py      AUC-ROC, Brier score, calibration
features/code/           Benchmark task definitions (HumanEval, MBPP, etc.)
data/runs/               Training corpus (JSONL, one record per agent run)
data/models/             Trained model artifact (Git LFS)
data/code_features.json  Tree-sitter features per benchmark instance
.claude-plugin/          Plugin metadata (plugin.json, marketplace.json)
commands/                /synaxi-predict slash command
skills/                  synaxi-predict skill (auto-invoked on subagent spawn)

Expanding the dataset

Each scripts/import_*.py pulls a public benchmark and normalises it into data/runs/. New importers should produce JSONL with:

{
  "task_id":           "source/instance_id",
  "strategy":          "model-id",
  "task_text":         "description of the task",
  "prompt_tokens_raw": 45000,
  "completion_tokens": 8200,
  "num_turns":         32,
  "total_cost_usd":    0.84,
  "passed_criteria":   true,
  "mode":              "multi-turn"
}

prompt_tokens_raw = context size at the final API call. completion_tokens = total across all turns.

Contributing data

Actuals from real Claude Code runs are the most valuable training signal — benchmark data (SWE-bench etc.) doesn't capture how the model behaves on everyday coding tasks or typical codebases.

Every time the synaxi-predict skill completes a task it writes a record to data/actuals_live.jsonl containing the task text, actual turns/cost, pass result, and the tree-sitter code features of your repo at prediction time. You can share these records to improve the model for everyone:

bin/contribute      # shows uncontributed records, prompts to share via GitHub issue
bin/contribute --all  # non-interactive, contributes everything

Requires the gh CLI to be authenticated (gh auth login). Each record is posted as a GitHub issue with the contribution label and validated before being merged into the training set.

What gets shared: task text, model name, predicted vs actual turns/cost, pass/fail, and the code_features snapshot. No file contents, no diffs, no personal information.

When to contribute: after a few tasks have accumulated — check with bin/contribute to see what's pending. The more diverse the tasks and codebases, the better the calibration for real Claude Code usage.

Contributing code

See CONTRIBUTING.md. PRs welcome — especially new benchmark importers and actuals data.

License

MIT — use freely, attribution appreciated.